Roe v Wade is not a law, not a statute in the Federal Code, it was not passed by congress and signed into law by the president. Roe v Wade is a SCOTUS ruling,
(Obamacare is a SCOTUS ruling, not a law)

A SCOTUS ruling can be overturned by SCOTUS, congress, or an amendment.

Lower-Court Decisions Reveal Roe v. Wade’s Extremism

The 14th amendment was ratified in 1968 during the Civil Rights brouhaha; Section 1 of the amendment was included to remove all doubt about the citizenship status of b***k A******ns and clear up any challenges to their right to v**e. Equal protection under the law.

Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

(Note the 14th amendment says nothing about "a right of personal privacy, or a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy”. Sounds very much like a judge's interpretation based on his or her politically biased opinion rather than the wording of the 14th amendment.)

This brings up a question: Since Roe v Wade is not a law, merely a court ruling, how does the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment apply?

More questions: Who determined at what stage during pregnancy does a baby become viable, i.e., capable of living?

Who determined at what stage during pregnancy does a baby become human?
When a woman conceives, it is a good bet that she will not give birth to a frog or a chicken.
At the moment of conception, everything necessary to create a human being - genes, DNA, and so forth - are present, all the baby needs then is food and water. And love, lots of love.

“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you; Before you were born I sanctified you;

If a baby is human at the moment of conception, and grows as a human while in that "zone of privacy", and is born a human, why does Roe v Wade - a court ruling - deny the little human's right to Life, Liberty and equal protection of the laws?

If the 14th amendment guarantees a woman's right to choose whether or not to k**l her baby, why does it not guarantee any American the right to choose whether or not to get the C***d jab?

One more question: What guns does the 2nd amendment say we have a right to own?

The mental abuse perpetuated by l*****t parents can be more permanent than a few swats on the hind end. When l*****t parents let their 3 year olds determine what g****r they want to be, that is blatant child abuse. When they let their 3 year old boy dress up in panties and a skirt, that is child abuse. When they buy their 3 year old boy Barbie Dolls that is child abuse. I would rather have a Conservative parent who gave me a few well deserved swats than parents who let me change my sex at 3 years old, let me be t*********red and ruined my life forever.