[/quote]

The Constitution is interpreted in the ORIGINAL context. Ginsburg and the other unconstitutionalist Liberal judges violate that. They reinterpret it to their will. Thats how they are destroying this country.

She is already retired. Mentally, Physically, and morally. She should have been removed from office for violating the Logan Act. Her speaking out against Trump was a removal offense. NO government official is supposed to lend support to a political candidate that shows a "partial" bias.

There are so many contrived outrages in a given week, let alone a year, that it can be hard to recall any individual instance of outrage after it has already passed. But the infamous Starbucks bathroom outrage was so phony, so absurd, and so disconnected from anything resembling logic or reason, that it deserves to be remembered.

In case you need a refresher course: a Starbucks manager at a location in Philadelphia came under heavy fire last spring after refusing restroom privileges to two non-customers. The men, who happened to be black, asked to use the restroom but were informed that only paying customers were granted access to the facilities. This was not a policy she invented on her own. At the time, many Starbucks locations enforced this rule, just as many other restaurants and stores enforce similar rules.

The men sat down and took up a table while refusing to purchase something. They were informed, again, that they would have to buy a coffee, or a snack, or anything else, if they wanted to sit at a table or use the bathroom. They continued to refuse. Finally, the manager called the police and reported them for trespassing. The incident went v***l. "R****m" was immediately assumed, despite a total lack of evidence to support the charge. The Starbucks CEO publicly threw the loyal employee under the bus. Finally, in their last act of corporate cowardice, Starbucks reversed their restroom policy and announced that anyone, even non-customers, could sit in their restaurants and use their bathrooms.

Fast forward a few months. Certain Starbucks locations, less than a year after announcing this enlightened new restroom philosophy, now must install special disposal boxes for used heroin needles. They'll also be removing regular trashcans from some bathrooms after employees expressed concern about getting pricked with needles while changing out the bags. There have been reports of condoms, alcohol bottles, and blood stains on the floors. Indeed, this bathroom free-for-all has made bathrooms ironically less accessible as some Starbucks restaurants have had to close their stalls for extended periods due to, says the New York Post, "prolonged cleaning."

It may be fairly pointed out that Starbucks probably had many of these problems even before the new policy. Yes, and that's exactly the point. That's why the policy existed in the first place. A spacious, private, single-stall bathroom at a Starbucks in an urban area is an attractive place for drug addicts, drunks, vagrants, and other assorted characters. Most businesses are not interested in becoming de facto homeless shelters or halfway homes. Historically, that's why they reserve their bathrooms and their tables for people who are actually interested in purchasing their products. It's not a fail-proof plan, but it's relatively effective. There's a reason why these needle disposal boxes only became necessary after they changed the policy.

So, what have we learned here? It's likely that the suits at Starbucks have learned exactly zilch. The rest of us, though, have again discovered that caving to the unthinking, outraged masses will profit you nothing in the end. If you abandon a thoughtful, well-reasoned path just because a bunch of imbeciles are shouting some word that ends with -ist or -phobic, you will ultimately pay a much higher price than wh**ever price the imbeciles may have been able to extract. You'll wind up shamed and embarrassed, with blood stains on your floor and heroin needles in your trashcan. But at least no one will call you a r****t.

The lies are spewed by the N**icrats, and you two just eat it up.

Trump was legitimately elected, IN SPITE of all the i******s v****g for Hitler. And the Russian collusion was between Hitler and Putin. And he met the qualification to be President.

Now Obastard is a different story. He was a Gay, Marxist, Kenyan citizen, installed by the deep state, to destroy America. And he damned near did. IT was the ILLEGITIMATE Imposter President.

Arrest the i******s and throw them back over the border. ANY employer of these i******s should be fined 10 times what they paid them in salaries since being hired and then arrested for violating i*********n l*ws, the politicians (Mexifornia ones being biggest perps) who grant sanctuary to them arrested and jailed. And most importantly, the politicians charged with conspiracy to commit murder, for each illegal that commits murder against our people.

Freak show. Looks between your legs if you dont know what you are.

Not necessarily, but it is our RIGHT to have them if we want them.

Honorary degrees. Given to her JUST for being the President Imposters husband.

Yeah, I wouldnt do the "ape" remark. BUT!! Melania is a hell of a lot more beautiful than the previous FLOTUS (who is a man).

During one week in January 1973, President Richard M. Nixon was inaugurated to his second term, former President Lyndon Baines Johnson died, the United States and North Vietnam entered into the Paris peace accords, and the Supreme Court legalized a******n. Only the last of these events continues to affect and haunt the moral and constitutional order every minute of every day.

The court’s decision in Roe v. Wade is arguably its most controversial in the post-World War II era. Its effect has been as pernicious to human life as was its 19th-century intellectual progenitor, Dred Scott v. Sanford, in which the Supreme Court ruled that African-Americans are not persons.

Roe declares that the states may not ban a******ns during the first trimester of a woman’s pregnancy because the states have no interest in or right to protect the baby during that time period. This made-up rule was a radical and unconstitutional departure from nearly 200 years of jurisprudence, during which the states themselves decided what interests to protect, guided since the end of the Civil War by the prohibition on s***ery, and the requirements of due process and equal protection.

During the second trimester of pregnancy, the court declared in the Roe case, states may regulate a******ns but only to protect the health of the mother, not the life of the baby, in which, the court found inexplicably, the states have no interest. This, too, was a radical departure from well-settled law.

Under Roe, during the third trimester of pregnancy, the states may ban a******ns or they may permit them; they may protect the life of the baby or they may not protect it. This diabolic rule, the product of judicial compromise and an embarrassing and destructive rejection of the Civil War era constitutional amendments, permits the states to allow a******ns up to the moment before birth, as is the law in New Jersey, where the state even pays for a******ns for those who cannot afford them.

The linchpin of Roe v. Wade is the judicial determination that the baby in the womb is not a person. The court felt it was legally necessary to make this dreadful declaration because the Constitution guarantees due process (a fair jury trial, and its attendant constitutional protections) whenever the government wants to interfere with the life, liberty or property of any person; and it prohibits the states from permitting some persons to violate the basic human rights of others, as was the case under s***ery. As the Supreme Court sometimes does, it ruled on an issue and came to a conclusion that none of the litigants before it had sought.

Roe candidly recognizes that if the fetus in the womb is a person, then all laws permitting a******n are unconstitutional. The court understood that a******n and fetal personhood would constitute the states permitting private persons – doctors – to murder other persons – babies in the womb. So, in order to accommodate the k*****g, it simply redefined the meaning of “person,” lest it permit a state of affairs that due process and the prohibition of s***ery could never tolerate. The British writer George Orwell predicted this horrific and totalitarian use of words in his 1949 unnerving description of tyranny, entitled 1984.

Is the fetus in the womb a person? Well, no court has contradicted the Supreme Court on this, and the Roe supporters argue that non-personhood is necessary for sexual freedom. Think about that: the pro-a******n rights crowd, rejecting the natural and probable consequences of ordinary, healthy sexual intercourse, wants to be able to k**l babies in the name of sexual freedom.

Now I take a back seat to no one when it comes to personal freedom, but the freedom to k**l innocents violates all norms of civilized society. It violates the natural law. It wasn’t even condoned in the state of nature, before governments existed. It violates the 13th and 14th Amendments. Yet, the Supreme Court and numerous congresses have refused to interfere with it. It is a grave and profound evil. It is legalized murder.

Is the fetus in the womb a person? Since the fetus has human parents and all the needed human genome to develop into postnatal life, of course the fetus is a person.

I’ve argued many times that a simple one-line statute could have been enacted when Ronald Reagan or George W. Bush or George H.W. Bush were in the White House and Republicans and pro-life Democrats, the few that there are, controlled the Congress. They could have ended the slaughter by legislatively defining the fetus in the womb to be a person. They did not. Are the self-proclaimed pro-life folks in Congress sincere, or do they march under the pro-life banner just to win v**es?

Their failure to attempt to define the fetus in the womb as a person seriously, and the Supreme Court’s unprecedented dance around the requirement of due process and the prohibition of s***ery has resulted in 44 million a******ns in 43 years. That’s an a******n a minute. A******n is today one of the most frequent medical procedures performed in America; and the Democrats have become its champion.

They, and their few Republican allies, have become the champions of totalitarianism as well. The removal of legal personhood from human offspring in order to destroy the offspring is only the work of tyrants. How long can a society last that violates universal norms and k**ls the babies in the name of “sexual freedom”?

Whose personhood will the government define away next?

Nice try!! ALL America h**ers support the background checks that the N**icrats want. AMERICANS believe in the US Constitution.

And I did a MAJOR Hitlery, wiped, and flushed it down this morning.

Which has to FIRST HAPPEN, before he can be accountable for it. You have to DO something, to be accountable for it. So lets get Hitlery for her Russian collusion, since that is where it is at.

Aww!! Upset that this WOMAN is more beautiful than the previous First Husband of the US?