One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Docadhoc
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 1096 next>>
Oct 21, 2017 12:27:42   #
tdsrnest wrote:
It was confirmed that the Las Vegas shooter that stood up of the 32nd floor with 32 legally purchased assault rifles, also 5 bump stocks to make these assault rifles fully automatic. (MURDERED 58 people) injured 487 people and the only option by the right wing is to create and repeal the law deregulating the use of a silencer. Maybe Republicans should be deported you're thoughts


Maybe you could stick to this thread topic.
Go to
Oct 21, 2017 03:09:42   #
Nickolai wrote:
First under the Bush administration Greenspan dropped it to 1 % and left it there too long four years allowing a housing bubble to build up and when he began raising the rate it burst the bubble and the walls came tumbling down. over night a trillion dollars of consumer spending dried up the financial system froze up and the stimulus program of government spending was passed as the government tried to become the spender of last resort and that entailed dropping interest to near zero in an attempt to reflate the economy with barrowing and un-freeze the financial system and flood the system with liquidity passed$11 trillion to the big banks and another $3 trillion since then to keep things going
First under the Bush administration Greenspan drop... (show quote)


And for 8 years while Obama was driving us in the hole $1.35 trillion/year and had the worst GDP growth in our history, the fed held down the interest rate. And now you say that because it was so low when Trump took office, there is no room to boost the economy.

So do 2 things.

1. Blame Obama.
2. Pay attention. The economy is picking up and if it fails...blame Barry.

You cannot have it both ways.

Better yet, use your energy to try to keep your state out of bankruptcy.

Then and only then can you talk about America, but first clean up your own backyard before trying to talk about how to run a country.
Go to
Oct 21, 2017 03:04:00   #
Nickolai wrote:
I haven't seen anything positive. Just throwing out regulations he made the claim that he has accomplished more in his nine months than another president In history but the record shows him to be the least productive FDR pushed through 15 major pieces of legislation in his first 100 days. his was only a part of a vast array of government programs that Roosevelt called The New Deal. After 40 years of assault from the modern conservative movement all that is left of it is Social Security and FDIC.
I haven't seen anything positive. Just throwing o... (show quote)


So you're the only person here who doesn't know what Trump has accomplished already.

If you want everyone to believe you're that dumb, that's fine with me. Just stop talking about that which you admit you know nothing about.
Go to
Oct 21, 2017 03:00:23   #
Nickolai wrote:
Conservative democrats and conservative Republicans both v**ed against the civil rights bill as did Sen Barry Goldwater the leading conservative of the time. liberals from both parties v**ed for it and yes the Republican party still had liberals of the Lincoln, T Roosevelt, tradition. One of the last liberal Republicans was Nelson Rockefeller VP of the Ford administration


Quit your childish spin. The democrats fought against the Civil Rights Act and if not for the republicans the b****s would not have the laws and benefits that you enjoy today.

If the democrats had their way the b****s would still be in the back of the bus and drinking from fountains labeled "colored".

It's bad enough that you're a liar, you're also a hypocrite. I was there in person in the Little Rock sit ins. I was in Selma. I saw first hand how they were treated. I was there in person when Wallace went on his tirade about inferior coloreds at the college entrance. You can shove your lies. I WAS THERE!!

Don't try to tell me what I experienced first hand. I saw the anti colored democrats speaking out against civil rights time after time. Your liberal PR is ridiculous and has zero connection to reality.

Stop making a fool of yourself.

You can't even begin to straighten out your state so your opinion is worthless. All you know how to do is search the net to find out what to parrot. I was there in person.
Go to
Oct 20, 2017 23:42:12   #
Nickolai wrote:
The recovery began in Dec 2009 from the trickle down debt collapse and December 2017 it will be eight years old equaling the longest from recession or depression in our history any thing beyond will be a new record so it is not a matter of if another recession will hit just a matter of when. If Der Schtump makes it to the end of his term it is guaranteed he will preside over the next recession and it will be a big one because with near zero interest the fed has no where to go to stimulate and reflate
The recovery began in Dec 2009 from the trickle do... (show quote)


Under whose administration did the fed drop the interest rate so low? You cannot have it both ways.
Go to
Oct 20, 2017 23:39:38   #
Nickolai wrote:
Der Schtump has not over turned any Obama failed policies his EO's have overturned regulations to keep our water clean from polution by coal companies and other such regulations naming a toady for big oil as head of EPA The protections from corporate greed Obamas policies bestowed is the enemy of Trumps billionaire friends it hurts their profits


Gee, all you seem to do is parrot the MSM.

Trump's accomplishments have been plastered all over the net so I guess you're the only person who hasn't seen them.
Go to
Oct 20, 2017 23:36:44   #
Nickolai wrote:
Yes but the Republicans of 1860 were the liberal party and the democratic party was the conservative party that has been reversed and has been since 1936. LBJ made no such statement. After he signed the civil rights act Bill Moyers asked him what was bothering him and he said I fear by signing that bill we have delivered the south to the Republicans for the next 50 years your quote is a bastardization of that comment and has been passed around by conservatives as true. Bill Moyers was LBJ's press Secretary and his accounts are first hand
Yes but the Republicans of 1860 were the liberal p... (show quote)


Do you think that Moyers, being LBJ's press secretary, would memorialize LBJ's r****t remarks in writing knowing it would give the black v**e to the republicans?

Do you think before you comment or just grab what you can from your liberal propaganda?

How thick can you be. Your own last sentence shows how biased Moyers was, but you want to say he wouldn't hedge his comments to protect his boss.

Nick.......so lame.
Go to
Oct 20, 2017 23:30:31   #
Nickolai wrote:
Yes but the Republicans of 1860 were the liberal party and the democratic party was the conservative party that has been reversed and has been since 1936. LBJ made no such statement. After he signed the civil rights act Bill Moyers asked him what was bothering him and he said I fear by signing that bill we have delivered the south to the Republicans for the next 50 years your quote is a bastardization of that comment and has been passed around by conservatives as true. Bill Moyers was LBJ's press Secretary and his accounts are first hand
Yes but the Republicans of 1860 were the liberal p... (show quote)


The democrats fought hammer, tooth, and nail against the civil rights act and there is no lying around it.
Go to
Oct 20, 2017 22:24:08   #
Randy131 wrote:
What is so laughable is that you imply you are an expert on economics, just because you falsely claim that Presidents have no influence on the economy, when their policies and agendas actually directs our economies, as has Obama's in the last 8 years, and all the terrible economic statistics caused by his failed policies and agendas have proven that, whether you want to accept it or not. I'll bet you are one of those that gives Bill Clinton credit for creating a great economy as all liberals have, and just because you claim you v**ed for President Trump instead of Hillary Clinton for the reason of the lesser evil, doesn't make you not a liberal, because there were many millions of Democrats that v**ed for President Trump because Hillary Clinton promised to continue all of Obama's failed policies and agendas.

Since President Trump signed 'Executive Orders' to repeal and reverse all of Obama's failed economic policies and agendas that Obama ordered through signing his own 'Executive Orders', those economic k*****g policies and agendas of Obama's have not been in effect since February, and has allowed President Trump to set the economy free, which now is on a pace of having a nearly yearly 4% positive GDP growth in our economy, more than doubling the best yearly positive GDP growth rate that Obama's failed economic policies and agendas had produced, that Obama inflicted on the economy through his 'Executive Orders', and ever allowed to occur.

Now you claim to be worried that President Trump's economic agenda will be good for only the wealthy 1% and devastating to lower income Americans, which in actuality was the only thing Obama's economic agenda was good for, was the wealthy 1% and devasting for the poor and middleclass, as allof Obama's economic statistics have proven. This is why the rich donated more money to Obama and the Democrats than have ever been put in any of our political e******ns at anytime before, and much more than the Republicans were given. Obama also falsely claimed (another of his many, many lies) that he would only accept small donations from the common man, when the huge percentage of his political donations came from the rich, Hollywood elite, and Wall Street Corporations, who are the definition of the wealthy 1%, and became much more wealthy during Obama's Presidency, while the common man suffered in Obama's stagnate economy that only benefitted those wealthy 1%ers.

President Trump's tax plan is not "highly slanted to cutting taxes at the very top", but gives the lowest income earners the highest percentages of tax cuts, the way we pay taxes through through graduated percentages of income, with the higher earners always paying the higher percentages, and the lower earners always paying the lower percentages of their incomes. You want people to believe because the smaller percentage of a tax cut to the higher earners provides a larger amount of money being returned to the higher earner tax payer only because he pays a lot more in taxes, than the higher percentage of tax cut to the lower earners provides a lower amount of money being returned to the lower earner tax payer only because he pays a lot less in taxes, is unfair and slanted toward the wealthiest 1%, which is a boldfaced lie. You are a socilistic c*******t who want the wealthy to pay all the taxes, and the rest of us to pay no taxes, which is not everyone paying their fair share, as you liberals always demand, as if that is not already occurring by the higher income earners paying a much higher percentage of their income in taxes, as does the lower income earner paying a lot lower percentage of their income in taxes, as our tax system is designed, which President Trump's tax plan adheres to, even when lowering all income earners taxes by the same graduated system, which in reality is not everyone paying their fair share, as half of the American people get all their income taxes returned to them, and half of those get more returned than they pay in.

Corporations are getting the greater tax cuts, but that is so they will have money to expand and grow their businesses, in order to create more jobs to put all the people that Obama had dropped from the 'US Workforce' in order to falsely lower the unemployment rate, and never added any of them back in to falsely keep the unemployment rate low, despite having claimed to have created 12 million jobs, which President Trump's plan allows all these coproarations to create enough jobs to put all those 17 million people that were dropped from the 'US Workforce' and caused it's participation rate to decline to a 40 year low, back to work.

But you Democrats now worry about the national debt and yearly deficits that President Trump's tax plan may cause to increase, yet you never cared or said anything about the $1.35 trillion averaged deficits in every one of Obama's years as President, more than doubling that national debt that took all our other Presidents 232 years to acquire, while no other President in US history even ever came close to having one year with a trillion dollar deficit, even during the 'Great Depression' or all the years that the US economy went into a recession, let alone during 8 straight years of an economic recovery that you, Obama, and all your Democratic ilk like to proclaim. Are you afraid of increased deficits and national debt, that you didn't fear when Obama was President and setting historically record high deficits and national debt amounts, or is it that you are scared to death that President Trump might be successful in "Making America Great Again", and in doping so will make all you liberals, progressives, and Democrats irellevant to the American people, and cause the Democrats to lose even more political seats than the over 1,300 political seats that they have lost to the Republicans all across the USA in Obama's last 8 years of a terrible supposed economic recovery, proven by all the terrible economic statistics that have been recorded by the federal government and is now part of US history?

You're so afraid of President Trump that you constantly and continuously attack him and all his proposed, and in the process of being instituted, policies and agendas, yet said nothing about 8 years of all of Obama's failed economic policies that the American people were forced to suffer under, which have been proven failures by the recorded economic statistics. Then when we both agreed that only time will tell the t***h about the successes or failures of President Trump, as it has the failures of Obama, yet you still can't shut up and let the process of time tell and prove all that we disagree about, to see who is correct about their projections. You also deny the historical facts about Obama's terrible economic record and attempt to get people to believe that President Trump's success in the last 9 months is only due to the failed policies and agendas of Obama, which President Trump has repealed and reversed back in January and February of this year, which is the reason behind the vibrant economy that President Trump has produced in only 9 months. This proves that you're just another liberal hypocrite that is full of hatred for President Trump, and can't stand to give him a chance to see if he is successful or not, because you fear that possibility that he will be successful, making everything you say so very and tremendously disingenuous and hypocritical.

Your attempt to turn the American people against President Trump is pathetic and also proven very hypocritical, using lies through unfounded projections in your attempt to scare people about what President Trump is accomplishing, which President Trump is now showing the American people that they suffered under Obama and the Democrats for 8 years needlessly, since the recession was really over starting 20 days before Obama became President, caused by Bush's policies and agendas, and then Obama and the Democrats created all this economic damage to the USA and the American people, with proven failed economic policies and agendas. People are learning about you very quickly, by what you agree on, but then refuse to stand by, and wait and see, as you said had to be done, to learn the real t***h of what will be successful, and what won't.
What is so laughable is that you imply you are an ... (show quote)


This really isn't particle physics.

People who lost jobs under Obama are going back to work under Trump. Consumer spending is up. People are beginning to see a future again. The economy is picking up.

This is what people will he have in their minds in 2018 and again in 2020, not the rhetoric from the left.

We are starting to climb from the hole Obama dug and the left knows it. That is why they are so afraid of Trump. He is showing the difference between left and right ideologies and making sure the v**ers see it.
Go to
Oct 20, 2017 01:13:37   #
BigMike wrote:
"And if it takes a national data base to ensure it, so be it."

That's just it. It shouldn't take a national database and if people on the federal level ever push it you can bet they'll use it for more than v**er identification.


They have all your info anyway. I think no one should have to declare a party affiliation. I don't see why the fed should be involved but it isn't a big deal to me if they did get into it. They already have more info on you than a v**er ID would contain so it would add nothing to their data.
Go to
Oct 20, 2017 01:02:44   #
http://www.wusa9.com/mobile/article/news/local/verify/verify-does-part-of-the-national-anthem-talk-about-the-death-of-s***es/484430099

This is what they are talking about and why it is irrelevant

It's interesting that at first the players said they were protesting police treatment of b****s and how it had nothing to do with the anthem or f**g, but after taking so much heat for their actions now there are people trying to say it's about our anthem.

This explains why they are wrong.


son of witless wrote:
You should be able to click on this link.

http://amhistory.si.edu/starspangledbanner/pdf/ssb_lyrics.pdf
Go to
Oct 19, 2017 19:28:26   #
rumitoid wrote:
Tomi Lahren: “It started with Colin Kaepernick, it has spread, it has infected the league - I would like to ask these players, what exactly are you kneeling for and why have you chosen the f**g and the anthem to do it?”

To answer Tomi's extremely dense and dim-witted question, Kaepernick said this around a year ago and was blackballed by the NFL for it:
“Specifically it’s police brutality. Cops are getting paid leave, for k*****g people and not being held accountable ― that’s not right.”
(A year ago and she and Fox News are still clueless after all that time covering Colin Kaepernick and the NFL protests hundreds of times this past year? Pretty much every player who’s knelt has been asked about why they’re protesting, so in fact, it would be really easy to check on. Never mind thousands of articles.)

How did the NYPD react to this accusation? Hundreds of NYPD officers took a knee in solidarity. (http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/nypd-cops-rally-support-colin-kaepernick-brooklyn-article-1.3425792) Why didn't Fox News attack them as being unpatriotic?

Are the thousands of veterans speaking out on social media about how these protesters have a right to take a knee not valid? (http://abcnews.go.com/US/veterans-knee-support-national-anthem-protests/story?id=50075609) Can't Fox News hear them? Most have said they served to protect the rights of Free Speech and peaceful protest. Why aren't they unpatriotic?

The inspiration to take knee was from Green Beret, Nate Boyer: "First thing Colin said when we met was: ‘I want you to know, I appreciate your service more than anything.’ I expressed to him maybe there’s a different way to demonstrate than sitting down, where you’re showing more respect for those that lay down their lives for what that f**g and anthem stands for. I suggested kneeling." Can you grasp that Tomi?
Tomi Lahren: “It started with Colin Kaepernick, it... (show quote)


Go Cubs.
Go to
Oct 19, 2017 01:23:36   #
BigMike wrote:
My point was that the Federal government needs no more databases on us than it already has. In fact, they should give back much of our privacy they've already taken.

DMV is already set up to issue IDs and register v**ers for that matter.

Do you want another layer of federal bureaucracy?


I don't see why it must be a national data base. It would be helpful to cross reference with. Each state could more easily handle this than the fed could and with far less foul ups.

The DMV handles licenses for all who wish to drive. They have the equipment to generate the v**er ID in house and only to those who wish to v**e. I see no reason not to do this. Each county has more than one office that could handle this.

At one point we will have to do something to stop v***r f***d. I do not want anyone not legally allowed to v**e to have a voice in ths direvtion of the country, state, county, city,....dog catcher.

And if it takes a national data base to ensure it, so be it. The alternative is much worse than any government involvement.

The alternative is to see illegal Muslim and Mexican v****g.take over our future.
Go to
Oct 18, 2017 21:48:56   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>>>>>>


The Thousands of emails, groups, strings, sites, blogs, etc... its the communication median of the new Age Doc.

You dont need to listen to T.V. Or the Scumbag Z*****t CryptoJew RAT MSM

Theyve been pumping you guys full of s**t lies for 85+ years...its over

Connect the dots if you can between Propaganda War 101, MSM, FBI, FED etc... they all circle the wagons and suck off each others tweets.

They seriously believe you are GOY, Stupid and exist for the Slaughter to advance their Z*****t TelAviv Vision of World Dominance...

They slaughtered 58 of your Christian brothers n sisters in Cold Blood in the Dead of Night on Film....and you guys still can’t wake up
Still can’t see it
Still do nothing !
>>>>>>>>> br br br Th... (show quote)


And again, you assume that if one doesn't joyfully jump on your bandwagon, that they disagree with you. You are behaving foolishly and it is counterproductive to your desired goal.

Sici, if.you are serious about trying to do something for this nation, you will need to stop the sabre rattling all the time. You are completely subjective and you are throwing your credibility down the drain. If anything, you are pushing people toward what you are against.

I'm trying to help you here. At the rate you're going, it won't be long before you'll have labeled yourself as a crackpot and no one will pay you attention after that.

Example:
You say thousands of emails and messages, then you say 50 million people. Thousands do not equate to millions.

You are running away with yourself. Try to reign it in.
Go to
Oct 18, 2017 21:34:06   #
son of witless wrote:
Sorry. We all make controversial comments on here. When I do, I either apologize or I post evidence. I can't let this go. I want to know where in the Star Spangled Banner this is.


The 3rd verse mentions hirelings and s***es. Not in any demeaning manner at all.

The 4th verse mentions freemen. Not as s***e owners but as men not under the thumb of the crown.

Liberals spin this and try to say it disrespects b****s.

The only disrespect here is by the liberals disrespecting everyone's intelligence hoping this lame ignorant accusation will convince someone.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 1096 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.