One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Highlander66
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 30 next>>
Aug 19, 2018 06:56:30   #
maximus wrote:
A****a represents suppression of rights. The right to free speech and to assemble are two rights that they suppress violently. A****a supports conformity to one ideology. If your opinion doesn't agree with theirs, then you are a N**i, a f*****t. A****a supports the removal of the current system of government. A****a supports violence to attain their goals. A****a supports attaining their goals by any means necessary. A****a hides their identity with masks and black clothing( odd that the SS wore black and came in the night so no one would know who they were or what they were doing). A****a is r****t as most of them are white. B****s and Hispanics are way underrepresented.

NONE of your descriptions of conservatives fit the definition of f*****m.
Nationalists...Yep, you bet.
uber patriot...yep, you bet
militarists...yep, weak military=no country
authoritarian...nope, we support the constitution all the way
anti immigration...nope, we just want it legal
liberal democracy...we reject i***tic liberalism for all the reasons I listed above
scapegoats...does the word 'illegal' have any meaning to you, or a religion where people's heads are cut off for being Christian?
Sexism...have you ever had sex? Then you are guilty of sexism. Have you ever lusted after a good looking woman? Then you are guilty of sexism. Have you got a penis? Then you are guilty of sexism.
National security...absolutely, actually stupidity to list it. Without it we would be under N**i control today
religion and state together...nope. While every religion on earth is OK, it is your swag that outlaws Christianity, so HOW can they be intertwined? I suppose suppression of a person's right to their religion is not f*****m.
corporate protection...if you mean protecting American business from Chinese thieves or unfair trade agreements, then yes by all means
unions and organized labor...firstly, they are the same thing. To name them both is redundant. Second, it's organized, not originated. I don't see Trump suppressing labor unions. Haven't heard a word about it.

So, no, a****a does not represent any of the traits that you listed, (at least not the t***h of them). What they DO represent is TRUE f*****m.
The definition of hypocrisy is one who practices what they stand against, which is a****a in a nutshell. A f*****t is a f*****t no matter what they preach. You say I don't know what I am talking about? That I'm an i***t?
I***t was formerly a legal and psychiatric category of profound intellectual disability, where a person's mental age is two years or less, and he or she cannot guard himself or herself against common physical dangers. Along with terms like moron, imbecile, and cretin, the term is now archaic and offensive,[1] and was replaced by the term profound mental r****dation (which has itself since been replaced by other terms).

Nowadays, "i***t" is a derogatory term for a stupid or foolish person. Of which I am neither. I say you are guilty of denialism. Wikipedia says denialism is;
Anthropologist Didier Fassin distinguishes between denial, defined as "the empirical observation that reality and t***h are being denied", and denialism, which he defines as "an ideological position whereby one systematically reacts by refusing reality and t***h"
Fits you to a tee, there, Pete.
A****a represents suppression of rights. The right... (show quote)

Holy cow! You brought the heat on this one. Absolutely brilliant response and one hundred percent correct. It’s a shame that it’ll pass right over their heads. A****a is a d******c t*******t group that uses traditional f*****t methods. I personally believe that what they are attempting to do is goad a violent response so that the people behind them can point at it and try to justify the idea of calling everyone right of Maxine a n**i. Kind of like whacking a bear with a stick and telling everyone you are hitting the bear because it’s a mean old bear and deserves to be hit even though the bear is minding its own business, then when the bear gets tired of getting hit it turns and mauls the moron with the stick. Then they point and say “see, the bear mauled us. It’s mean and needs to be done away with!”
Go to
Aug 17, 2018 15:46:14   #
woodguru wrote:
They need to be held to the same standard. Either the standard is that it's okay to exercise religious beliefs, or the city needs to issue a warning then revoke their business license. If Christians can't do it neither can Muslims.

Another way to look at it is that this might be acceptable in some conservative communities where it isn't in other more liberal ones, let the communities decide what flies? There are issues where policies would be best served if the attitudes of the locals are respected.

Another thing that as far as I'm concerned makes sense, make it a law that it's okay for a business to hold religious beliefs like this, but they need to post a standard sign declaring that so that patrons who don't support bigotry can refuse to patronize that shop. About the time a shop owner loses a solid piece of business they might come around to a different and more tolerant way of thinking.

I have a contractor friend who h**ed gays, 20 years ago he couldn't tolerate working for them on remodel jobs and would refuse them. Now he says he would starve if it weren't for them (San Francisco Bay Area). He now says he loves working for them, they pay wh**ever he wants and appreciate reliable good quality work, and are willing to gladly pay well for it. He says every time he does a remodel he gets several referrals to their friends.
They need to be held to the same standard. Either ... (show quote)


A fair reply. I can’t disagree with this. Thank you for your thoughts
Go to
Aug 17, 2018 15:42:16   #
These look great! I’m using this one.
Go to
Aug 17, 2018 15:36:23   #
Welcome to the house! Glad to have you aboard.
Go to
Aug 17, 2018 15:30:24   #
Kevyn wrote:
What utter nonsense, first of all conspiring with a foreign adversary against the United States is a serious felony. Secondly Trumps v***r f***d investigation uncovered no evidence of fraud and was quietly ended to save the i***t Pumpkinfuhrer embarrassment in being caught in another blatant lie. The only way Americans learned it found nothing is that it’s records were obtained by FOIA. If through his investigation Mueller discovers other crimes committed by Trump, his family or associates he has an obligation to turn the evidence over to federal and state prosecutors. Regardless of what his supporters feel no felon like Trump should be allowed to serve as president and or avoid justice.
What utter nonsense, first of all conspiring with ... (show quote)


Sorry Kev, your reply to a factual and well thought out post needs to be better than “nuh-uh!”
Go to
Aug 17, 2018 12:28:10   #
Lonewolf wrote:
no, we need to shut this country down no electricity no water no police no phone internet no hospitals no planes trains nothing just pissed off Americans taking their Country back!!!


I must say, Wolf I don’t find a lot that I agree with in many of your posts normally but I can get behind you on this. I’m afraid the wheels are going to come off and the wake up call is going to be severe. Good post
Go to
Aug 17, 2018 12:23:34   #
I watched an episode of louder with crowder where he went to a bunch of Muslim owned and operated bakeries and asked for a gay wedding cake and was refused 100% of the time. Why doesn’t this get any attention. All of the bakers referred him to someone who could provide his cake, just as the Christian bakers did but it seems Muslims can do or not do pretty much as they please.
Go to
Aug 15, 2018 14:25:59   #
Airforceone wrote:
Are you some kind of a fool he had a year long affair with a beauty queen then an ongoing affair with the porno star. That women does not even sleep in the same room with fat d********g piece of garbage. Love of his life what a damm fool


You post statements with interesting content for someone that likes to call other people ‘h**ers’. I won’t go into why a lot of what you’ve said is wrong because it wouldn’t do any good. You remind me of the people who are screaming horrible and h**eful epithets at other people while holding a sign that says ‘love trumps h**e’ without a clue of the irony or hypocrisy of their own actions. I look forward to when the ‘tolerant’ left finally self destructs into tiny factions of angry people who h**e everyone who doesn’t agree with their narrow worldview. I think it’s closer than you think. I will pray for you.
Go to
Aug 14, 2018 13:07:07   #
I have always felt that Twisted Sisters “wake up the sleeping giant” should be the anthem of the US Armed forces. If you haven’t heard it make sure you listen to it loud and proud.
Go to
Aug 14, 2018 12:57:49   #
Super Dave wrote:
CHE FAILS AGAIN! Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's candidate goes down in flames in HI-01 primary
https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2018/08/12/che-fails-again-alexandria-ocasio-cortezs-candidate-goes-down-in-flames-in-hi-01-primary/


That’s hilarious! I’ll have to pass that one along. Cortez is the best thing to happen in a long time and I wishe a long and vocal campaign
Go to
Aug 14, 2018 12:55:48   #
eden wrote:
This just posted by Politico. A long read but worth it....

Stephen Miller is an Immigration Hypocrite. I Know Because I’m His Uncle.
If my nephew’s ideas on immigration had been in force a century ago, our family would have been wiped out.
Let me tell you a story about Stephen Miller and chain migration.
It begins at the turn of the 20th century in a dirt-floor shack in the village of Antopol, a shtetl of subsistence farmers in what is now Belarus. Beset by violent anti-Jewish pogroms and forced childhood conscription in the Czar’s army, the patriarch of the shack, Wolf-Leib Glosser, fled a village where his forebears had lived for centuries and took his chances in America.
He set foot on Ellis Island on January 7, 1903, with $8 to his name. Though fluent in Polish, Russian, and Yiddish he understood no English. An elder son, Nathan, soon followed. By street corner peddling and sweat-shop toil Wolf-Leib and Nathan sent enough money home to pay off debts and buy the immediate family’s passage to America in 1906. That group included young Sam Glosser, who with his family settled in the western Pennsylvania city of Johnstown, a booming coal and steel town that was a magnet for other hard-working immigrants. The Glosser family quickly progressed from selling goods from a horse and wagon to owning a haberdashery in Johnstown run by Nathan and Wolf-Leib to a chain of supermarkets and discount department stores run by my grandfather, Sam, and the next generation of Glossers, including my dad, Izzy. It was big enough to be listed on the AMEX stock exchange and employed thousands of people over time. In the span of some 80 years and five decades, this family emerged from poverty in a hostile country to become a prosperous, educated clan of merchants, scholars, professionals, and, most important, American citizens.
What does this classically American tale have to do with Stephen Miller? Well, Izzy Glosser, is his maternal grandfather, and Stephen’s mother, Miriam, is my sister.
I have watched with dismay and increasing horror as my nephew, who is an educated man and well aware of his heritage, has become the architect of immigration policies that repudiate the very foundation of our family’s life in this country.
I shudder at the thought of what would have become of the Glossers had the same policies Stephen so coolly espouses— the travel ban, the radical decrease in refugees, the separation of children from their parents, and even talk of limiting citizenship for legal immigrants— been in effect when Wolf-Leib made his desperate bid for freedom. The Glossers came to the U.S. just a few years before the fear and prejudice of the “America First” nativists of the day closed U.S. borders to Jewish refugees. Had Wolf-Leib waited, his family would likely have been murdered by the N**is along with all but seven of the 2,000 Jews who remained in Antopol. I would encourage Stephen to ask himself if the chanting, torch-bearing N**is of Charlottesville, whose support his boss seems to court so cavalierly, do not envision a similar fate for him.
Like other immigrants, our family’s welcome to the USA was not always a warm one, but we largely had the protection of the law, there was no state sponsored violence against us, no kidnapping of our male children, and we enjoyed good relations with our neighbors. True, Jews were excluded from many occupations, couldn’t buy homes in some towns, couldn’t join certain organizations or attend certain schools or universities, but life was good. As in past generations there were h**e mongers who regarded the most recent groups of poor immigrants as scum, rapists, gangsters, drunks and terrorists, but largely the Glosser family was left alone to live our lives and build the American dream. Children were born, synagogues founded, and we thrived. This was the miracle of America.
Acting for so long in the theater of right wing politics, Stephen and Trump may have become numb to the resultant human tragedy and blind to the hypocrisy of their policy decisions. After all, Stephen’s is not the only family with a chain immigration story in the Trump administration. Trump's grandfather is reported to have been a German migrant on the run from military conscription to a new life in the USA and his mother fled the poverty of rural Scotland for the economic possibilities of New York City. (Trump’s in-laws just became citizens on the strength of his wife’s own citizenship.)
These facts are important not only for their grim historical irony but because vulnerable people are being hurt. They are real people, not the ghoulish caricatures portrayed by Trump. When confronted by the deaths and suffering of thousands our senses are overwhelmed, and the victims become statistics rather than people. I meet these statistics one at a time through my volunteer service as a neuropsychologist for HIAS (formerly the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society), the global non-profit agency that protects refugees and helped my family more than 100 years ago. I will share the story of one such man I have met in the hope that my nephew might recognize elements of our shared heritage.
In the early 2000s, Joseph (not his real name) was conscripted at the age of 14 to be a soldier in Eritrea and sent to a remote desert military camp. Officers there discovered a Bible under his pillow which aroused their suspicion that he might belong to a foreign evangelical sect that would claim his loyalty and sap his will to fight. Joseph was actually a member of the state-approved Coptic church but was nonetheless immediately subjected to torture. “They smashed my face into the ground, tied my hands and feet together behind my back, stomped on me, and hung me from a tree by my bonds while they beat me with batons for the others to see.”
Joseph was tortured for 20 consecutive days before being taken to a military prison and crammed into a dark unventilated cell with 36 other men, little food and no proper hygiene. Some died, and in time Joseph was stricken with dysentery. When he was too weak to stand he was taken to a civilian clinic where he was fed by the medical staff. Upon regaining his strength he escaped to a nearby road where a sympathetic driver took him north through the night to a camp in Sudan where he joined other refugees. Joseph was on the first leg of a journey that would cover thousands of miles and almost 10 years.
Before Donald Trump had started his political ascent promulgating the false story that Barack Obama was a foreign-born Muslim, while my nephew, Stephen, was famously recovering from the hardships of his high school cafeteria in Santa Monica, Joseph was a child on his own in Sudan in fear of being deported back to Eritrea to face execution for desertion. He worked any job he could get, saved his money and made his way through Sudan. He endured arrest and extortion in Libya. He returned to Sudan, then kept moving to Dubai, Brazil, and eventually to a southern border crossing into Texas, where he sought asylum. In all of the countries he traveled through during his ordeal, he was vulnerable, exploited and his status was “illegal.” But in the United States he had a chance to acquire the protection of a documented immigrant.
Today, at 30, Joseph lives in Pennsylvania and has a wife and child. He is a smart, warm, humble man of great character who is grateful for every day of his freedom and safety. He bears emotional scars from not seeing his parents or siblings since he was 14. He still trembles, cries and struggles for breath when describing his torture, and he bears physical scars as well. He hopes to become a citizen, return to work and make his contribution to America. His story, though unique in its particulars, is by no means unusual. I have met Central Americans fleeing corrupt governments, violence and criminal extortion; a Yemeni woman unable to return to her war-ravaged home country and fearing sexual m********n if she goes back to her Saudi husband; and an escaped kidnap-bride from central Asia.
President Trump wants to make us believe that these desperate migrants are an existential threat to the United States; the most powerful nation in world history and a nation made strong by immigrants. Trump and my nephew both know their immigrant and refugee roots. Yet, they repeat the insults and false accusations of earlier generations against these refugees to make them seem less than human. Trump publicly parades the grieving families of people hurt or k**led by migrants, just as the early N**is dredged up Jewish criminals to frighten and enrage their political base to justify persecution of all Jews. Almost every American family has an immigration story of its own based on flight from war, poverty, famine, persecution, fear or hopelessness. These immigrants became the workers, entrepreneurs, scientists and soldiers of America.
Most damning is the administration's evident intent to make policy that specifically disadvantages people based on their ethnicity, country of origin, and religion. No matter what opinion is held about immigration, any government that specifically enacts law or policy on that basis must be recognized as a threat to all of us. Laws bereft of justice are the gateway to tyranny. Today others may be the target, but tomorrow it might just as easily be you or me. History will be the judge, but in the meanwhile the normalization of these policies is rapidly eroding the collective conscience of America. Immigration reform is a complex issue that will require compassion and wisdom to bring the nation to a just solution, but the politicians who have based their political and professional identity on ethnic demonization and exclusion cannot be trusted to do so. As free Americans, and the descendants of immigrants and refugees, we have the obligation to exercise our conscience by v****g for candidates who will stand up for our highest national values and not succumb to our lowest fears.

Dr. David S. Glosser is a retired neuropsychologist: formerly a member of the Neurology faculties of Boston University School of Medicine and Jefferson Medical College.
This just posted by Politico. A long read but wort... (show quote)

I appreciate the pains and trauma that the authors ancestors endured and the successes the have achieved here in the US. However, I noted that in the first individuals story they came here through Ellis Island. That is, an approved gateway to become a legal immigrant and then promptly assimilated to become an American. Not only has President Trump not been against this type of immigration, he has welcomed this type of immigration. Much of the rest of the article is hyperbole and pretty standard anti Trump ranting.
Go to
Aug 14, 2018 12:37:26   #
I have to recommend the book Eco-s**m by Ronald Bailey (1993). It is as applicable today as it was then and outlines the lies and agenda that is still ongoing.
Go to
Aug 14, 2018 12:13:34   #
Fit2BTied wrote:
(Note: I'm posting no facts or no URLs to open this post - just my opinion and my thoughts)
I v**ed for Donald Trump in the 2016 e******n. But it wasn't "My God, where has this guy been - he's the perfect candidate to turn things around in America" at the beginning. In all honesty it was my way of giving the middle finger to Washington DC and the federal government establishment. You know - those wonderful folks who told us they were running for office because they saw what we needed and knew how to make it happen. Then after e******n day they introduced themselves to the lobbyists and started feeding at the trough of graft and corruption like so many of their peers. They built powerful, well-funded organizations that helped to insure they were reelected time and again and faced no accountability to the people who v**ed for them.

And then a series of unexpected things happened. He clawed his way through the primaries, surviving Jeb and Ted and Marco. Then he beat Hillary Clinton in the face of withering mainstream media h**e and despite hundreds of polls that would have discouraged lesser men. Then, and this was the real shocker, he actually was able to accomplish much of what he told us he would. And that was in the face of a vehemently biased press, an activist Hollywood mob, a lock-step bunch of Democrats, and many establishment Republicans who never wanted President Trump to be elected, much less succeed - since it would rock their safe little worlds they'd spent so much effort putting together.

And so we're here now (pre-midterms), getting ready to see whether or not we can reinforce his ability to get Congress to actually pass some decent legislation and the legions of h**e, who were already at 11 on the dial are red-lining their efforts to derail this President. Despite cries of "there's no prejudice in the news media - we're not F**e News!", over 120 newspapers will begin editorially attacking the President on 16 August. Many in the media and sports entertainment world are going non-stop against him. Some lead demonstrations, while others just need an open mike to toss their verbal grenades.

Think about what is actually going on for a minute. They are convinced that they just need to be a little louder, a little more destructive, a little more "in your face" with their h**e. And he's still there. And he's still trying to push through the things he promised us that he would. And he's made mistakes. But be honest. If you faced the $#!+ storm he faces every day - would your performance be impeccable? I know mine wouldn't be close.

So I said all that to say this - it all started for me thinking "if we could just throw a wrench into the workings of that mess that is our government, maybe they'd understand just how much we thought they'd been failing us". And now I'm thankful that what may have started out as a joke to many (remember Seth Meyers saying "Donald Trump said that he was running for president as a Republican. That's funny, because I thought he was running as a joke.") has gotten to this point.

I think it's about time the rest of us grabbed hold of the rope and started pulling in the same direction so that we could not only keep our majorities in both houses, but maybe add a few seats in each of them. I think the President has earned it.
(Note: I'm posting no facts or no URLs to open thi... (show quote)


Well put. I v**ed Trump for much the same reason and I do far have no regret. Thank you for your well reasoned and well written statements
Go to
Aug 11, 2018 09:37:39   #
MR Mister wrote:
The USA Has 40% of the World’s Guns – and Only 4% of the Murders

A Newsweek article back in June attempted to highlight just how crazy it is how many guns there are in America. “Americans have 40 percent of the world’s guns despite being four percent of population,” the headline reads.

They were reporting on the findings of a newly-released study by the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies “Small Arms Survey,” which detailed how there are 1 billion firearms currently in circulation, 85 percent of which are in civilian hands. And of those in civilian hands, a near-majority are in American hands. “Of the 857 million civilian-owned guns noted, 393 million could be found in the U.S., a country of just over 325.7 million people in a world of about 7.6 billion.”

You know the angle that Newsweek is getting at with all this; that the majority of the world’s guns are in America, and that America is rife with gun violence, therefore gun control. What they left out of their article is a lot more important than what they included. Here are the homicide stats as of 2014, with some global context:

• World Population: 7,298,453,033. U.S. Population: 318,857,056 (4.4% of world total).
• World Homicides: 384,553. U.S. Homicides: 14,249 (3.7% of world total).

In other words, Americans commit just 3.7% of the world’s murders, despite having 4.4% of the world’s population and 40% of the world’s firearms.
That certainly throws a wrench in the “more guns, more murders” claim, doesn’t it? Liberals commonly point to the fact that gun homicides are higher in America than other countries, apparently forgetting that there are multiple ways to k**l people.

While it is true that countries with more guns have more gun murders (as guns become the preferred method to carry that out), the correlation isn’t there when it comes to overall murder rates. That could reflect a number of factors; that the increase in gun homicides is offset by guns used in self-defense or simply that people find other ways to carry out murders if they don’t have access to a gun.
Despite the massive outlier the U.S. is, it is not an outlier when it comes to our overall murder rate. Liberals must be at a loss to explain why that is.
Here’s just a sampling of the left-wing hysteria on guns we’ve been recently exposed to in the U.S: You will see they are totally uninformed about firearms.

• “Some of these bullets, as you saw, have an incendiary device on the tip of it, which is a heat-seeking device. So, you don’t shoot deer with a bullet that size. If you do you could cook it at the same time.” – Former Democratic New York Assemblywoman Patricia Eddington. { Lol, shows what he knows, nothing!}

• “What’s the efficacy of banning these magazine clips? I will tell you… these are ammunition, they’re bullets. So the people who have those now, they’re going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the future, the number of these high capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won’t be any more available.” – Colorado Democrat Rep. Diana DeGette. { Lol, no told her they are refillable}

• “We lose 93 million Americans a day to gun violence.” – Democrat Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe. {He has no idea.}

• “…it is easier for a 12- or 13-year-old to purchase a gun, and cheaper than it is for them to get a book.” – Former President of the United States Barack Obama. { Lol, what can one say??}
The USA Has 40% of the World’s Guns – and Only 4% ... (show quote)

A well put together article, but it’s only the tip of a very large iceberg of uninformed statements made by people that have not a clue about firearms. Thanks for putting it out there though
Go to
Aug 11, 2018 09:32:13   #
Airforceone wrote:
Per capita it most certainly is. Memphis is #2 in the the country for violent crimes. As a matter of fact below is the top 5 cities for violent crime meaning Rape, Murder, robberies, and as you can see there red states. So Trump with his continuous lies points at Chicago. But ignorant Trump supporters would never check facts they just believe the pathological liar in the White House and everything else is f**e news.

Chicago for violent crimes per capita does not fall into the top 50.

Now let’s talk murder rates Memphis is at #12 Chicago is at #23.
Per capita it most certainly is. Memphis is #2 in ... (show quote)


No argument with your stats here. However, I wonder which party is in control and leading these cities. Asking for a friend...
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 30 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.