One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Wealth Inequality In America
Page <<first <prev 24 of 28 next> last>>
Apr 17, 2015 00:47:21   #
CounterRevolutionary
 
88RANGER wrote:
nail on the head!!

:thumbup:


thanks for the moral support :)

Reply
Apr 17, 2015 00:55:41   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
Anonymous wrote:
He's dreaming about vaginas butt cake. Kind of weird. This guy says he's a business man but he talks like a ten year old so I somehow doubt he is.


I would tend to think my spelling and vocabulary sky rocketed past anything you could expect to create even if your life was at stake.

As to Vaginas BUTTCAKES....no doubt you need some cleaning equipment such as a can of gas and a firm wire brush to scrub your nasty self off after a round with Homo Harry or BagDad Barry, your lover bois.,.....

Reply
Apr 17, 2015 06:30:21   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
Well, we many not agree on the term "entitlement" of which you have every right to define it in better terms than Congress does, that's OK with me.

The presumption that the public was incapable of planning for its retirement and the government would step in and do it for us because Congress was more competent, is laughable, now the "watchamacallit FICA retirement tax" is $100 $Trillion in debt of unfunded liabilities, not to mention the $600 trillion unfunded liabilities of Medicare. I certainly do not want to be entitled to that!

As far as my 401K, of course, it is not an "entitlement," because is comes from the private sector and my free choice to participate in operating it.

It's not simply "big oil, military and corporations" that are usurping our money, these guys are small potatoes compared to the world economy we subsidize. All nations do not manufacture equally, considering time = money.

But the Progressives view the masses as equal across the globe, where one hour of labor as equivalent to another's hour of labor, no matter who it is. We know this is wrong. Americans produce much more every day; we work harder, longer and smarter. That's why we have a higher standard of living and should make more money. But mysteriously, that money is being honed down.

This is where the Federal Reserve Banks come in, printing endless reams of funny-money and disbursing it around the world, devaluing our dollar to a dime, while propping up every banana republic on earth that should have collapsed half a century ago. We are enslaved to subsidizing this despotism by these Progressive Democrats and old CFR boys operating the Fed's printing presses.

Ever since "Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution," America has financed the rise of Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Mao and the Iranian Ayatollahs, prolonging these monstrous governments that eat their own citizens. Why? In the end, we will all be razed to the lowest common denominator, making a peso an hour, if the Federal Reserve has its way.

We agree that in the long run, nobody has profited off this; human progress has been held back thousands of years. Yes, the wars are awful, and we little Americans are being used. How can we fix this?
Well, we many not agree on the term "entitlem... (show quote)


Oh, but you are wrong. John Perkins wrote a book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" that details how corporations and a few wealthy families profit enormously from tax money funneled through the World Bank, the IMF, the US Agency for International Development for supposed infrastructure projects in the form of "loans" to countries around the world. This would make sure that these countries would remain in debt to their creditors and would then be easy targets when the U.S. needed favors such as military bases, UN votes and access to natural resources, especially oil.

These practices have directly resulted in terrorist attacks and animosity towards the United States.

Here is a brief summary of his book. But the book itself is fascinating reading and exposes many of the lies the US sheople are lead to believe.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/johnperkinseconomichitman.shtml

Reply
 
 
Apr 17, 2015 06:47:12   #
rebob14
 
CounterRevolutionary wrote:
Well, we many not agree on the term "entitlement" of which you have every right to define it in better terms than Congress does, that's OK with me.

The presumption that the public was incapable of planning for its retirement and the government would step in and do it for us because Congress was more competent, is laughable, now the "watchamacallit FICA retirement tax" is $100 $Trillion in debt of unfunded liabilities, not to mention the $600 trillion unfunded liabilities of Medicare. I certainly do not want to be entitled to that!


FDR & Co. never intended SS as anything other than a tax. It was called a "benefit" as a way to flavor the kool aid. The only
reason the charade continues is that too many people (me included) are strung out. To stop telling the lie would be too
disruptive to the power structure. Gid forbid the villagers remember where their torches and pitchforks are!
As far as my 401K, of course, it is not an "entitlement," because is comes from the private sector and my free choice to participate in operating it.

It's not simply "big oil, military and corporations" that are usurping our money, these guys are small potatoes compared to the world economy we subsidize. All nations do not manufacture equally, considering time = money.

But the Progressives view the masses as equal across the globe, where one hour of labor as equivalent to another's hour of labor, no matter who it is. We know this is wrong. Americans produce much more every day; we work harder, longer and smarter. That's why we have a higher standard of living and should make more money. But mysteriously, that money is being honed down.

This is where the Federal Reserve Banks come in, printing endless reams of funny-money and disbursing it around the world, devaluing our dollar to a dime, while propping up every banana republic on earth that should have collapsed half a century ago. We are enslaved to subsidizing this despotism by these Progressive Democrats and old CFR boys operating the Fed's printing presses.

Ever since "Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution," America has financed the rise of Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Mao and the Iranian Ayatollahs, prolonging these monstrous governments that eat their own citizens. Why? In the end, we will all be razed to the lowest common denominator, making a peso an hour, if the Federal Reserve has its way.

We agree that in the long run, nobody has profited off this; human progress has been held back thousands of years. Yes, the wars are awful, and we little Americans are being used. How can we fix this?
Well, we many not agree on the term "entitlem... (show quote)

Reply
Apr 17, 2015 06:51:54   #
rebob14
 
buffalo wrote:
Here's a novel idea. Why not do away with All income tax except on incomes (including capital gains and dividends)over a billion dollars and tax 100% of incomes over a billion. Then tax corporate incomes at 50% and a 50% tariff on imported goods. Yes, prices would rise but only to the extent of what the markets would bear.

Think about that and let it sink in. If the rich and corporations want to control government for their benefit make them pay for it.

I can already envision the attacks of the resident ad



Another reason all taxes should be on consumption, never on income.









hominemer, JMHO. LOL
Here's a novel idea. Why not do away with All inco... (show quote)

Reply
Apr 17, 2015 07:01:27   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
rebob14, The rich typically spend smaller percentages of their income on taxable goods. A consumption tax would hit the middle class and poor disproportionately. Consumption, sales, excise, gas taxes are regressive taxes, favor the rich and hit the middle and poor classes hardest. I am not for them!

Reply
Apr 17, 2015 07:48:04   #
rebob14
 
buffalo wrote:
rebob14, The rich typically spend smaller percentages of their income on taxable goods. A consumption tax would hit the middle class and poor disproportionately. Consumption, sales, excise, gas taxes are regressive taxes, favor the rich and hit the middle and poor classes hardest. I am not for them!


Good point. What is your take on the Fair Tax? It's a flat/
consumption tax concept floated a few years back. I think
it was proposed in the House but didn't go anywhere.

Reply
 
 
Apr 17, 2015 08:30:06   #
Anigav6969
 
Anonymous wrote:
He's dreaming about vaginas butt cake. Kind of weird. This guy says he's a business man but he talks like a ten year old so I somehow doubt he is.


I don't believe anything he says.....well, I do believe him when he says that he would celebrate if the president was assassinated....pretty sick guy....other than that, I don't believe anything he says

Reply
Apr 17, 2015 08:33:48   #
Anigav6969
 
88RANGER wrote:
you have to remember that he would be going up against Hillary and I think a lot more think less of her than you might think. Cruz is in fact the smartest guy when he walks into the room. not quite as smooth as Obama but he definitely would smoke his ass in a debate and he would do the same with Hillary. no matter who goes against Hillary, her true colors are gonna come out and it aint gonna be pretty. she will turn a lot of people off....cant wait to watch!!!


I personally do not like Ted Cruz, and would never vote for him....I don't think he would stand a chance anyway....like you said...this all should be interesting to watch !

Reply
Apr 17, 2015 08:35:53   #
Anigav6969
 
America Only wrote:
I would tend to think my spelling and vocabulary sky rocketed past anything you could expect to create even if your life was at stake.

As to Vaginas BUTTCAKES....no doubt you need some cleaning equipment such as a can of gas and a firm wire brush to scrub your nasty self off after a round with Homo Harry or BagDad Barry, your lover bois.,.....


You're just upset because you've been outed as a supporter of terrorism and unpatriotic.....slither away in shame

Reply
Apr 17, 2015 08:36:39   #
Anigav6969
 
buffalo wrote:
Oh, but you are wrong. John Perkins wrote a book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" that details how corporations and a few wealthy families profit enormously from tax money funneled through the World Bank, the IMF, the US Agency for International Development for supposed infrastructure projects in the form of "loans" to countries around the world. This would make sure that these countries would remain in debt to their creditors and would then be easy targets when the U.S. needed favors such as military bases, UN votes and access to natural resources, especially oil.

These practices have directly resulted in terrorist attacks and animosity towards the United States.

Here is a brief summary of his book. But the book itself is fascinating reading and exposes many of the lies the US sheople are lead to believe.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/johnperkinseconomichitman.shtml
Oh, but you are wrong. John Perkins wrote a book C... (show quote)


Great book !

Reply
 
 
Apr 17, 2015 08:38:52   #
Workinman Loc: Bayou Pigeon
 
Anigav6969 wrote:
I personally do not like Ted Cruz, and would never vote for him....I don't think he would stand a chance anyway....like you said...this all should be interesting to watch !


Can I ask you if you would vote for hillary and if so why?

Reply
Apr 17, 2015 08:47:17   #
Anigav6969
 
Workinman wrote:
Can I ask you if you would vote for hillary and if so why?


It's pretty sad.....I always find myself voting for what I think is the less of two evils.....it matters who she is running against.....I need to hear more from any one of them and Hillary Clinton as well.....we are real early in this , don't you think ?

Reply
Apr 17, 2015 08:48:05   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
rebob14 wrote:
Good point. What is your take on the Fair Tax? It's a flat/
consumption tax concept floated a few years back. I think
it was proposed in the House but didn't go anywhere.


I think it is bullshit. It doesn't address the need to tax corporations and promotes even more economic inequality. It is really nothing more than a national sales tax that would favor, of course, the rich. It is another regressive tax. Look who is supporting it!

I think ALL income over $1 billion annually should be taxes at 100% even corporate income with NO deductions. Oh, but the naysayers say that corporations will just raise prices, ah simple economics tells one that they can raise them only to the extent that the market will bare. Think about it.

Reply
Apr 17, 2015 08:50:54   #
Workinman Loc: Bayou Pigeon
 
Anigav6969 wrote:
It's pretty sad.....I always find myself voting for what I think is the less of two evils.....it matters who she is running against.....I need to hear more from any one of them and Hillary Clinton as well.....we are real early in this , don't you think ?


I'm the same way and it is a shame when we have to vote for the lesser of 2 evils.

Yes real early going to be a long year and a half.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 24 of 28 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.