One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jeff smith
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 239 next>>
Feb 14, 2022 17:31:07   #
yep as usual you spew out some whoopers kevie.
i don't think you would know the t***h if it kicked you right square in the donkey.
Go to
Feb 14, 2022 17:27:49   #
336Robin wrote:
Before the creation of the Fox News, Brietbart and Pundits
everyone got the same t***hful news.

Now the right has a misinformation network that is the propaganda machine for the cult they've morphed into.

I have to wonder if its time to launch a series of children's book aimed at spreading the same kind of disinformation they've picked up from the Q***n crap only write them as Childrens books for Adults and aim them at the same adults that believe the scoop from their disinformation network.

They will believe anything so what would be wrong with fighting fire with fire?

What stories could you fabricate around actual events that would be believable? This could be a lot of fun!
Before the creation of the Fox News, Brietbart and... (show quote)


so . so very ODD .
hasn't your liberal propagandist informed you dem followers that, one FBI lawyer, one hitlary lawyer that worked at the campaign AND a Russian living in America have been INDICTED for LYING to the FISA court and/or the FBI ?
AND, now from the D****m r****t they have found quite a lot of juicy info about the DNC who went as far as hiring a computer wiz who h**ed President Trump, to HAK into his servers while campaigning AND after he was elected.
keep your eyes and ears open you dem followers can you hear the bimbo dominos falling over ?
oooooooo such a sweet sound it will be. ESPECIALY IF THEY CAN GET THE WICKED THING HERSELF.
liar , liar , it's a wonder her pants aint caught fier.
Go to
Jan 4, 2022 14:09:51   #
rumitoid wrote:
Bullies are easy to h**e, fear and condemn. But why are they as they are? Some, like me once, would say when confronted with their documented abuse, who cares. They are just wrong and bad. They deserve punishment and shunning. They are a toxic stain on thousands of innocent lives in our school system. Yet I feel that, like me, and many others would be shocked and greatly dismayed by their childhoods. Savage! Mean-spirited! Ugly!

I recently heard a lot of their stories in a special Behavioral Health project as an alternative to Juvenile Detention for their actions. The treatment they were receiving there helped them to uncover the sources of their anger and acting out. It was overwhelming. Hard to imagine why they weren't worse than their alleged crimes.

But for justice for their harm done, despite what should be mitigating factors, they are judged; anything less would seem unjust. Schools need to employ well-trained Mental Health workers to identify early and offer counseling for those children so terribly broken. And their status should change. They are not bullies or trouble-makers but seriously troubled and in desperate need of our dedicated care and attention. Or we wait to the ten year reunion and exact our revenge by our success. Tempting.
Bullies are easy to h**e, fear and condemn. But wh... (show quote)


sorry but i do not agree with your bleeding heart comments.
you can go into any prison and find the majority of inmates have had a sad or bad childhood.
there are programs within the system for people to involve themselves in.
but the most of them have EGOS that are so big, they wont.
if a person commits a crime, there are laws to determine what is to be done for committing the crime.
Go to
Jan 4, 2022 13:49:16   #
kemmer wrote:
Tell that to Fox; they’ve been spewing lies for 4 years and they continue to do so.


that's odd. it was ALL of the liberal media who kept screaming GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, at every comment stated by the b.n.c.p. the Russian collusion case even after 4 investigations, over every investigation the b.n.c.p. brought up during the 4 years of President Trump's era and the two pretenses of an impeachment .
YET FOX news was on the money when it came to all of it.
you followers of the b.n.c.p. are so BLIND that you would follow them things off the side of a mountain if they lead you up there.
Go to
Jan 4, 2022 13:34:32   #
Kevyn wrote:
They own the platform they can publish or not publish wh**ever they want. The best way to not be kept off the platforms is to tell the t***h.


to these platforms, the t***h does not matter, if it does not agree with their agenda
Go to
Jan 4, 2022 13:31:12   #
Milosia2 wrote:
Sarah K. Burris
January 04, 2022

'I thought it was a joke': Melania Trump selling off her stuff causes questions about her cash needs
First Lady Melania Trump wearing a "pith helmet" during her trip to Africa.

Former First Lady Melania Trump offered up a new non-fungible token (NFT) piece of artwork last week and this week she's selling the hat she wore during an official state visit to the U.S. by French President Emmanuel Macron. She has also autographed the hat for the buyer and the prices start at $250,000.

Mrs. Trump, a former model, focused a lot on her fashion while in the White House. She is the first among the first ladies to auction off her belongings, though she says that a "portion" of the funds will go to her "Be Best" campaign's foster care initiative, which aimed to fight bullying.

It's unknown if the former first lady intends to offer any additional auction items in the future. The auction runs through Jan. 25.


The auction prompted confusion and frustration from those online. Some thought it wasn't a real news story. Others speculated whether the funds would truly go to charity, highlighting the "portion" part of her statement. Many noted that the move was another example of the Trump family grifting off of their time in the White House.

Suspicion is reasonable given the track record of the Trump family charity that had to be shut down due to fraud. Trump used the 501(c)3 to get associates to donate to causes and then he would cut a check to the charity, taking a considerable amount off the top.

In one incident, Eric Trump took funds that were meant for the children's cancer charity, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis. While saying that the Trump properties were all free to use for charitable events, it turns out they profited $1.2 million off of the fundraiser, reported Forbes. The 2019 report resulted in an investigation from the New York attorney general.

In another case, former President Donald Trump claimed in 2016 he would host a veterans charity event instead of attending a p**********l debate. The funds weren't sent to the charities he promised until after reports became public that he hadn't sent the groups any money. Ultimately, a judge ordered the Trump Foundation to pay out $2 million to charities and close the foundation.
Sarah K. Burris br January 04, 2022 br br 'I tho... (show quote)


worry wart
Go to
Jan 4, 2022 13:30:16   #
American Vet wrote:


that's a good one
Go to
Jan 4, 2022 13:20:49   #
Capt-jack wrote:
The US Could Be Under ‘Right-Wing Dictatorship’ by 2030, Professor Warns, lol, that's how the C****e stay in power, just tell BS lies and we buy it all the time.

A Canadian professor (left winger) wrote an op-ed warning that “American democracy could collapse” by 2025 and the country “could be governed by a right-wing dictatorship” by 2030.

“By 2025, American democracy could collapse, causing extreme domestic political instability, including widespread civil violence. By 2030, if not sooner, the country could be governed by a right-wing dictatorship,” wrote Thomas Homer-Dixon, executive director of the Cascade Institute at Royal Roads University in British Columbia.

Homer-Dixon, a self-proclaimed “scholar of violent conflict,” warned Canadians that their country must be prepared as the U.S. seems headed toward inevitable political collapse.

“We mustn’t dismiss these possibilities just because they seem ludicrous or too horrible to imagine. In 2014, the suggestion that Donald Trump would become president would also have struck nearly everyone as absurd. But today we live in a world where the absurd regularly becomes real and the horrible commonplace,” Homer-Dixon wrote.

“Today, as I watch the unfolding crisis in the United States, I see a political and social landscape flashing with warning signals.”

The political science professor went on the write that the U.S. is “becoming increasingly ungovernable, and some experts believe it could descend into civil war.”

“A terrible storm is coming from the south, and Canada is woefully unprepared. Over the past year we’ve turned our attention inward, distracted by the challenges of C****-**, reconciliation and the accelerating effects of c*****e c****e,” he wrote.

Homer-Dixon sounds the alarm on the possibility of another Trump presidency in 2024, saying it could spell trouble for America’s neighbor to the north.

“But now we must focus on the urgent problem of what to do about the likely unraveling of democracy in the United States. We need to start by fully recognizing the magnitude of the danger. If Mr. Trump is re-elected, even under the more optimistic scenarios the economic and political risks to our country will be innumerable.”

The professor says Trump “and a host of acolytes and wannabes such as Fox [News]’s Tucker Carlson and Georgia representative Marjorie Taylor Greene” t***sformed the Republican party “into a near-f*****t personality cult that’s a perfect instrument for wrecking democracy.”

Though Homer-Dixon issued a dire warning for what may happen following a 2024 victory for the former president, he says “Trump may be just a warm-up act.”

“Returning to office, [Trump will] be the wrecking ball that demolishes democracy, but the process will produce a political and social shambles. Still, through targeted harassment and dismissal, he’ll be able to thin the ranks of his movement’s opponents within the state – the bureaucrats, officials, and technocrats who oversee the non-partisan functioning of core institutions and abide by the rule of law. Then the stage will be set for a more managerially competent ruler, after Mr. Trump, to bring order to the chaos he’s created.”

Seems Thomas Homer-Dixon is oblivious to all of the illegal mandates imposed on America by Biden and his Democrats is not a Dictator? Mr. Biden has violated many Supreme Court rulings as well.
Plus, allowing an army of people to invade America carrying many diseases! ALL IMPEACHABLE
The US Could Be Under ‘Right-Wing Dictatorship’ by... (show quote)


i wonder about what these lefties are saying. what i see is that the left IS doing, what they claim the right is doing.
trying to take firearms away from law abiding citizens.
using fear tactics to close down the economy.
open boarders to flood the country with prospective dem v**ers.
trying to federalize e******ns.
trying to appease our enemies to be nice .
begging Russia and OPEC to sell America more oil.
do as i say, not as i do
Go to
Jan 2, 2022 18:08:54   #
pegw wrote:
Personally I am waiting untill she comes down with C***d. She is probably going to go into the house chambers if she doesn't feel too bad.
She has over $100,000 in fines because she refused to wear a mask when she is in the house chambers.


sound like a dead beat dem. don't get what you want so you throw a hissy fit .
Go to
Jan 2, 2022 16:32:15   #
Bad Bob wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/liz-cheney-ivanka-trump-j***6-180222954.html


SO WHAT. just more of your dem propagandist writings .
them people have lied to the nation for over 5 years , and you still want to believe their telling you t***h .
ha ha ha .
would you believe it if i wanted to sell you some ocean front property in north east Arizona ?
Go to
Jan 1, 2022 23:09:29   #
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
Why do we never hear about what's going on in Antarctica?


uncertain.
i did see a short news clip that showed what looked like a big sink hole .
but i bumped a button and lost the rest of the video .
Go to
Dec 31, 2021 18:03:39   #
Bad Bob wrote:
You call this NOTHING???















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































The Special Counsel investigation uncovered extensive criminal activity
The investigation produced 37 indictments; seven guilty pleas or convictions; and compelling evidence that the president obstructed justice on multiple occasions. Mueller also uncovered and referred 14 criminal matters to other components of the Department of Justice.
Trump associates repeatedly lied to investigators about their contacts with Russians, and President Trump refused to answer questions about his efforts to impede federal proceedings and influence the testimony of witnesses.
A statement signed by over 1,000 former federal prosecutors concluded that if any other American engaged in the same efforts to impede federal proceedings the way Trump did, they would likely be indicted for multiple charges of obstruction of justice.
You call this NOTHING??? br br br br br br b... (show quote)


this is all B.S. put out by the bimbos propaganda machine . and as usual you and the dem cronies that follow all eat it up like steak and eggs . gobble , gobble eat it all up .
Go to
Dec 31, 2021 17:57:37   #
[quote=rumitoid]Jill Lawrence, USA TODAY
Fri, December 3, 2021, 7:33 PM

[Read all of this article, if you dare, and have some in-depth and honest self-examination. PLEASE!

t’s been an intense life-and-death week in America: Four teenagers are k**led in a school shooting, the Supreme Court debates a******n, a new C***D strain arrives – and none of the arguments over any of it make political or constitutional or public health sense.

If you’re “pro-life,” why not support reasonable gun restrictions? Why not support C***D v*****es to save lives, including your own? If you think the Constitution gives you the right to control your own body, why oppose v*****e mandates but require people to bear children? If you believe in the constitutional principle of religious freedom, why support repeal of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision establishing the right to a******n? Not all religions hold that life begins at conception, nor do all Americans. In fact, only 38% agree with that.

The most visceral of the three big developments is the Michigan shooting. Who could read about the four slain students without crying? This is a tragedy all parents can feel in their bones, a tragedy you can never get over.
Conceptual children vs. real ones

Losing a child in a school shooting is not the same as aborting a fetus at 8 or 12 or 16 or 20 weeks. It is not the same as taking medical advice to end a late-term non-viable pregnancy when carrying to term would risk your life or health.

Those are potential children, conceptual children. They do have their own power, their own hold on the imagination and heart; I know because I had a miscarriage and it was emotionally painful. But that is not the same as children with hopes, dreams, personalities and plans.

A study published last year tells the story. Contacted every six months for five years after an a******n, over 95% of women said it was the right decision – including those who found the initial decision difficult. The most prominent emotion throughout the five-year period was relief.

So much for the “a******n regrets” narrative. It’s largely fiction, just like “guns don’t k**l people” and “thoughts and prayers” are stand-ins for better laws and better enforcement of those we already have. Maybe if religious figures preached gun control, the odds would improve.

C***D is the latest example of the Ghoulish Old Party’s tragic indifference to the health and safety of others. Exhibit A is former President Donald Trump, who has put many at risk of C***D and may himself have spread it.

The C***D carnage arising from his April rally in Tulsa included at least eight staffers, according to “Betrayed,” by Jonathan Karl. One of them almost died. One of Trump’s most prominent supporters, age 74 and maskless at the rally, actually did die. “We k**led Herman Cain,” a senior aide told ABC News reporter Will Steakin, according to Karl.

Trump was positive, negative and positive in a series of C***D tests from Sept. 26 (three days before his debate with Joe Biden) to Oct. 1. He not only attended the debate during that period, he made an unmasked appearance with Gold Star families and spoke to reporters on Air Force One, possibly infecting New York Times reporter Michael Shear. Shortly before the first test, he hosted a packed Rose Garden party – a superspreader event – for then-Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett.

That’s the same Amy Coney Barrett who suggested Wednesday that a******n is unnecessary because women can give up their babies for adoption. Except that, as lawyers defending Roe v. Wade pointed out, it is wrenching to give up a baby (more so than having an a******n, research has found) and there are health risks to pregnancy itself, especially in Mississippi and especially for minorities. Beyond that, limiting or outlawing a******ns doesn’t reduce them, it just makes them less safe.
The ideal world we can't have

Roe v. Wade doesn’t force anyone to have or not have an a******n. In an ideal world, it would endure. In the real world, a high court majority is likely to hand a******n regulation power to the states – and women living in some of them won’t be free to control their own bodies, look out for their own health, or act on their own religious and moral beliefs.

In an ideal world, the Michigan massacre never would have happened, and Congress would have long ago passed a major bill doing everything possible to prevent such tragedies. In the real world, the best we can hope for is accountability. The prosecutor there made a start by charging not just the 15-year-old suspect, who faces four counts of first-degree murder and 20 other charges, but also his parents, who were charged with four counts of involuntary manslaughter apiece.

We can also hope Congress does what it should have done years ago. At the very least, send GOP Sen. Pat Toomey into his retirement next year with a victory – passage of the very modest gun background check expansion that he negotiated with Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin and that failed to pass in 2013, a few months after a shooter mowed down six adults and 20 little children at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

Finally, in an ideal world, the political theatrics, misinformation and lying about v*****es and public health precautions would stop, and Americans would do what President Joe Biden suggested Thursday: in the face of the omicron variant, finally unite to fight C***D. “Think of it in terms of literally a patriotic responsibility,” he said.

That’s a wish, not a reality. But in a season associated with generosity and caring, it’s worth a try.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/guns-a******n-c***d-america-life-005223194.html[/quote]

because your full of it. c***d , a******ns and the 2nd amendment have NOTHING IN COMMON . EXCEPT to a bunch of bleeding heart liberals
Go to
Dec 31, 2021 17:14:35   #
Bad Bob wrote:
https://www.politicususa.com/2021/12/04/former-federal-prosecutor-kirschner-guarantees-trump-prosecution-on-evidence-available.html


how many times are you poor , poor dem followers going to fall for such B.S.?
you can't see what their doing can you ?
of all the things they , the b.n.c.p. , have said he did or tried to convince the public of . how many wound up in the file marked NOTHING HERE box ?
look at who is censoring speach .
look at who is doing every thing they can to DENY law abiding citizens the right to bear arms
look at who is in VIOLATION of federal laws and opened the southern boarder .
Go to
Dec 31, 2021 16:55:33   #
Kevyn wrote:
Since May 2021, people living in counties that v**ed heavily for Donald Trump during the last p**********l e******n have been nearly three times as likely to die from C****-** as those who live in areas that went for now-President Biden. That's according to a new analysis by NPR that examines how political polarization and misinformation are driving a significant share of the deaths in the p******c.

NPR looked at deaths per 100,000 people in roughly 3,000 counties across the U.S. from May 2021, the point at which v******tions widely became available. People living in counties that went 60% or higher for Trump in November 2020 had 2.7 times the death rates of those that went for Biden. Counties with an even higher share of the v**e for Trump saw higher C****-** mortality rates.
In October, the reddest tenth of the country saw death rates that were six times higher than the bluest tenth.
Since May 2021, people living in counties that v**... (show quote)


i quoted a test was as full of B.S. as a 200 year old bull pin .
you take the cake over that . i think your more full of it than a pin that's been around sense time began .
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 239 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.