One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Democrats are for the People?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Oct 2, 2013 18:37:05   #
Artemis
 
snowbear37 wrote:
I have been saying for years that "modern politicians" are in it for the money and power (in that order). Yes, they do think they are above the laws they enact for "everyone else". It's not just the Senate, it's the House, also. These politicians do not want to give up the "lifestyle" they have grown accustomed to (the ones that have made a "career" out of it). They should have to abide by every law they enact and the "perks" and retirement benefits should be based on how many years they "served", lobbyists should be made illegal, and they should have to "work" 5 days a week, every week, they should also not be able to "vote themselves any raises in pay. Until some of these things come to pass, nothing will change. They think they're smarter than everyone else and know what is best for everyone else (no matter what "the people" say). I don't include all politicians in Congress in this opinion, but certainly the majority of them. They have truly forgotten that they were supposed to "serve the people", not the other way around.
I have been saying for years that "modern pol... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 19:12:25   #
Artemis
 
[quote=mmccarty12]





My quotes come back like everyone else' s at the bottom or at the top of the Quote, each persons choice. I have never had anyone have a problem with my English nor my post. That only leaves me to one conclusion, and it's not me having difficulties. Would you like me to leave spaces in between every complete thought, that way your reply will be easier? you can highlight and even use colors!

Getting back on topic. This ACA is affordable insurance, another words... people have to pay for their insurance. Yes some people may get partial assistance through the Federal Government.

Only a small percent of very low income people will get full assistance. Now I know that gets your pants in a bunch, but we can do it ! It has been done by a Republican, you may know him he ran for President and lost, and NOT because of his healthcare law he passed because that has a 87% approval rating;also known as (Affordable Public) Health Care Reform Law.

So why don't we give it a chance?PS this is not being above the law this IS the law. If anyone is behaving above the LAW it is the Tea Baggers GOP

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 21:51:22   #
John Deere
 
emarine wrote:
When we lost our people in 911 that was a national tragedy...We loose 10 fold that every year because health care is too costly for some.... That is also a national tragedy...


That's right. Ever since this stupid Obama care came about the insurance rates have been skyrocketing making it more expensive to purchase health care forcing more people to do without health insurance and Obama care does nothing to stop this insanity, but instead makes it worse. Looks like Obama, Reid, Pelosi, Big Insurance and the AARP are the only ones benefiting from this greedy Marxist crap. It sure isn't the common people. A national tragedy.

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 21:59:57   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
mmccarty12 wrote:
Over the last couple of weeks, Congress has been in a budget battle. According to many polls taken in this Country, depending on which source you really believe, a large majority of American people want the Affordable Care Act(ACA), also known as Obamacare, to be repealed. A humorous side note is that when you call it ACA fewer people want it repealed than when it is called Obamacare.

In the last couple of budget votes in the House, the vote, of course along party lines, was:
1) Defund ACA
2) Delay the individual mandate
3) Make Congress and their staffers not exempt from ACA
(those are the ones I recall and to me are the most important)
Of course, no one believed that the first one would even get consideration, but in the end it did and was voted down easily by the Democrat majority Senate.

Then the House Republicans said, "Ok, if you still will not get rid of it, then let us delay the individual mandate for one year like most of the rest of the ACA has been delayed." Of course, no changes to ACA are allowed by the Republicans, so the Democrat Majority Senate rejected that budget.

Then the House Republicans got even more creative, they said, "Ok, if you want this thing, then you should have to abide by it just like the people you have forced it upon." Well, last night's vote along party lines proves, at least to me, and should prove to even the most hard-nosed Democrat voter, that the Democrats believe themselves to be above the laws they enact.

Another side note, the United States Government, the employer of the members of Congress and their staffers, have their insurance opportunities provided by their employer through private insurance companies. According to ACA, if your employer provides private insurance you are not required to go to the HealthCare Exchanges to obtain your insurance. As the Federal Employees Unions would never allow a renegotiation of their contracts to allow the Federal Government to not provide private insurance opportunities, those members of Congress and their staffers would never be subjected to the requirements and mandates of ACA. By passing the budget as amended, no one in Congress would really be effected and the Federal Government would not be "shut down". But I believe the fear of the Federal Government dropping their private insurance opportunities prevented them from faking out the American people. So I have to ask, "Why did they reject the second budget proposal?"

There have been many debates on this forum, and I am sure on others regarding this topic. I have been and always will remain a believer that the members of Congress and their staffers are OUR employees, not we their subjects, and should be forced to abide by the laws they enact. Last night was just more proof, in my mind, of the disconnect between many of our ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES and ourselves.

Do the members of the Senate who voted against the budget believe themselves above the people?
Do the members of the Senate who voted against the budget believe themselves above the laws they write and enact?
Do the members of the Senate who voted against the budget because it touches upon and possibly damages the credibility of legislation they have been trying to put through for decades?
Do the members of the Senate who voted against the budget reject the bill out of spite? To tell the Republicans in the House that, regardless the will of the people or the Congress(wo)men, they are so much more important?

When is the madness going to end? When will the American people finally stand up for their Constitutional Rights and tell these ELECTED Representatives they are our servants. The calling was to be a public servant in an elected capacity, but they seem to believe that we need to be their servant and can be treated as less than they.

Before anyone calls me a sycophant for the Republican party and Conservative ideals, while it was not mentioned directly, they are as much at fault for this crap as the Democrats.

The House Republicans have had at least a year to come up with, and pass, a budget. They have procrastinated. They caused the delays that have led to the current situation.

Why is it that the budget battle, which should be the first item of business in any new Congress, is the last item of business? The budget for the next year should be ironed out before any other of the bullcrap that Congress puts first in its agenda. But, no, regardless who controls the House, they do not want to do their jobs the way they should be done until it is the last minute because they want to politicize the budget fight, unless one party or another controls both sides of the Legislature.
Over the last couple of weeks, Congress has been i... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Oct 3, 2013 00:14:06   #
Artemis
 
the patriot wrote:
Democrats are for the people?I have watched this battle closely and watched the house compromise and send back to the senate different proposals only to have the senate reject any and all of them. Reid and the senate are doing what Obama wants and that is to ignore the peoples wishes. These politicians have been in Washington for so long they think they can not be replaced, that they are above those that elected them. For the record I am not talking only about democrats, I did say politicians. The fact is that the uninformed people think that congress is only republicans and don't realize that the house is controlled by republicans, and the senate is controlled by democrats and the house and the senate together make up the congress. Find this hard to believe, just poll some people on your own, it will open your eyes to see just how uninformed a lot of people are. I have found that a lot of people are uneducated when it comes to government and how the government works. I listen to the so called experts,do my own research, and come to my own conclusions. I believe that the so called experts advise is what has put us where we are today, lots of book learning, no common sense. It would be wise of all the people to do the same and forget about party.
Democrats are for the people?I have watched this b... (show quote)


I have agreed on that point for a long time.

Reply
Oct 3, 2013 00:48:35   #
Molly
 
mmccarty12 wrote:
Over the last couple of weeks, Congress has been in a budget battle. According to many polls taken in this Country, depending on which source you really believe, a large majority of American people want the Affordable Care Act(ACA), also known as Obamacare, to be repealed. A humorous side note is that when you call it ACA fewer people want it repealed than when it is called Obamacare.

In the last couple of budget votes in the House, the vote, of course along party lines, was:
1) Defund ACA
2) Delay the individual mandate
3) Make Congress and their staffers not exempt from ACA
(those are the ones I recall and to me are the most important)
Of course, no one believed that the first one would even get consideration, but in the end it did and was voted down easily by the Democrat majority Senate.

Then the House Republicans said, "Ok, if you still will not get rid of it, then let us delay the individual mandate for one year like most of the rest of the ACA has been delayed." Of course, no changes to ACA are allowed by the Republicans, so the Democrat Majority Senate rejected that budget.

Then the House Republicans got even more creative, they said, "Ok, if you want this thing, then you should have to abide by it just like the people you have forced it upon." Well, last night's vote along party lines proves, at least to me, and should prove to even the most hard-nosed Democrat voter, that the Democrats believe themselves to be above the laws they enact.

Another side note, the United States Government, the employer of the members of Congress and their staffers, have their insurance opportunities provided by their employer through private insurance companies. According to ACA, if your employer provides private insurance you are not required to go to the HealthCare Exchanges to obtain your insurance. As the Federal Employees Unions would never allow a renegotiation of their contracts to allow the Federal Government to not provide private insurance opportunities, those members of Congress and their staffers would never be subjected to the requirements and mandates of ACA. By passing the budget as amended, no one in Congress would really be effected and the Federal Government would not be "shut down". But I believe the fear of the Federal Government dropping their private insurance opportunities prevented them from faking out the American people. So I have to ask, "Why did they reject the second budget proposal?"

There have been many debates on this forum, and I am sure on others regarding this topic. I have been and always will remain a believer that the members of Congress and their staffers are OUR employees, not we their subjects, and should be forced to abide by the laws they enact. Last night was just more proof, in my mind, of the disconnect between many of our ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES and ourselves.

Do the members of the Senate who voted against the budget believe themselves above the people?
Do the members of the Senate who voted against the budget believe themselves above the laws they write and enact?
Do the members of the Senate who voted against the budget because it touches upon and possibly damages the credibility of legislation they have been trying to put through for decades?
Do the members of the Senate who voted against the budget reject the bill out of spite? To tell the Republicans in the House that, regardless the will of the people or the Congress(wo)men, they are so much more important?

When is the madness going to end? When will the American people finally stand up for their Constitutional Rights and tell these ELECTED Representatives they are our servants. The calling was to be a public servant in an elected capacity, but they seem to believe that we need to be their servant and can be treated as less than they.

Before anyone calls me a sycophant for the Republican party and Conservative ideals, while it was not mentioned directly, they are as much at fault for this crap as the Democrats.

The House Republicans have had at least a year to come up with, and pass, a budget. They have procrastinated. They caused the delays that have led to the current situation.

Why is it that the budget battle, which should be the first item of business in any new Congress, is the last item of business? The budget for the next year should be ironed out before any other of the bullcrap that Congress puts first in its agenda. But, no, regardless who controls the House, they do not want to do their jobs the way they should be done until it is the last minute because they want to politicize the budget fight, unless one party or another controls both sides of the Legislature.
Over the last couple of weeks, Congress has been i... (show quote)


I guess I just don't understand why Republicans just don't get it. The President was reelected with this law already passed, it was backed up by scotus, and the senate is also full of elected officials elected by the people. So 2/3 of the decision makers are democrats. That leaves congress. The 2/3 (President and Senate) have been clear that the ACA is not going to be defunded. So instead of banging your head into a brick wall.. realize that more than half of America put the people you oppose into office. So your will is not the peoples will..... its YOUR will.

The fact that the first budget they sent made it clear they did not care about fixing the budget. Funding every single area of the government EXCEPT the ACA.. were there no other areas that could be cut? They are trying to get what they want without following the rules. Again.

As for the senate.. you say you want them to live by the laws they make. Be allowed to keep your insurance is in there.. maybe they want the same rights everyone else has? For them to keep their insurance would be 100% in line with the ACA.

They don't vote out of spite. They vote because they were elected by people who wanted this. Again, they are both just representing their parties interests and ideals and they were voted in by the people.

They aren't just voting for what they want, they (Senate) are voting based on what their constituents were well aware of and voted them in to support. This is not a new law. Why is it that when a Republican is in office he should do what his continents voted him in to do.. but when a Senator actually does just that it is because they are selfish and not in touch?

Reply
Oct 3, 2013 00:53:19   #
Molly
 
John Deere wrote:
That's right. Ever since this stupid Obama care came about the insurance rates have been skyrocketing making it more expensive to purchase health care forcing more people to do without health insurance and Obama care does nothing to stop this insanity, but instead makes it worse. Looks like Obama, Reid, Pelosi, Big Insurance and the AARP are the only ones benefiting from this greedy Marxist crap. It sure isn't the common people. A national tragedy.


Has this happened to you personally? My insurance rates have been on the rise for about 8 years straight. This year is the first year they won't. If your insurance is terrible now, have you checked your rates? When you say how bad it is for everyone when the exchanges have been opened for one day? The whole point of the ACA IS to stop the insanity of rising health care costs while raising the quality of care and attempting to get people treatment before they end up in a hospital?

Reply
Oct 3, 2013 01:05:15   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
Molly wrote:
I guess I just don't understand why Republicans just don't get it. The President was reelected with this law already passed, it was backed up by scotus, and the senate is also full of elected officials elected by the people. So 2/3 of the decision makers are democrats. That leaves congress. The 2/3 (President and Senate) have been clear that the ACA is not going to be defunded. So instead of banging your head into a brick wall.. realize that more than half of America put the people you oppose into office. So your will is not the peoples will..... its YOUR will.

The fact that the first budget they sent made it clear they did not care about fixing the budget. Funding every single area of the government EXCEPT the ACA.. were there no other areas that could be cut? They are trying to get what they want without following the rules. Again.

As for the senate.. you say you want them to live by the laws they make. Be allowed to keep your insurance is in there.. maybe they want the same rights everyone else has? For them to keep their insurance would be 100% in line with the ACA.

They don't vote out of spite. They vote because they were elected by people who wanted this. Again, they are both just representing their parties interests and ideals and they were voted in by the people.

They aren't just voting for what they want, they (Senate) are voting based on what their constituents were well aware of and voted them in to support. This is not a new law. Why is it that when a Republican is in office he should do what his continents voted him in to do.. but when a Senator actually does just that it is because they are selfish and not in touch?
I guess I just don't understand why Republicans ju... (show quote)


Everyone keeps talking about the Senate and what their constituents want....REALLY. I believe it the House of Representatives who more closely represent constituents. There are only two Senators per state. In fact, historically the Senate was to represent States. House members are more likely to have closer contact with their constituents as they serve a smaller number of people. The truth is a great majority of people would like to see the ACA held for a year. Explain why everybody but the general populace should be exempt from this law?

Reply
Oct 3, 2013 02:10:09   #
Molly
 
How are they exempt? And exactly who are you referring to?

Reply
Oct 3, 2013 02:17:01   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
Molly wrote:
How are they exempt? And exactly who are you referring to?


Although you failed to use "Quote Reply". My presumption is your question is to me. The use of exempt was a glaring error on my part. It should have been delayed. Employer mandates are delayed. Then, we have subsidizes for employees on the Hill. As the labor unions have gone very quiet one can only presume they received some special offer to be quiet. Basically, anybody with enough clout is going to receive an exception. The general populace will end up paying through the nose.

Reply
Oct 3, 2013 02:30:30   #
Molly
 
Is it because most of the exempted people already HAD health insurance so won't be using the exchanges?

Reply
Check out topic: A new subpoena
Oct 3, 2013 02:33:05   #
ABBAsFernando Loc: Ohio
 
Democrats are COMMUNISTS are LIBERALS and as such are card carrying members of the Brotherhood of Darkness.

Isaiah 32

King James Version (KJV)

5 The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful.

6 For the vile person will speak villany, and his heart will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and to utter error against the Lord, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail.

7 The instruments also of the churl are evil: he deviseth wicked devices to destroy the poor with lying words, even when the needy speaketh right.

8 But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand.

The churl is a miser that could be translated into banker. Many Bankers are indeed VILE individuals. The Brotherhood of Darkness is led by CAIN himself. Filled to the brim with EVIL. They love money even more than POWER!

I do not believe Democrats are for anybody but themselves, PERIOD!

Reply
Oct 3, 2013 08:21:40   #
John Deere
 
Molly wrote:
Has this happened to you personally? My insurance rates have been on the rise for about 8 years straight. This year is the first year they won't. If your insurance is terrible now, have you checked your rates? When you say how bad it is for everyone when the exchanges have been opened for one day? The whole point of the ACA IS to stop the insanity of rising health care costs while raising the quality of care and attempting to get people treatment before they end up in a hospital?


If I had the same policy I had 8 years ago it would cost me 4 time more now than it did 8 years ago. You even admitted your insurance has been going up for the last 8 years. Obama has been sitting in the White house for the last 5. How come the rates haven't gone done at all for the last 5 years? You said that Obama care was to stop this. Why hasn't there been a huge drop in the rates now that Oct. 1 has gone by? The rates will NEVER drop and continue to go up and worse yet, now everyone is forced to have this crap, except if you work for Obama's government then you can have a Cadillac policy paid for by the tax payers. Since you think Obama care is so great, how about paying for my health care?

Reply
Oct 3, 2013 10:06:50   #
mmccarty12 Loc: Zionsville, Indiana
 
Molly wrote:
I guess I just don't understand why Republicans just don't get it. The President was reelected with this law already passed, it was backed up by scotus, and the senate is also full of elected officials elected by the people. So 2/3 of the decision makers are democrats. That leaves congress. The 2/3 (President and Senate) have been clear that the ACA is not going to be defunded. So instead of banging your head into a brick wall.. realize that more than half of America put the people you oppose into office. So your will is not the peoples will..... its YOUR will.
I guess I just don't understand why Republicans ju... (show quote)

As you seem to not clearly understand how things work in the Federal Government, I guess it is time for a lesson.
1) The House of Representatives write the budget
2) The Senate votes to approve or disapprove the budget
3) The President signs into law or vetoes the budget.

During its time in 2) the Senate can make amendments which have to be sent back to 1) for a vote. The House then votes up or down. If voted up, it goes back to 2), who will immediately approve it, it has already been approved by the House and Senate, so I am trying to figure out why this second vote in the Senate is necessary. After that it is sent to the President for his signature or veto.

When a budget is amended by the Senate and sent back to the House, if the House votes the budget down, they will amend it and send the amended budget back to the Senate for an up or down vote. They cycle repeats.

Molly wrote:
The fact that the first budget they sent made it clear they did not care about fixing the budget. Funding every single area of the government EXCEPT the ACA.
How is it not clear? Everything but ACA was funded. So they, the House, of course along party lines because a Democrat would never have the courage to vote against the party will, were trying to propose a budget, fund everything but that which they did not want.

Molly wrote:
(W)ere there no other areas that could be cut?
Why must they cut areas that were already in existence, and also fund something that goes against their principles and the wishes of their constituents?

Molly wrote:
They are trying to get what they want without following the rules. Again.
This statement here goes to show me that you do not have a clue about the budget process. THEY WERE FOLLOWING THE RULES and have been since the beginning. Their, the House, second submission put in a delay of the implementation of ACA for 1 year, just like all the other parts of the law were given. That is FAIR, as you Liberals always want to purport you support. Businesses, special interest groups, others were given the option to delay, why should not the conman man of the this country?

Molly wrote:
As for the senate.. you say you want them to live by the laws they make.
Do you know that members of the House and Senate are exempt from the laws against insider trading? Do you have any clues the number of laws passed by Congress and signed into law exempt them from being prosecuted or having the need to obey those laws?

Molly wrote:
Be allowed to keep your insurance is in there.. maybe they want the same rights everyone else has? For them to keep their insurance would be 100% in line with the ACA.

What if I want to keep my insurance, my provider, my healthcare provider and such but my employer, because of the burden of ACA and the need for compliance decides not to continue to offer coverage. Then I have to search for new insurance on the private market. I do not necessarily get to keep any of what they say I will. How many employers have dropped coverage for employees or dropped employee hours to below the full-time employment position so they do not have to abide by the ACA rules?

Molly wrote:
They don't vote out of spite. They vote because they were elected by people who wanted this. Again, they are both just representing their parties interests and ideals and they were voted in by the people. They aren't just voting for what they want, they (Senate) are voting based on what their constituents were well aware of and voted them in to support. This is not a new law.
And the majority of those not on the left want ACA gone. So those who are voting against it are voting for their constituents. How is that different from what those in the Senate are doing? You want ACA, I do not. My Representatives are voting my wishes. Why is that an issue.

Molly wrote:
Why is it that when a Republican is in office he should do what his continents(constituents?) voted him in to do..(?) (B)ut when a Senator actually does just that it is because they are selfish and not in touch?

As I am not really sure how to translate this and make sure I get the message as intended, I can only hope I have it right. You are talking here about a party affiliation(Republican) and an elected official(Senator). An elected representative is supposed to represent the best interest and desires of his/her constituents. If they vote against those interests and/or desires, they can get fired. So what the Republicans in the House are doing is voting in the best interest and according to the desires of their constituents. The Senate, and this is opinion, are the ones voting in spite. There was no reason to reject the delay other than it prevents the start of the implementation of ACA for one year to give time to better work out the bugs. Something that should have been done during the last 4 years it has been law. I can see their reasoning, while not agreeing with it, for voting down the first budget that defunds ACA. The last one, I cannot see why it was unreasonable as well, considering they would not be affected by it anyway and a budget would have been passed. The only reason they voted down the second two proposals because they are unwilling to compromise. They want the Republicans in the House to compromise but are unwilling to do so themselves. The last two proposals were very good attempts, to me, at a compromise.

Who is in the wrong now?

Reply
Oct 3, 2013 10:13:01   #
vernon
 
the patriot wrote:
Democrats are for the people?I have watched this battle closely and watched the house compromise and send back to the senate different proposals only to have the senate reject any and all of them. Reid and the senate are doing what Obama wants and that is to ignore the peoples wishes. These politicians have been in Washington for so long they think they can not be replaced, that they are above those that elected them. For the record I am not talking only about democrats, I did say politicians. The fact is that the uninformed people think that congress is only republicans and don't realize that the house is controlled by republicans, and the senate is controlled by democrats and the house and the senate together make up the congress. Find this hard to believe, just poll some people on your own, it will open your eyes to see just how uninformed a lot of people are. I have found that a lot of people are uneducated when it comes to government and how the government works. I listen to the so called experts,do my own research, and come to my own conclusions. I believe that the so called experts advise is what has put us where we are today, lots of book learning, no common sense. It would be wise of all the people to do the same and forget about party.
Democrats are for the people?I have watched this b... (show quote)

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.