One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Dummy Boy
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 766 next>>
Dec 17, 2017 09:42:28   #
BigMike wrote:
I'm gonna start posting these things when I find them for the benefit of any ideologues who might be wavering between common sense and insanity.

This goes on all day every day everywhere.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/suicide-bombers-attack-church-in-pakistan-k*****g-8/ar-BBGRt18?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp


I broadly believe that when people mention that Christians are being persecuted, they are talking about the US, not Pakistan, Russia or China.

There is no denying the Christians are being persecuted, especially when they are a religious minority.

...but go right ahead and post this, but my concern only extends as far as the constitution, and since Pakistan doesn't comply to the US Constitution-it matters not, unless YOU personally are going to Pakistan and take them to court to straighten this out. It has been a Muslim State for many, many years. I wouldn't expect Christians to be treated fairly, where they can't be treated fairly.
Go to
Dec 17, 2017 09:15:07   #
11r20 wrote:
Geez... Jerry Lee Lewis Married his 13 year old cousin and No One Gave a Damn.
And nowadays anonymous Bimbos are paid Big Money
to lie about anyone the deep state wants them to "With Our Tax Money".

See how this works?


I disagree, his career went in the toilet, with the exception of the south. My parents, were told by their parents that they weren't allowed to listen to his music anymore.
Go to
Dec 17, 2017 09:12:01   #
PoppaGringo wrote:
Being the progeny of an incestuous relationship should make you an authority on the subject.


...which you comprehend, because of your own conception and perverse existence?....
Go to
Dec 17, 2017 09:11:07   #
PoppaGringo wrote:
Not only are you dumb, but profoundly stupid, for which there is no cure. So just keep trolling for your own amusement.


You demonstrate a similar detachment from intelligence. Is the first amendment complicated and may be, it isn't. It is most amusing to listen to you waffle and project ad hominems to protect you hegemony, that never existed and by further posturing you are destroying the weak hold that the church has on society, because people actually read and assimilate information for all to see.

Yes, indeed, there is "no cure" for me, sorry, but you can distribute your crap some place else.

Let's just consider marriage in the US and how it doesn't comply to Judaic/Christian rules, shall we:

A. Marriage in the United States shall consist of a union between one man and one or more women. (Gen 29:17-28; II Sam 3:2-5) Please note that NOTHING in the Old or New Testament condemns polygamy. Polyandry, though (i.e., a woman taking more than one husband) is an a*********n.

B. Marriage shall not impede a man's right to take concubines in addition to his wife or wives. (II Sam 5:13; I Kings 11:3; II Chron 11:21)

C. A marriage shall be considered valid only if the wife is a virgin. If the wife is not a virgin, she shall be executed. (Deut 22:13-21)

D. Marriage of a believer and a non-believer shall be forbidden. (Gen 24:3; Num 25:1-9; Ezra 9:12; Neh 10:30) Also, to bolster this assertion, the New Testament plainly states that Christians ought not "yoke themselves unto unbelievers" (2 Cor. 6:14). Therefore, all mixed marriages must be declared null and void -- period, end of discussion.

E. Since marriage is for life, neither this Constitution nor the constitution of any State, nor any state or federal law, shall be construed to permit divorce. (Deut 22:19; Mark 10:9) Exceptions MIGHT be made for husbands to "put away" their wives in case of adultery, but even that's kinda iffy. All this "Well, he beats me black and blue" crap just doesn't hold water with the word of God.

F. If a married man dies without children, his brother shall marry the widow. If he refuses to marry his brother's widow or deliberately does not give her children, he shall pay a fine of one shoe and be otherwise punished in a manner to be determined by law. (Gen. 38:6-10; Deut 25:5-10) I'm sure that Payless and Thom McAn will be happy to hear about the shoe thing.

G. In lieu of marriage, if there are no acceptable men in your town, it is required that you get your dad drunk and have sex with him (even if he had previously offered you up as a sex toy to men young and old), tag-teaming with any sisters you may have. Of course, this rule applies only if you are female. (Gen 19:31-36)

It looks to me like the Constitution and State Laws are in fact NON-BIBLICAL and therefore DO NOT COMPLY to Judaic/Christian principles, values and so on and so forth. With the exception of divorce it looks like none of these VALUES would or could substitute for anyone's morals or common sense, would you agree?
Go to
Dec 17, 2017 09:05:37   #
Kazudy wrote:
Let me take a guess, I would say that at least 75% of the American people consider themselves Judeo-Christian. Our freedom of religion is being eroded. Let's think about this for a minute, who is behind that?


Where do KNOW where your freedom to practice religion is being prohibited?
Go to
Dec 16, 2017 08:50:08   #
Larry the Legend wrote:
This is not about contraceptives per se, this is about government forcing people to pay for others' contraceptive use.

"Beetlestone, appointed to the bench by Obama, called the Trump administration's exemptions "sweeping" and said they are the 'proverbial exception that swallows the rule.'"

"She was particularly critical of the power to object on moral grounds, saying it 'conjured up a world where a government entity is empowered to impose its own version of morality on each one of us. That cannot be right.'"

It never ends. We're going to be dealing with these 'Obama holdovers' for the next 40 freaking years. 'Itchy' yet?
This is not about contraceptives per se, this is a... (show quote)


...so you think, "forcing" kids to be v******ted is equally bad?
Go to
Dec 16, 2017 08:49:12   #
Liberty Tree wrote:
Proper behavior and respect for life almost completely does away with a******ns.


...and yet our military is prefer all kinds death and misery in a part of the world that isn't our problem...

Otherwise, good point.
Go to
Dec 16, 2017 08:43:47   #
eagleye13 wrote:
Actually we are a Christian nation, and will always be a Christian nation.
Other religions are here by Christian grace and hospitality.
That may have been a mistake.


No, we aren't. We are a secular nation, since the government has not established a state religion, nor can it, since the first amendment prohibits that.

...and the other religions that are "here" are protected by the first amendment.

The only mistake that exists is that YOU think that we are a Christian Nation.
Go to
Dec 16, 2017 08:41:39   #
PoppaGringo wrote:
You are sorely lacking in comprehension. Nowhere did I state we are any type of religion. What I aid was, we were FOUNDED on Judean/Christian morals and principles, not the religion. Sheesh...


You are also, sadly lacking in comprehension: Provide that "walk" that we were FOUNDED on Judaic/Christian moral and principles. Which is what I asked originally.
Go to
Dec 16, 2017 08:38:38   #
kcstargoat wrote:
I've never been married, but in my 63 years have flirted, touched, kissed and told lewd jokes to my share of women. Never been accused of sexual harassment or assault! I think this hysteria over politicians and actors sexual behavior towards women is a few too true and most pure malarkey! You can't start the engine without the starter! Men and women have been doing the sexual dance since the dawn of time. Otherwise there would be 10 million people on this blue and green marble we call home.
I've never been married, but in my 63 years have f... (show quote)


...sometimes, that dance turns into unwanted advances. It's isn't on women to understand how men think, men should be responsible enough, to proceed to a dance and that's all it is: a dance. It doesn't mean they want to hop into to be with you, it means they want to dance. And if you can show enough constraint, it might work out for you. Why would any woman want to be with a man who has no self control?
Go to
Dec 16, 2017 08:35:13   #
PoppaGringo wrote:
The mall manager stated there was never a directive about Moore in regards to the mall. That big lie has been debunked numerous times. Don't get all your 'news' from CNN, MSNBC, et al. They have been proven to be unreliable too many times.


We'll see, hopefully, a hearing is in order to completely destroy the putz, because that's what he is: he's a putz.
Go to
Dec 15, 2017 20:11:08   #
Hardwork1 wrote:
The Left is Eating its Own, But Are They Actually just the Left’s Sacrificial Lambs?
As I watched the news and read various internet articles over the last few days I could not avoid wondering if America can be saved from the Left? Is the Left’s open hatred for America and their corruption so deeply embedded in our Government that America cannot survive? I say this even after the recent news about a number of high ranking DOJ and FBI officials being demoted for displaying open support for Hillary and open hatred for President Trump, I want to place emphasis on the word “demoted”, they were not fired!

Here are some examples of the Left’s hatred for Trump and their corruption in our government that recently became public:

• Peter Strzok was a ranking FBI agent involved in Hillary’s emailgate investigation. He is the person who changed the wording in Comey’s written report closing the investigation into Hillary’s mishandling of State Department communications.. He changed the language from “grossly negligent” to “extremely carless” which eliminated a key word that would have made her actions more prosecutable.
• Strzok was also assigned to Mueller’s investigation into alleged Trump staff Russia collusion involving the November P**********l e******n. He was dropped from this investigation after an internal FBI probe revealed over 10,000 text messages he exchanged with his “girlfriend” that were d********g on many levels and, I believe Un-American to the point of being treasonous in some instances. He even went so far as to say that if Trump somehow got elected he had an “alternate” plan to prevent him from serving. Strzok actually referenced the plan that ”his girlfriend” mentioned when they were discussing the e******n in “Andy’s Office”. Strzok’s “girlfriend is Lisa Page who is also an FBI agent,
• The “Andy” Strzok referred to is Andrew McCabe the acting FBI director after Comey was fired. McCabe’s wife ran an unsuccessful campaign for a Virginia state senate seat using over $500,000 of campaign funding provided by Terry McAuliffe, a ranking member of the Clinton “political machine”. McCabe was also heavily involved in the Clinton emailgate investigation.
• Bruce G. Ohr was a ranking DOJ official who actually held two different DOJ positions at the same time. He was removed from the top ranked position recently when it was revealed that he had been involved with the “Fusion GPS” group and his wife actually worked for the group. “Fusion GPS” is the group that created the false Trump Russia collision dossier, which was largely funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. The FBI, during Obama’s last months in office actually used parts of this dossier to convince a FISA judge to issue a warrant allowing them to wiretap Trump staff members. The Obama Administration staff who asked for the warrant were ranking DOJ and FBI lawyers. They had to make three trips to the FISA court before they found a judge who would give them what they wanted.

As I watched the Congressional hearing on December 13 where Assistant AG Rosenstein was supposed to be briefing the committee on the status of the Mueller Russia collusion investigation, I got so disgusted with the Democrats on the committee that I had to turn the TV off. While I watched and listened to the hearing I did not hear a single Democrat use their time to do anything except attack President Trump and his supporters. Based on my observations the only thing that was accomplished in that hearing was a public display of just how deep the Left’s hatred is for President Trump and his supporters who desire to “make America Great again”. The time I spent watching this hearing is what solidified my concerns about the future of America and made me wonder if the people noted above, who were demoted, not fired, were nothing more than temporary “sacrificial lambs”?
The Left is Eating its Own, But Are They Actually ... (show quote)


Who's eating their own, how 'bout all the Republicans that keep flip flopping about Moore and Trump, the Democrats have the market cornered, and why would you care. Is it that funny?
Go to
Dec 15, 2017 20:02:34   #
PoppaGringo wrote:
The country was founded on Christian/Judean morals and principles.


Where is that written, which amendment?

..."The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It forbids Congress from both promoting one religion over others and also restricting an individual’s religious practices.

That is the only mention...no where is Christian or Judaic mentioned, in the constitution...or the laws. Because we don't live in a Theocracy.
Go to
Dec 15, 2017 20:00:33   #
PoppaGringo wrote:
Since you are so well versed on the subject, why don't you explain it?


Read for yourself:

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/locals-were-troubled-by-roy-moores-interactions-with-teen-girls-at-the-gadsden-mall

..."This past weekend, I spoke or messaged with more than a dozen people—including a major political figure in the state—who told me that they had heard, over the years, that Moore had been banned from the mall because he repeatedly badgered teen-age girls. Some say that they heard this at the time, others in the years since. These people include five members of the local legal community, two cops who worked in the town, several people who hung out at the mall in the early eighties, and a number of former mall employees. (A request for comment from the Moore campaign was not answered.) Several of them asked that I leave their names out of this piece. The stories that they say they’ve heard for years have been swirling online in the days since the Post published its report. “Sources tell me Moore was actually banned from the Gadsden Mall and the YMCA for his inappropriate behavior of soliciting sex from young girls,” the independent Alabama journalist Glynn Wilson wrote on his Web site on Sunday. (Wilson declined to divulge his sources.) Teresa Jones, a deputy district attorney for Etowah County in the early eighties, told CNN last week that “it was common knowledge that Roy dated high-school girls.” Jones told me that she couldn’t confirm the alleged mall banning, but said, “It’s a rumor I’ve heard for years.”
Go to
Dec 15, 2017 19:57:57   #
PoppaGringo wrote:
WTH are you mumbling about?


What are you mumbling about?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 766 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.