One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Richard Mondale
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 19 next>>
Jan 1, 2018 20:55:14   #
Floyd Brown wrote:
Of course you are right.

The real cost to us is in the tax laws that favor taxes on money.

Taxes on money...you know what, I like that. the Fed is trouble. It is a private entity. It works for itself. Is that good? Well, if we tax t***sfers?
What I propose is when money is removed from FDIC Insured instrument the tax is taken. What that does is, the entire budget is paid for by the money system so the rest of the economy does not have to, and the FED is suppressed by the load.
Go to
Jan 1, 2018 19:40:31   #
Radiance3 wrote:
=======================
This is a dummy left political assessment to ruinning the merits of this tax reform.
1. First dumb LIE stated here is, it will cost a $1 trillion per year.
2. The second lie is asking what you've earned and what you've spent, whether deductible. Double standard deduction benefits the lower income, mostly the middle class. Property taxes, and state income taxes are still deductible to $10,000. While mortgage interest are deductible up to a loan of $1 million. That is a generous benefit for the upper middle income, including double standard deduction.

Facts: Analysis on this tax reform of lowering taxes to the Middle Class, and corporate tax, will result to $1.5 trillion deficit for a period of 10 years, NOT 1 year as this dummy had reported. Next, assessment of what you earned versus what you've spent.
First, legally, not all expenses are deducted from your income for tax purposes. There are specific guidelines of what are deductible expenses from income and what are not. If you earn money then spend most of it for anything you've desired, not all your expenses cannot be deducted from your income for taxable purposes.

It is a DUMB democrat assessment. Because they are used to handouts and free loading not knowing what are the legal laws of taxation, because they never pay any taxes.

The deficit result of $1.5 trillion for 10 years, will be offset by the growth of employment, and corporate income resulting to more tax revenue collected because the employed will be paying taxes, as opposed to the policy of the democrats of feeding them and raising them like hordes of useless people sucking money from those who pay taxes.

Corporations and other businesses will grow thus resulting to paying more taxes. In addition, those US companies now in foreign countries will be coming home induced by low taxes, thus they pay income taxes to the IRS, and employ people to run their businesses. These added employed will then earn money paying taxes, which are Federal Income tax, Social Security Tax, Medicare Tax, Unemployment tax, and on the state and city level, they pay sales tax or state income tax. It is a chain movement of development where the people, the companies, and everybody will be productive contributing to the economy. When they have work and have money, they buy or spend more thus stimulating our economy.
Medicare and Social Security for retirees will be solvent again because more employed pay taxes.

Whereas policies of the democrats is by spending government money, expanding government, expanding millions of free loaders including those corrupt i*****l a***ns and terrorists Islam to be feed by us. That is what the democrats expand because these people are their V**ERS. The only way they could win the e******n. They don't care of whether these people produce or not, or develop and use any potential of their lives. The democrats make them dependent, useless, complainers and r****rs. Their lives are not used to produce, thus living with no dignity, and respect, but complainers of r****m, to satisfy their greed of being hungry suckers. Violence follow!

The more democrats have these free loader kinds of people, and depending on those who work, the better for the democrats for winning the e******n.
======================= br This is a dummy left po... (show quote)

I am glad you know that. You have outlined the new tax system and a few other things, but what I am talking about is the fact that it cost $1 to collect $3. My advocacy is that we should adopt a system with a lower, hopefully zero, cost. What is your complaint about that? Additionally you called me a lib. Don't do that. I wish to bridge the divide between left and right. I wish to usurp the lib v**er base.
Go to
Jan 1, 2018 09:38:27   #
steve66613 wrote:
Uh....what am I missing here? What “costs us $1 Trillion per year”? We’re not paying the government....it’s a reduction in taxes....you know: like you’re not paying them. The government was never going to give anyone a trillion dollars. Well, not regarding the subject of a tax cut.

I am referring to the Calculation cost, which is $500 Billion, plus the fact that Income Tax is a business cost, and so appears in the bottom line price of the product (embedded cost) which is then carried with it into the export market where it devastates our order book. Our products carry a price 30% or so higher than products from countries that use Value added Tax. Plus VAT is added to our products when they arrive in such a foreign country. (tax upon our tax) I am guessing that the profit lose on this is another $500 Billion for a total of $1 Trillion. The tarp fund, which was supposed to be large enough to head off the Obama Depression was a massive $700 Billion, to be applied to the Grass Roots, to stimulate the economy by accessing the multiplier effect. The above described savings would be realized by the citizens (grass roots) every year. It is the worlds largest unfunded Federal Mandate, and no body is talking about it.
Go to
Dec 31, 2017 23:03:27   #
The new Tax Reform Bill will not effect the savings that it could. Every one is focused on the length of the form and the difficulty of filling it out. That is not the major cost. The major cost is the obligation to know what you earned, what it was spent on, and whether that could be deductible. This costs us $1 Trillion per year. Imagine if we had that cash for our selves. What a fabulous stimulant that would be, every year.
Go to
Dec 31, 2017 10:06:09   #
PLT Sarge wrote:
Hey man, no one state or person can lay claim to having the best BBQ. Bring me a live pig, goat, calf or most anything else a month before you want to eat it. I'll put it up, feed it sweet corn and molasses let it clean out and fatten up. Dress it out, rub it down with my own spices. Let it just sit there for a few days. Dig a pit, line it, set the coals and keep the fire low. That may take a couple days. Then put the critter in the ground, lightly cover it up so you can control the coals. The best time to cook is at night. That way you can sit around the pit drinking and smelling that sweet pig cookin.
l
Hey man, no one state or person can lay claim to h... (show quote)

Keep my meat Grass Fed!
Go to
Dec 31, 2017 10:00:17   #
archie bunker wrote:
Nice unit!👍👍I have one similar out in the yard only not as big. We call it an offset smoker here in Texas. I also have a Treager pellet grill that is electric, computerized and all that. I rarely use it because it's c***ting imo.
And I never, ever grill, or smoke with gas! It's either charcoal, or misquite wood, or both.

I'm gonna fire mine up around 10:00. I've got a rack of baby backs, and two Cornish hens to smoke today.

My wife Diane points out that it is possible to smoke using gas. Turn the shields that cover the burners upside down and fill them with wood chips. I add this in case you are stuck using someone else's inferior equipment.
Go to
Dec 31, 2017 09:03:50   #
lindajoy wrote:
What Congress wil not do can be achieved by a people’s Article V referendum when they succeed in the called for need of two-thirds (currently 34) of the state legislatures to move or actually forcing the v**e..Problem is the people talk the talk but lack commitment in getting what they want.. Congressman do what is in their interest not the citizens simple.. example ~< term limitations for instance...

Be free to do the things you want...~~

I’m sailing out of Honolulu to MAUI, enjoying a glass of red wine, North and South~~
This came on, enjoy~~

https://youtu.be/7XcTyEKSnYg
What Congress wil not do can be achieved by a peop... (show quote)
Boy Linda, that was a wonderful feeling way to start the day. I visualize you sailing smoothly through warm crystal blue water and listening to smooth music. I hope Maui is equally luscious.
I share your enthusiasm about the Convention of States, with reservations. 1 They have three broad but limiting objectives. 2 They will be staffed by appointees from the states. 3 Will they have a clue what to do? I'm doing all I can to be there, but who knows. My friends in Government are under assault from the Dems. I think that the violation of the Constitution that I described above should be corrected before the COS. That correction makes all three COS issues irrelevant.
Go to
Dec 30, 2017 21:41:55   #
What I really want is to get one of the Congressmen, because they have Standing Before the Court, to take this case to the Supreme Court. They have Original Jurisdiction upon any issue dealing with ministers of the Government. This issue deals with all of the ministers of the Government. Drain the Swamp. Please read this argument. This is important to the survival of the country. Try to understand it. Bring your extensive knowledge of the system as it exists, and try to not be blinded to the existence of the forest because of all the trees in the way. Thanks, Rickmondale@aol.com
Blade_Runner wrote:
OK, how is it unconstitutional for an incoming president to have a plan in hand. If that were true then every president ever elected violated the constitution. You might take a close look at the plan Obama had in hand well before he was even nominated (his concept for "fundamentally t***sforming America" was in his mind long before he was elected). And, you might take note of how he managed to disqualify all of his opponents in his rise to power.

And, you need to brush up on the principle of Separation of Powers (Articles 1, 2, and 3). With this system of Checks and Balances, the president DOES NOT take orders from congress, nor does he order congress to do anything. It doesn't work that way.

BTW: The House of Representatives DOES NOT guide the nation or set taxes. All funding bills must originate in the House, but they must pass in both houses, and must be signed by the president before becoming law. Under certain and rare circumstances, a bill that has passed in both houses can become law without the president's signature.
OK, how is it unconstitutional for an incoming pre... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 30, 2017 21:36:55   #
Larry the Legend wrote:
I think we just covered that, but just out of morbid curiosity, change it 'back' to what?
What I really want is to get one of the Congressmen, because they have Standing Before the Court, to take this case to the Supreme Court. They have Original Jurisdiction upon any issue dealing with ministers of the Government. This issue deals with all of the ministers of the Government. Drain the Swamp. Larry please read this argument. This is important to the survival of the country. Try to understand it.
Go to
Dec 30, 2017 21:31:47   #
Super Dave wrote:
The v**ers fix it or it doesn't get fixed.
When the wife's pipe got cracked I used Super glue. It is still holding water. What I really want is to get one of the Congressmen, because they have Standing Before the Court, to take this case to the Supreme Court. They have Original Jurisdiction upon any issue dealing with ministers of the Government. This issue deals with all of the ministers of the Government. Drain the Swamp.
Go to
Dec 30, 2017 09:54:11   #
eagleye13 wrote:
"Politically incorrect, but funny all the same."
I agree.
I read years ago that;
Polish jokes originated by "jews"; as the Polish were wise enough to expel the parasitical "Jews" from their country. Hence the derogatory "polish jokes"
Were they dumb for that?
Actually the Poles were very protective of the Jews in Poland. A number of Poles were put to death for protecting Jews during WWII.
Go to
Dec 28, 2017 21:23:39   #
Super Dave wrote:
Step away from the crack pipe.
My pipe is not cracked. The Government is though, and if we don't fix it then who?, and if not now then when?
Go to
Dec 28, 2017 19:25:51   #
Super Dave wrote:
Your system guarantees nothing.

And your babbling about non humans shows you're either insane, on drugs, or mentally challenged.
Do you own a factory? Do you want it protected? Is it human?
Go to
Dec 28, 2017 19:00:39   #
Super Dave wrote:
Your system guarantees nothing.

And your babbling about non humans shows you're either insane, on drugs, or mentally challenged.
All true
Go to
Dec 28, 2017 08:44:48   #
Super Dave wrote:
And your system of v****g is no different.

Perhaps you should start another thread on something you've thought out a bit better.

When we v**e, up to one half of the e*****rate is disenfranchised. To be disenfranchised is not a form of representation. If you are disenfranchised you have no seat at the table. If you have no seat at the table then your interests will not be considered. If your interests are not represented then they will likely be violated. This trespass can often be infuriating and damaging. Avoidance of such an outcome is mandatory. Thus we have the warfare between the two parties. My system guaranties a seat at the table for all citizens, even the minorities, even the nonhuman, and even those with no physical form.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 19 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.