I am right up front, my name is ALL over that post of which you speak and what I posted is the t***h so it isn't even "throwing poop" (< are we in kindergarten? Speak like an adult, for those that object to "s**t", there is "crap" and for those that object to those two options, there is "feces") either. There is nothing "nasty" about correcting one's ignorance.

As for lying, withholding the t***h or exaggerations, there was none of any of those in my correction of his ignorance. Just because some are too ignorant and refuse to face actual facts, that doesn't make the facts any less valid. You do realize that at least two of those links are to conservative/conservative leaning sites. I have heard Trump supporters claims that Wikipedia is liberal biased with no actual proof of this liberal bias, but that doesn't mean that they ARE liberally biased. I have also heard claims that The Guardian is liberally biased, let's assume for the sake of argument that they are liberally biased, does that make the story false? Does that mean that Trump's foundation wasn't shut down? Does that mean there isn't any lawsuits?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-foundation-agrees-to-dissolve-after-lawsuit-alleged-illegal-conduct (conservative media source)

https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2018-12-18/trump-foundation-to-shut-down-amid-allegations-of-misuse-from-ny-ag (another conservative media source)

I suppose you had better complain at those two for reporting "f**e news" then. They should know better than to attack their own party with "f**e" claims.

Please show me where my "lying, withholding the t***h or exaggerations" is at, I haven't found it in that post of mine.

As for "That's what you do to us....attack Trump, attack us.", Please do show where I "attacked Trump to attack you people", I fail to see any such attack I made against Trump in my post that you are attacking me over. Any "attack" I made was on cbpat1's ignorance, there was no such "attack" on Trump in that post.

Actually... Forgive me, I have come to understand what you meant. Telling the t***h about Trump IS an attack on Trump since he opens himself to legitimate attacks on him through his being so crooked. If he hadn't misused the funds in his foundation, none of those articles would have existed and therefore they couldn't be used to prove how crooked he is and was.

There is one thing you can do to prevent being "attacked" via someone attacking Trump, stop supporting and apologizing for Trump and then when he gets "attacked" you don't feel hurt by it. If one does not associate and/or support a crook, they can NEVER be considered "guilty by association".