Bcon wrote:
Most of the start of your letter is factual. Why didn’t you use the same reasoning
when Obama was president and note the blatant crimes that he committed while in office? Is it because you are really hypocritical?
What about when he was candidate for POTUS in 2008 and his world trip meeting with many European and Middle East leaders? The media followed him around and fawned all over him like the lapdogs they are. It was clearly a violation of the Logan Act.
"In July 2008, independent of any policy conversations by staff, candidate Obama went to the Middle East and Europe and spoke extensively, one-on-one, about policy with leaders from Kuwait, Afghanistan, Iraq, Jordan, the West Bank, Israel, France, Germany and Britain. As a candidate, not as a president-elect.
Without thought of violating the Logan Act, Mr. Obama conducted substantive conversations with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, Jordan’s King Abdullah, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Israel’s Prime Minister Elud Olmert, Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel, France’s President Nicolas Sarkozy, Britain’s Prime Minister Gordon Brown, his predecessor Tony Blair and opposition leader David Cameron. In short, in an effort to t***sparently promote his p**********l candidacy, with all manner of topics, candidate Obama flew straight into the Logan Act."
Mr. Charles informs that in 200 years no one has been charged with violating the Logan Act. In 2008 these same news outlets were following Obama around like puppies and praising his every word and deed. The man was even awarded the Nobel Prize for peace without having done anything more than travel the world talking to leaders in private conversations…most of it while GWB was still president.
Clearly a hypocritical double standard in the treatment of his oliness and trumpy