One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Boo_Boo
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 ... 1349 next>>
Dec 17, 2013 19:03:24   #
OldSchool wrote:
This is liberalism for you.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2939762511001/peta-blasts-bear-mauling-victim/


Before everyone jumps up in rage at the bear h****rs, as I was about to do before I did some digging. The girl that was mauled was hunting deer. The bear had a cub and went into defense of her cub, not a k**ler bear. The bear, by the way, was scared off with a gun shot in the air.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/pennsylvania-teen-survives-scary-bear-attack-article-1.1545298
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 18:43:59   #
First it was mobs brutally k*****g w****s just for fun, then a new (or according to one OPP member) old game called knock out. Now it is Mob shopping.

What do you thing of the new activities of our poor, bored, and .................... black youths????


http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/cops-black-mob-kidnaps-rapes-teen-girls/

Do read the entire article, at the bottom is another fine example of these misunderstood youths and how they deal with boredom. Rape?? Kidnap?? Murder?? And mainstream still ignores the trend in these animals!
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 18:25:31   #
OldSchool wrote:
Woo hoo! The courts are finally getting fed up with Obungler's executive powers abuse.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/conncarroll/2013/12/17/federal-judge-calls-obamacare-totally-ineffective-while-striking-down-contraception-mandate-n1764623?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm


It is time for them to start speaking up. Two years ago no court would have listened never mind set down such a ruling! GREAT! :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 18:18:17   #
Check it out!


MERRY CHRISTMAS!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kjoUjOHjPI
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 16:02:48   #
slatten49 wrote:
Ginnyt, you are being fired for making me LMAO! :thumbup:


How about the judge during the dance...... I was laughing so hard that my cat ran from the room!!!
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 15:28:57   #
oldroy wrote:
I think the cartoon is self-explanatory.

http://patriotpost.us/humor/22310


:thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 15:21:13   #
If you thought that was funny, have a go at this one!

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment/blogs/tv-guy/os-snl-spoofs-obamacare-interpreter-20131215,0,3693899.post

Fired for being too hot!
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 15:20:22   #
DuaneHartline wrote:
What SNL spoof? It was a BP commercial!

The commercial is 18 seconds long, the SNL begins immediately after.
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 15:14:40   #
OldSchool wrote:
I am posting this to go along with my other posting "Universe-shattering' twist in Obama birth probe." This article states records that could document status mysteriously missing.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/arpaio-investigation-obama-might-be-kenyan/#1X7dgkc03u8xBuYE.99


The circumstances of his birth and his records become more complex as time goes on. Up until 2007 Obama's own literary agency was using a Bio supplied and approved by Obama that describes him as "Born in Kenya. Raised in Indonesia and Hawaii..." If Obama approved this bio, would he not have corrected the error of his place of birth? I would, had it been me and I think most people would do the same. Is it not peculiar that only a very select set of records are missing, with the exception of the birth record that was found in Australia. Records of Kenya as a British Protectorate were housed in Australia after Kenya's independence from Britain. Go to http://www.thepowerhour.com/news4/obama_kenyan_birth_certificate.htm to see copies. There are raised seals very visible on these copies. I think that because the records for that week is missing, I would back track the mother. Is there a record of her leaving? If there is a gap missing from records where people believe that she had traveled to Kenya, then the cover up is assured. In my mind, there is no doubt the Hawaiian birth certificate is forged; too many discrepancies.
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 08:59:50   #
kattmanduu wrote:
Wow! This gonna be fun! I will open with the part of our 1st amendment of our Constitution, that says the state shall not support religion. (period) and that all the people shall have the right to choose what ever belief they wanted without interference from the state.
With that said, I will say a great big non-Texan howdy to all.
That part of the Constitution I mentioned basically said that America is a land of all religions and all races, no matter who or what we say our creator may be.


Our founding fathers wisely avoided the issue of who or what the creator is or is not. That was then, and should be now, an individual decision and is personal.

Now then, on to the 1st Amendment as it pertains to religion; "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise ......" You must also take Amendment 14 the "Due Process Clause" for the scope of the government. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government even though it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion. The establishment clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. The free exercise clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a person's practice of their religion.

However, religious actions and rituals can be limited by civil and federal laws.

Religious freedom is an absolute right, and includes the right to practice any religion of one’s choice, or no religion at all, and to do this without government control.

Your rights to Freedom of Religion and the free exercise thereof means:
•The Freedom of Religion is an inalienable right.
•The First Amendment provides for the Freedom of Religion for all Americans.
•The Free Exercise Clause provides that government will neither control nor prohibit the free exercise of one’s religion.
•The government will remain neutral.


The first amendment does not address race or individual belief systems. It does not address the exemption, however, the Supreme Court has ruled on certain types of exemptions such as from taxes and certain "blue laws."

For state constitution regarding religion and the practice thereof, one must read and analyze those constitutions to ferret out state involvement. Ergo, your opening statement is either an oversight, a misunderstanding of the intent of the Constitution, or you may be talking about your own state's involvement in religious practice.

Thomas Jefferson once claimed, “A democracy cannot be both ignorant and free.”
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 08:01:30   #
Too many new strains of bacteria and v***s are now resistant to drug therapy. I believe, as you, we are k*****g ourselves with all of the additives being put into our foods.

Just take a look at the additives listed by the FDA at http://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/foodadditivesingredients/ucm091048.htm and you can see, we are not eating natural food anymore but a group of chemicals that is supposed to keep us and our families safe; but what are the long range effects?

4Him wrote:
Our food is being contaminated by so many unknown ingredients that it is difficult to feel there is any nutrition in it. I get migraine headaches from all artificial sweeteners. If information is not listed completely, it puts everyone in danger. It is not a new issue as our meats have been so filled with antibiotics that we are now facing unresponsive bugs immune to many treatments. Guess those who decided to go along with this must grow/raise their own food. What's truly sad is so many children have developed ADHD and the food tampering, in my humble opinion, is largely responsible.
Our food is being contaminated by so many unknown ... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 07:54:21   #
First, allow me to welcome you to OPP. It is good to see someone who is unafraid to tell the t***h or stand up against some of the bullies that troll this site. Good for you.

My two cents on this. You and Carolyn are correct, Obama has taken credit for everything that has turned out to benefit the American people, while blaming everything else on President Bush. President Bush was not perfect, but he does not deserve the bashing he is subjected to by this administration.

"Obama has passed the buck to others – mainly George W. Bush – for no less than 13 problems that characterize his presidency, suggesting time and again that his own policies are not to blame for his difficulties and he is simply doing the best that can be done with the cards he was dealt.

Even so, Obama is aggressively staking a claim for successes for which Bush shares significant or nearly all responsibility, including increased drilling for oil and natural gas, the end of the Iraq War, and the k*****g of Osama Bin Laden." This is quoted from the following web site:

http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2012/03/23/president-obamas-hall-blame/

Some of the excuses are quoted for your reading enjoyment.

Again, welcome aboard!

deb_bus wrote:
I'm with carolyn. As usual, obama did try and take all the credit for something he had nothing to do with. I don't know as much as carolyn and retnavtcwo do. But I know what I heard and it was a taking credit for anything he can get away with. It's obvious that retnavy is an obama supporterand will defend him to no end. I just don't understand how anyone could support him when he has lied so much about everything. What do obama supporters see in him? He's a farce and has been since he was born. He lies about being born in kenya to this day. He started out in life as a lie and has continued it ever since. His only good trait is a gift of gab and a con. He has sure pulled the wool over his supporters eyes. I could never back him and I used to be a democrat. I changed when bush came into office. And I won't change back.
I'm with carolyn. As usual, obama did try and take... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 07:23:37   #
I ran across this article and I wish to share it with you, for those who have children or grandchildren; this article is to give you heads up. It seems that the major dairy farms wants to add an ingredient into milk and milk products that is harmful to your health. I am not criticizing the action, I am just passing it along. Of course, this subject is open for comment as you see fit.

"According to the IDFA and NMPF, nutrient content claims such as “reduced calorie” are not attractive to children and have led to an overall decline in milk consumption in schools. Essentially, as with the GMO labeling issue, they don’t want you or your child to be “confused” or perhaps “scared away” by t***hful labeling... "

Read the full story at:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/03/13/unlabeled-aspartame-use.aspx?e_cid=2ndBestOfNL_art_1&et_cid=DM34351&et_rid=371640472
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 00:29:49   #
Ghost wrote:
I notice a lot of these new devices has "smart" before them like smart phone, smart tv, smart app, etc.

Ironic when it says smart it is usually used in ways and by users unbecoming of such.

The whole world is going stupid because we let smart ass machines do all the thinking for us.


:thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Dec 17, 2013 00:21:18   #
Good one! I am not sure how I would feel about his departure, but I have a pix that might say it all!


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 ... 1349 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.