One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Common_Sense_Matters
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 172 next>>
Jul 7, 2019 15:22:25   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
OK, I read that r****t, bigoted, xenophobic, secular, anti-religion diatribe by a Limey writer of fiction novels and I'm asking myself, how in bloody hell does this hack job "pretty much sum up" anything? It is the same cry of the Borg collective that we have seen manifest for two and a half years. It bears the same diabolical characteristics of h**e speech and inhuman artificiality that rings from the keyboards and spews from the forked tongues of every spiritually barren progressive on the planet. The only thing that differentiates it from all the others is how the words are strung together.

However, if this bottom feeding creature called "factnotfiction" had a functioning brain, independent of the dark force of the progressive queen, it would be satisfied with its summation and stop screaming.
OK, I read that r****t, bigoted, xenophobic, secul... (show quote)


The only r****m, bigotry, xenophobia, secularity or anti-religion in that piece posted in the OP is that which you carried into it through your own warped interpretation of that piece. There exists none of those in that piece. The closest it comes is, if you choose to create your own interpretation of what is written, that the author has issues with Evangelicals, which one could conceivably come away from that piece with that feeling. One can also come away with the feeling that Evangelicals have chosen to ignore Trump's many shortcomings in favor of pushing their religious agenda. For the religious right, pushing a religious agenda would be a positive aspect.

Many of the characteristics that Trump openly displays in just about everything he does and says are antithetical to the ethics that Evangelicals claim to adhere to. That said, their choice to back and support him is in fact hypocritical.
Go to
Jul 7, 2019 13:29:48   #
MR Mister wrote:
She's my cousin and does not want her name out as you lefties are all crazy.


Well then you have one hell of an indecisive cousin and she should really make up her mind already.



Interesting what you find on the internet isn't it? For those that believe anything mr. mr. says... Since he tells you this woman is his cousin, we can tell one thing for sure now, he is a liar.

Go to
Jul 7, 2019 05:43:08   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
So, now you have inflated this beyond reason and are accusing president Trump of deliberately lying when he said, "they took the airports"? Is that what you are saying?

Geez, ya know, I've been thinking about that. During an hour long message saluting America and honoring Americans, why would he insert a quick lie at that specific moment? For what purpose? What was to be gained? I am hard pressed to come up with a wild answer, much less a reasonable one.

Well, let's see. Throughout his life as a businessman and now as president, Donald Trump has traveled all over the United States and all over the world. He doesn't travel to all of these places by car or bus or train. Nope, he flies. He flew often and everywhere in his own jet and he flies often on Marine One and Air Force One. And, where does he go to board an aircraft and where does he deplane after the aircraft lands? Last I heard, airplanes usually take off and land at AIRPORTS. I imagine then that AIRPORTS are a rather important, even vital, aspect of his travels. I reckon he is quite familiar with AIRPORTS.

Moreover, during the last half of his message, he talked about America's AVIATION pioneers--Orville and Wilbur, Rickenbacker, Doolittle, Earhart, Yeager, and about our Astronauts--Glenn, Armstrong.

And he praised the five branches of our armed forces. As he concluded his remarks about each one, he announced that we would witness a FLY OVER by AIRCRAFT operated by each branch of service. Anywhere from three to five AIRCRAFT of all types FLEW over the mall. First to FLY OVER were the Coast Guard AIRCRAFT, then came those of the AIR FORCE, then the Navy, Marines, and finally the US Army (who "took over the airports")

Yep, by the time the US Army AIRCRAFT flew over the mall, he probably had some sort of AVIATION thing going on in his mind. As he watched the FLY OVERS, he surely must have had AIRPORTS, AIRPLANES, AVIATION, AVIATORS, and FLYING in mind when he committed the grievous error of mentioning the Continental Army and airports in the same sentence.
So, now you have inflated this beyond reason and a... (show quote)


He is constantly telling lies deliberately, some for gain, some due to stupidity (like the Revolution era airports) and some that nobody knows why, Trump's claim that his father, Fred Trump, was born in Germany. Anything that isn't true is a lie. Do I think that he knew it was a lie when he told it, sadly, yes, but in his defense, I am sure he didn't see the harm in making up stupid stories because as far as he knew, it could have been true. To say he isn't the sharpest tool in the shed is a massive understatement. To say he is the dullest tool in the shed, that in many cases is very likely true.
Go to
Jul 7, 2019 05:27:33   #
PeterS wrote:
Didn't America use to be a world leader? Now under Trump, I wonder if being a world leader in f*****m counts>

https://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-germany-coal-power-20190126-story.html?fbclid=IwAR2rZWrjg-EalAPZFUimXjuMIbUJoeGrzEOJKi9L_FX0KjhukXfDVkI58NA

And didn't Always Trumper say that we are now respected again? Respected by whom? Does anyone have any guesses?


Nobody, all our allies realize that we can't be counted on and all the ruthless dictators are laughing at us.
Go to
Jul 7, 2019 02:58:50   #
JW wrote:
Actually, the first manned flight took place on November 21, 1783. I guess it all depends on what you call an airport.


Hot air balloons require no airport as I mentioned before, either on this thread or another. Besides, when one thinks "airport" they typically think of planes, hot air balloons aren't even typically allowed near airports and helicopters have their own designated areas in and around airports. Helicopters also don't require an airport as they don't require a runway since they, like hot air balloons take off vertically not horizontally.
Go to
Jul 7, 2019 01:20:56   #
proud republican wrote:
BS excuse!!!!


Blade_Runner wrote:
That's all the l*****t fools have, PR, is excuses. If they can't snatch one off the top of their heads, they'll go to work manufacturing one.


Yes, of course. If Trump tells an obvious lie, he simply misspoke, if Obama makes an easily explainable numeric faux pas, he actually believes something that NOBODY believes. Some mistakenly believe that there are 52 states, I even ran across some that have said that we have 48 and others still that believe the number stands at 49, NOBODY has EVER stated that we have 57 states, yet according to you two, Obama actually believes that we have 57 states, even though NOBODY else does. Partisan much?

As for Trumps revolution era airports... 1776 is 127 years BEFORE the first successful flight. Could the great depression have been caused by a computer hacker exploiting a Microsoft Windows vulnerability? Why didn't our Korean war and Vietnam veterans have the common courtesy to call home more frequently on their iPhones to keep their families from worrying? That or at least send an E-mail or Skype with their loved ones once in a while to assure them that they were safe. No less foolish than Trump's revolution era airports.
Go to
Jul 7, 2019 00:37:20   #
proud republican wrote:
So obama misspoke and President Trump doesnt know facts????...Riiiight!!!!
So obama misspoke and President Trump doesnt know ... (show quote)


it was obvious if you listened to the flub. He halted realizing that he hadn't yet visited all the states nor would he be visiting ALL 50, but rather only the 48 contiguous states and that he still had one left to go. when he went to pick it back up, instead of acknowledging the flub and starting to state the number from scratch, he tried to fix it by stating the "7" that would have went well had he started by saying forty, instead of fifty. A simple mistake to make in a speech. To make up historical events that not only never happened, they COULDN'T happen, not an easy mistake to make, especially when talking about 18th century events with 20th century additions. I would have been far more charitable of he were talking about a late 19th century event with early 20th century additions.
Go to
Jul 7, 2019 00:26:33   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
If you ever succeed in proving your points, please let us know when that happens. All this psuedo-intellectual, self-righteous bulls**t doesn't cut it.

Once again, the 8 criminal referrals resulting from a 2 - 1/2 year investigation by the House Intelligence Committee are not something I "pulled out of my ass." I have yet to find a lib prog who isn't afraid to face the t***h.


Yes, it would seem that I am "tilting" at a particularly ignorant "windmill" aren't I? I will not likely get my point across to any Trumpsters but at least those more intellectually capable than the typical Trumpster may come across my posts and perhaps find enlightenment that they had not considered before.
Go to
Jul 7, 2019 00:22:29   #
Trooper745 wrote:
My pet peeve is willful hypocrisy. L*****ts are the most hypocritical in that they tolerate the exact same ignorance and dishonesty in their politicians that they find objectionable in POTUS Trump. T***h be known, they don't really object to ignorance and dishonesty in politicians, they just object to any and everything in any politician that isn't a democrat, ... simply politics and BS.


Actually... I have seen the "lefties" calling out their own over lies and I have seen them calling their own out on ignorant statements as well. Your claim of hypocrisy in this instance is without merit, showing your dishonesty again?
Go to
Jul 7, 2019 00:17:21   #
archie bunker wrote:
And Trump supporters have beatings coming too, huh?


Ah, the old "exaggerate and conflate" tactic, isn't that one usually reserved for times of desperation?
Go to
Jul 7, 2019 00:14:01   #
cjprentiss wrote:
The video shows that Obama actually did say "57 states". Well, it's good to see that it's substantiated. I guess that Trump talking about airports during the American Revolution of 1776 does not stand alone. Trump has some company.


Flubbing a correction when one has misspoken is a far cry from not knowing the facts about what you are speaking on entirely.
Go to
Jul 7, 2019 00:04:15   #
jeezmcrow wrote:
You sir have a voice I appreciate. Thank you for simply talking instead of insulting. That is true discourse.

As for "conspiracy theories " I really don't know which one is being pumped into this thread.

I'm well aware of the definition of both conspiracy and theory.

I believe that America is A great nation.
I also believe that there is a rogue group of humans in high places that really call the shots on this planet. I don't try to push my ideas, but I want to talk to others who want to talk, not insult.

And for that sir, thank you.
I hope you are in good health, and read that damn book! It wants to be read.
Be well!
You sir have a voice I appreciate. Thank you for ... (show quote)


Ricktloml wrote:
Yes there were 5 states where a******n was legal pre-1973. That doesn't change the fact that Roe V Wade was bad law, even the left admits it, (it's why they fear a challenge so badly.) And NO legal decision will make a******n any less savage, barbaric and uncivilized. But you on the left do crave that power of life and death, especially when the target of your death sentence can in no way fight back. And no I do not agree with the Democrat/socialists. It wasn't President Trump that first weaponized the IRS to rig the 2012 e******ns, then because Obama got away with it, he fully expected to c***t Hillary into office by weaponizing the intelligence and law enforcement agencies, in the worst s*******s, corruption and abuse of power scandal in U.S. history. Granted there are many RINOs in Congress who are if not just as corrupt as the Democrat/socialists, they're certainly close. President Trump has not ignored the rule of law, your claim that he has is simply your opinion, which as an American you are entitled to, unless the Democrat/socialists regain power in which case our liberties will be under the usual assault that leftism/socialism/Marxism/c*******m has historically forced on populations they control. As for any loss of credibility because I reject the false narratives of the left and have the nerve to say so, I don't let that bother me in the least. It is the Democrat/socialists and RINOs who were willing to secure the border during Obama's presidency, (at least they claimed they were going to,) but really they were lying as usual. After all Pelosi, Schummer and the RINOs could hardly say they wanted 25 billion dollars to secure the border WITH some of that money going to erect barriers under Obama and actually do it, they all understood that it was business as usual, lying so the American public would think the rule of law meant something to them. Then for months as 5,000 i******s A DAY streamed across the border, with the help of criminal cartels, (I guess the Democrat/socialists and RINOs are in fact in league with these cartels, talk about ignore the rule of law when you partner with criminal cartels,) they could close the asylum loopholes, and appropriate money to help our overwhelmed Border Patrol, but of course they don't, (for months they outright lied and said there was NO crisis at the border,) talk about a loss of credibility. It is a shame that Democrat/socialists leadership and their accomplices and collaborators in the media have stoked this deranged hatred of President Trump to the point that they themselves are so poisoned they are rabid in their hatred.
Yes there were 5 states where a******n was legal p... (show quote)


Louie27 wrote:
Your last paragraph isn't quite factual. The Obama had more egregious acts against the opposite party that any other time in our history. But the evidence was keep hidden by the Obama administration to keep their party safe. It will probably be decades before the public will ever see the full extent of their corruption.


Ricktloml wrote:
Good morning to you. A******n was part of the originally post, so that makes discussing the butchering of the unborn perfectly acceptable, no need to start another thread. And I assume your snide remarks about minority rule are over the illegal v**e in Mexifornia that labeled Hillary carrying the majority. Perhaps when the t***h is exposed about the extent Obama went to , to c***t Hillary into office you l*****ts might, (I doubt it,) accept the results of the last e******n. If not I'm sure you will continue your s*******s efforts at corruption and abuse of power to try to regain the power and control you crave. After all you Democrat/socialists have given up trying to hide your socialist agenda. Viva Venezuela for America should be your motto.
Good morning to you. A******n was part of the orig... (show quote)


Larry the Legend wrote:
You call them 'conspiracy theories'. The rest of us call them 'evidence'. Evidence that's going to unmask the greatest swindle this world has ever seen. With the attempted c**p of a duly elected President at its apex.


My eyes were bugging out due to some people and their "great wall of text" posts or I might have picked out more. Notice I even highlighted one line of your post that I am replying on. Pretty sure you are talking the "Globalism" conspiracy theory or are you talking about the "Deep State" conspiracy theory, either way, only a theory until/unless it gets proven otherwise.
Go to
Jul 6, 2019 23:30:05   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
It doesn't take a brain surgeon to use a search engine. If you were an objective and honest American rather than a highly prejudiced and hostile progressive putz, you could easily look this up.

What's the point then in providing you with a link. It is quite obvious how you would react.


It is the poster's responsibility to prove their point, not the reader's responsibility to do YOUR homework. if you want to promote your own opinions and expect others to consider them, it is YOUR responsibility to back your opinions with actual facts and the proof that they are real facts not just something you pull from your ass.
Go to
Jul 6, 2019 23:22:59   #
Seth wrote:
If it walks like a duck...

This is why it would be a waste of time to dredge up evidence that he is a socialist -- on an "in for a penny, in for a pound" basis, he proclaims it every time he posts, as do Permafrost, Sew What, Morgan the Pirate-ette and to some extent, the infamous John Correspondent and Rumitoid, who actually has a little more character than his colleagues.

The rest of that lot, Kevyn, LoneWolf, etc are just confused momma's basement dwellers who haven't a clue what they're talking about, but crave attention. We don't hear as much from them just now because it's right after the first of the month. 😁
If it walks like a duck... br br This is why it w... (show quote)


Yes, because I see Trump for the piece of s**t that he is, I MUST be a socialist. What a dumbass statement. It is what we have come to expect from you and of course you NEVER back it up with any facts. That sums you up well, someone that makes asinine accusations not based on any facts, yet you think you are making good points. Perhaps if you ever had a point... Nah, even if you thought you had a point, it wouldn't be a point worth noting.
Go to
Jul 6, 2019 23:16:52   #
permafrost wrote:
The question is not about the name of the party followed, but of the character of the people of the party at any point in time..

time.. then, time now..

You find the same type of people were democrat up to the 60s or so, as now call themselves republican..

the r****t h**ers and un American types.. they always love s***ery and rights only for themselves and those just like them..

h**e then, h**e now==same people..


I have made that same point numerous times, they are good at ignoring and denying.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 172 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.