One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Randy131
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 182 next>>
Nov 7, 2017 11:14:11   #
"EXACTLY" Jake, and he is a Russian immigrant I believe, because I believe he bragged about that a while back on a different OPP site thread. He doen't realize that the US military personnel are not like the Russian military personnel.

Semper Fidelis brother.



Jakebrake wrote:
Any verifiable proof American forces committed these war crimes? I realize you have never served and your animus toward the military is quite obvious.
Go to
Nov 7, 2017 10:59:09   #
Unfortunately for you and your propaganda, the claim that Republicans originally funded the "Trump Dossier", has been proven a lie.

No Republican funded anything that had to do with the infamous "Trump Dossier" report of 64 pages, which was funded with $12 million from Hillary Clinton and the DNC, which we have found out from Donna Brazile that Hillary Clinton was paying the DNC bills anyway ($9 million), and the rest by Obama (another $3 million), which all was paid through a liberal law firm in Washinton DC as a shield for deniability of collusion with the Russians, who provided much of the false information, to and through Fusion GPS, another layer of deniability, and finally to the real authors, the British spy Steele and the Russians.

The group that you refer to as Republican funders of the infamous "Trump Dossier" was actually the 'Washington Free Beacon', who had a written contract with Fusion GPS to provide any information that they could find on Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, so they could publish that information on both the candidates in their publication, so their readers could then learn about the candidates from their publiocation, which probably happened in most news publications. When Fusion GPS provided them with the material that they had found on both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, long before Fusion GPS ever hired British spy Steele and the Russians to make up the false "Trump Dossier", their contract had ended, and none of the information that was provided to the 'Washington Free Beacon' included anything that was included in the much later infamous "Trump Dossier", that was produced months after the 'Washington Free Beacon' contract had ended with Fusion GPS.

But because Fusion GPS was hired in a contract with the 'Washington Free Beacon' to provide information about Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, long before British spy Steele and the Russians were hired to produce the "Trump Dossier", and that contract was with a publication that is a conservative publication, the 'Washington Free Beacon', you falsely claim that Republicans initiated the infamous "Trump Dossier", when in reality they had nothing to do with it, and the 'Washington Free Beacon', nor any Republican, ever received any information that was in the "Trump Dossier". But appaently you were indoctrinated with these lies and have kept spreading them, wanting the Reuplicans to share the guilt and blame for what you know is a proven false report that only Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and Obama paid $12 million for, and not one single Republican funded a dime for it, and because their deniability layers, the liberal law firm and Fusion GPS took millions of the top for a simple 64 page report, before the British spy and the Russians received what was left of the $12 million, in this the real and only collusion with the Russians.

It's really funny how you liberals refer to telling the t***h as "bashing liberals". That says a lot about liberals, doesn't it. Claiming that Republicans had anything to do with funding the infamous "Trump Dossier" report is a great example of how liberals lie, for it seems that anyone who paid Fusion GPS for any job that they were contracted with before Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and Obama paid $12 million for the creation of that 64 page false and infamous "Trump Dossier" report, also funded that report too.



JediKnight wrote:
Randy: you bash liberals while totally overlooking the fact that your president lies every day, and never apologizes for anything. You also seem to be unaware that originally it was republicans who funded the dossier project, and when T***p w*n the primary they dropped it - which allowed the democrats to pick it up. Why is it so easy to ignore the t***h for you guys?
Go to
Nov 7, 2017 07:32:26   #
If there were war crimes, then who committed them? I know for sure that Bush and Cheney were never involved in any war actions, nor were they on the battlefield giving orders. But someone like you, who never served in our US military, is condemning those who served in our US military, by accusing them of war crimes, and you haven't the first piece of evidence that would prove your accusations against the people who served in our military, as you disrespect and denigrate them with your false politcal lies.

If war crimes were committed, one thing can be accepted as true, that it wasn't our military personnel who committed them, nor our people who gave the orders to commit them, as there were 30 other countries in that coalition, and many from Islamic countries who generally do commit what you consider war crimes, but they consider fulfilling the mandates of their religion, like beheadings and other terrible things written into and mandated by by their holy book the Qur'an (Koran).

Nickolai wrote:
Never the less the war crimes were committed
Go to
Nov 7, 2017 07:21:08   #
Simple, that is called checking out and investigating the accusations before acting on what could be more of the Democrats' political lies, and when the t***h was confirmed, President Trump did the right thing.

Funny how Obama sometimes acted the same way and delayed what eventually should have been done, claiming he wanted to aim before he would shoot, but you never ever complained once about any of that, nor about any of the very many boldfaced lies that Obama never quit telling the American people, but if President Trump turns around twice, you accuse him of lying.

There is no t***h in you, just "HATRED", poltical activism that produces nothing but propaganda and lies, and we all know what that makes you.



PeterS wrote:
Trump hung onto Flynn for 18 days after Yates exposed what he had done. How is that "rather quickly"? I would sure h**e to see what he does when he acts slowly. And don't forget that Trump tried to get Comey to layoff Flynn as a "good guy." And 24 days? So who the hell was that yelling "lock her up, lock her up", at the convention? Flynn was around a hell of a lot longer than 24 days and if up to Trump he would be around him today.

You guys seem to have forgotten that Trump bragged about how he was only going to bring in the best people and to date he's brought in probably the worst of any administration. The show has just begun and the more Mueller prosecutes the more people are going to come crawling in asking for deals.
Trump hung onto Flynn for 18 days after Yates expo... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 7, 2017 07:13:44   #
I love it! So much t***h in what you say. John and Tony Podesta did ten times as much of the same things that Paul Manafort and Rick Gates have been indicted for by Robert Mueller, with the exact same Ukanians during the exact same time period. But John and Tony Podesta have been on the Clintons' payroll at one or another, just like Robert Mueller and James Comey have been at one time or another. Isn't it curious how crooks and thieves always hang together and protect each other, John Podesta, Tony Podesta, Robert Mueller, and James Comey, all political hacks bought and paid for by the Clintons.



MS. FACTUAL wrote:
Best check your facts...Manafort's indictment attaches to a time period he worked hand in hand with Hillary and Podesta's and has ZERO to do with Trump, further is has nothing at all to do with anything connected to anyone other then you democrats and Russians doing business with democrats.

You lose again...and again....(it's what YOU do)...LOSE!
Go to
Nov 7, 2017 07:03:19   #
"EXACTLY" Son, there is an awful lot rotten in Denmark when you have to deal with Democrats.

I've never seen a goup of people who are so completely lacking in honesty, integrity, and honor than those in the Democratic Party, who care more for their political party than they do for the USA, it's laws, and it's people, as they lie and c***t in our political system, and Donna Brazile, who is as guilty as any of them, is not exposing them all.

I've never seen an American citizen who couldn't produce a birth certificate when asked or was required to, until Obama came along, and even the hospital that the Democrats like to claim he was born in has no record of his birth either, but the lies continue anyway, and anyone who questions them are called derogatory names such as "Birthers".

The hilarious thing about all this is how the Democrats jump at believing lies that promote their political party's people, policies, and agendas, without the slighest care or curiosity for the t***h. But learn one thing about all this Son, it's useless and unproductive to argue with liars, especially indoctrinated ones.



son of witless wrote:
I was a despicable, if you were born here why can't you produce your original Birth Certificate with out the drama skeptic. I recently had to renew my CDL and the nice people at the DMV wanted my original with a seal on it. I had to sit through 3 and a half hours of DMV TV. If I had produce a valid Birth Certificate to renew a driver's license, why did Obama believe he could be President and not produce his ?

Why did I have to jump through hoops proving who I am just to renew my license and yet you people do not believe in v**er IDs ? Why do Obama and his v**ers get off easy while the rest of us constantly have to prove who WE are ??????????????????????????????????????
I was a despicable, if you were born here why can'... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 6, 2017 21:52:58   #
Son, most all of those Russian ads on social media were for Hillary Clinton, and against Donald Trump, as the owners of the top social media testified to the US Congress. Don't let them insinuate that it was different, look at their testimony, that question was asked of them by the Republicans on the congressional investigative committee, and they reluctantly answered it, because they would like people to think that the Russians were trying to help Donald Trump, when the opposite is true, and the sale of Uranium 1 is the reason behind the Russians supporting Hillary Clinton for President.



son of witless wrote:
Because everybody I know who v**ed for Trump are older white people. Those r****ts. Except for posting pictures of their grandchildren on facebook most of them don't even know how to use social media. Social media is used by young people. Those overwhelmingly went for Hitlery. The Russian adds from what I understand were mostly on Social Media.

Do you dispute my analysis ? How would you know anything about Trump v**ers ?

I don't know why I bothered to answer. None of you guys ever answer me.
Because everybody I know who v**ed for Trump are o... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 6, 2017 21:41:38   #
You don't know of any beheadings that were done by the Muslim terrorists that we were fighting??? Who was it that did the kneecap drilling that you seem to know a lot about and should then have proof of? I know it wasn't any American military personnel that did any kneecap drilling, but it could have been any of the coalition militaries that might have done that, especially the Muslim country coalition members, and if it was, why are you blaming our military personnel?

Have you ever served in the US military? There are an awful lot of people on these OPP sites that have, and they'd take extreme exception to you saying that they did things like that, or would even allow anyone around them to do that. This is very contrary to deeds like the Marine in Afghanistan that was court-martialed and thrown out of the USMC for beating-up an Afghanistan officer for raping a young boy in his quarters in Afghanistan, which the Marine heard the young boy screaming and came to his rescue. Really, have you ever served in the US military, which I doubt because all your comments are always completely void of the honesty, integrity, and honor our military personnel are taught, and demanded of them while serving the American people.



desparado wrote:
far as I know they didn't behead anyone but drilled a lot of holes in kneecaps and many from the black sites were never seen again.
As far as h**e us do you suppose bombing them for no reason for 17 years pissed them off
Go to
Nov 6, 2017 21:23:12   #
Roy, I apologize for not making this as clear as I should have. The DOJ didn't do the gerrymandering, the states are in charge of drawing up their own v****g districts, not the DOJ, but the DOJ ordered these states to draw up some v****g districts that would have a black people majority in them in order for some black people to win seats in the US Congress, as well as some political seats in local and state governments. The states did their own gerrymandering, not for what they wanted, but for what the DOJ ordered them to accomplish, in using gerrymandering techniques.

Also concerning how the e*****rial v**es are dispensed to each state, they are done according to the seats each state has in both houses of the US Congress, which besides the Senators being equal in every state, the majority of the e*****rial college v**es, and the reason for them varying, are determined by the number of Representatives from each state, which in turn is decided by the population of each state, with the exception that everystate gets at least one Representative, no matter how small their population is, and why there is a minimum of three e*****rial v**es in any state, plus that of Washington DC. So as I said, the number of e*****rial v**es are in actuality, where they vary from state to state, are alloted by population, as is the Representatives in every state, and is the reason those numbers change after the national census is taken every ten years, but by definition they are required to be equal to each state's members in the US Congress. I'm sorry I took a short cut, just explaining that it was the population in each state that determines the number each state is allotted, to this dummy that was claiming it was gerrymandering that the Republicans was using to c***t the blue states out of e*****rial v**es, and giving them to the red states. But if you don't consider the two e*****rial v**es that every state gets for each state's same number of Senators, the rest are actually determined by the population of each state, because that is what determines the number of Representaives each state is allowed. So it's my fault for taking a short cut when dealing with a dummy, if anyone became confused by what I said, which was true, just not the whole t***h for nit-pickers. Please accept my apology.



oldroy wrote:
I would like to call your attention to the fact that the DOJ doesn't determine anything to do with gerrymandering unless a state legislature has tried to be part of that little game. I try to call your attention to the fact that there was once a cartoon about what Elbridge Gerry, the Governor of Massachusetts, had done to assure Democratic-Republicans could win e******ns. An artist took a picture of one county in the state and added wings and a d**gon's head to it to show people what had been done. Gerrymandering is still done and both parties use it when they control state legislatures.

I do think that too many people haven't seen what gerrymandering really is and how it works.
I would like to call your attention to the fact th... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 6, 2017 18:17:23   #
Just as I figured and said, no authority to hold anyone guilty of war crimes, Malaysia being the largest Islamic country in the world with the largest population of Muslims, as every single one of their Muslims are prejudice against the US because we have the will and means to fight their barbaric brothers, which I'll bet nothing was ever even said in that phony court about all the beheadings of innocent people, just because they were not Muslims, as most were Christians, Jews, and people of other religions, but to that court beheadings are not war crimes, their religious mandates that the people of their religion are required to follow and carry out. Good source, what a hypocrite, your hatred is so strong that you use an obviously ridiculous claim for vengeance and degradation against people you h**e.



desparado wrote:
g bush and friends
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a35397/bush-cheney-war-crimes/
Go to
Nov 6, 2017 18:05:36   #
I'm well aware of what gerrymandering is and how it's been used, but the DOJ took several southern states to federal courts (not too long after the CRA was passed) about supposedly r****t policies that kept the black people from being able to r******r to v**e under the 'Civil Rights Act' (CRA), and they won, so the federal court ordered that the states would have to capitulte to the wants of the DOJ in order to correct and punish them for their wrongdoings of the past, and the DOJ still has that power over those states, as Eric Holder used it several times in Obama's first four years in office, as when this was first ruled this way, the DOJ ordered the states to gerrymander some of their districts to create a heavy black majority, in order for the b****s to get elected to the US Congress, and also in local and state political positions, and it was done as they DOJ had ordered.

I got involved in this because a liberal i***t was claiming that the Republicans was using gerrymandering to c***t blue states out of their e*****rial v**es, and giving them to red states, as she in the past has blamed gerrymandering by Republicans for every sin she could think of. I tried to expalin what she was saying was impossible, but she refuses to listen and holds strongly on to her emotional indoctrination, so we agreed not to make comments to each other, since common sense and t***h doesn't matter in trying to correct indoctrination of falsehoods.



oldroy wrote:
I would like to call your attention to the fact that the DOJ doesn't determine anything to do with gerrymandering unless a state legislature has tried to be part of that little game. I try to call your attention to the fact that there was once a cartoon about what Elbridge Gerry, the Governor of Massachusetts, had done to assure Democratic-Republicans could win e******ns. An artist took a picture of one county in the state and added wings and a d**gon's head to it to show people what had been done. Gerrymandering is still done and both parties use it when they control state legislatures.

I do think that too many people haven't seen what gerrymandering really is and how it works.
I would like to call your attention to the fact th... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 6, 2017 17:40:26   #
Every word I said was nothing but the t***h, too bad, the American people are now learning about d********g people like you.

One of the FBI investigators, who was forced to sign one of those NDAs, wanted to make public this Russian criminal activities information, which Congress just learned about by forcing the FBI to finally give them all the e-mails and other paperwork that they had subpoenaed well over a year ago, which the FBI had been stonewalling until President Trump's appointee took over and ordered them to produce those e-mails for all those congressional investigative committees. But when that FBI investigator wanted to make his information public long before the e******n in 2016, Obama and Loretta Lynch threatened him with loss of his freedom, and that they would also prosecute him for violating his NDA, which they said he would spend many years in prison for doing, again keeping the t***h hidden from the American people.

After his lawyer went to President Trump's DOJ, they removed his NDA and have allowed him to tell all the congressional investigative committes everything he knows about the Russian criminal activity to set up the Uranium 1 sale, which they have scheduled him to do in the order of the committees that they want to hear his information first, and then he will be allowed to give that information to the public and media, no more hiding it like Obama and Loretta Lynch's DOJ did. This is all coming out very soon, and is why many in Congress who have already been aprised of this information are demanding Robert Mueller to recuse himself.

And we all know about what James Comey did in leaking FBI documents, as he said that his excuse for breaking the law was that he wanted the information to get out to the public, so a Special Prosecutor would be appointed. What most people don't know of, is both James Comey's and Robert Mueller's past associations with the Clintons, and the money that they were paid by the Clintons for them to do the Clinton's bidding. But it's obvious what they did for the Clintons in preventing the prosecution of Hillary Clinton for the obvious mishandling of classified documents, which the law specifically states that no intention is needed to prosecute the mishandling of classified materials, because anyone who has the clearance to handle classified materials should already know how to, and how not to, handle classified materials.

Lie all you want, but the t***h is coming out all the time, and the t***h about the Russian criminal activities to set up the Uranium 1 sale, that Mueller kept hidden from the US Congress, is also coming out now, as President Trump, unlike Obama and the Democrats, wants the American people to have all the t***h of how those in power hurt the American people, for their own personal benefits. Just like Obama refused to release the 'Kennedy Assasination Files', but President Trump did, and when the Obama holdovers wanted at least hold back some of the more sensitive files, President Trump reviewed them and said the American people have the right to see these files too, and had all of them released.

That's the difference between you liberals always wanting your crimes to stay hidden, while President Trump says the American people's right to know is more important than people hiding things to preserve their unearned reputations, of supposedly being honest people, when the proof shows they lie more than most, simply for their own personal benefits, because they are just as d********g as you and all your lies. One thing that is good for me, and bad for you, is that most people on these OPP sites have already read everything that I've said, and they know the sources that prove it to be the t***h, for I only repeat what I've read on different news sites, and remember everything very easily when the Democrats have admitted their disgust for the information being released and made public.



permafrost wrote:
If anything you posted was true, you would have a case.

but nothing was like your post, so it all simply a wish by the right wing to stop people from paying attention to the orange con man..
Go to
Nov 6, 2017 16:49:44   #
Do you see anything in my comments that he claims that are not true, that hasn't been reported on news sites and on the internet news sites over the last ten days?



S. Maturin wrote:
So, Peremie, YOU have DEEMED another poster a liar? You simply declare like some god that 'this is true, that is false'? If you were not so offensive, you'd be entertaining.
Go to
Nov 6, 2017 13:24:02   #
Robert Mueller appears to be so stupid for stepping so far over the line trying to get to President Trump, that he stepped right into the Clinton/Russian collusion of the Uranium 1 sale of 20% of the US reserve uranium.

Robert Mueller was a key figure in that Uranium 1 sale by closing down the FBI investigation, that already had lots of proof of the Russians breaking our laws to get in the position to make that Uranium 1 purchase, that Mueueller actively facilitated, by closing down that FBI investigation, and forcing the key investigators to sign NDAs in order to keep all that information secret, and keep the US Congress from learning of the Russians breaking our laws to get in position to make the purchase of Uranium 1.

Had the US Congress known of the Russians breaking our laws to get in that position to buy Uranium 1, they would have stopped the Clinton's and Obama's sale of 20% of our uranium reserves to the Russians.

How much was Robert Mueller paid in this Uranium 1 deal to do what he did, and what was his buddy James Comey paid for preventing Hillary Clinton from being prosecuted for mishandling classified materials, by writing her denial of prosecution some two months before the FBI got to interview and interrogate Hillary Clinton and her staff? To all sane people, this shows that both Robert Mueller and James Comey have been bought and paid for by the Clintons, the chief organized crime family in the USA today, and have been preventing "justice for all" to prevail.



lindajoy wrote:
Not if things of the past are any indication.. Although I did read where a number of Senator are demanding Mueller step down or be removed for his role in all this starting when with the FBI..

That weasel should have never accepted looking for his 15 minutes of fame.. Which means yank him out by his neck!!

That dossier will never be used considering how it was procured and under what intent is was to be used.. Clinton trying to down play it shows how worried they really are over it.. Snaggedddd once again these scum are a Work of criminality!!
Not if things of the past are any indication.. Alt... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 6, 2017 12:40:46   #
Boy, what world do you live in, where you get to make up your own facts and make up your own t***hs. Reality must never affect you. But it has the British spy who made up the false "Trump Dossier", that Hillary Clinton, the DNC (John Podesta), and Obama paid $12 million for to two layers of deniability, a law firm and Fusion 1, who illegally paid foreigners to interfere in our e******n, just what you and your fellow i***ts are trying to mprove that President Trump had done, but after two years now haven't been able to find an iota of proof. That British spy is having his livelihood for the next 50 years sued from his grasp in the European courts by everyone that he included in the report, which in those courts everything that he put in that report is being proved false and lies. But our liberal biased mainstream media refuses to cover and report on those cases, in order to keep the lies alive for i***ts like you, but the canadian media are reporting on those cases in the Eurpean courts, as the Canadian people are laughing their heads off about people like you.

You claim to know so much, prove to us just one thing in that "Trump Dossier" that is true, show us the proof of just one of the things claimed in that report, since you know so much about it, proven by what you are claiming that "The dossier is proving to be true..."????? "PROOF OF JUST ONE THING"????? Also name just one US President that has ever been convicted of being a war criminal in any real and authentic court, and the name of that court, which you also insinuate that you know so much about? Did you ever tell the t***h, is your life just one bif fantasy "LIE"?



desparado wrote:
The dossier is proving to be true and hillery won the v**e despite the Russian help it would of been a landslide if the Russians stayed out of it.
anyone standing with or next to trump are on the wrong side of history.
The last republican president left office as a convicted war criminal and now this.
soon the pew pee tape
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 182 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.