One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Obamacare’s Failures Are Causing Democrats To Become Unhinged
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
Oct 2, 2013 01:53:55   #
claytonln Loc: Kansas
 
Merric.95 wrote:
It is plainly unconstitutional for the federal government to force everyone to buy anything, like hospital insurance, or pay a fine if they don’t. How did Obamacare get approved by the Supreme Court? It’s time to impeach a few judges.


you are exactly right. From what I understand Mr. Roberts rewrote part of it and declared it a tax.

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 02:21:53   #
claytonln Loc: Kansas
 
straightUp wrote:
It's amazing the lies the Republican leaders feed to their devoted fans. Healthcare is a complex matter, requiring complex solutions. ACA is one such example and because if it's complexity it will be impossible to attain a true assessment of the plan before its even implemented. Everything up to then is guess work.

I'm glad the Republicans are loosing this fight. Me and millions of Americans want to give Obamacare a fair chance because the system we have now, the system the Republicans are trying to preserve really sucks.
It's amazing the lies the Republican leaders feed ... (show quote)

You do realize that both sides lie? I am a constitutionalist conservative, not a republican, but I can also understand and relate to what the tea party has been saying. I also agree with alot of it.
Not everything is lies on either side. Over the years the dems have moved to the left. And the republicans have moved to the left right along with them. The tea party is like the old school republicans, center right, not far right just center right. now the establishment republicans has move center left. The Dems of today are not the dems of the 50's and 60's. I don't remember a campaign that was dirty and hateful like the ones of today. they were way more respectful. To me it is shameful and disrespectful to the office and to the country. I have tried to understand where this came from and why. Can you explain why so much venom toward fellow Americans?

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 02:39:25   #
Azkid5011
 
It would be nice if you republicans would actually tell the truth and be factual instead of making generalize statements.Example your Walgreens statement
The following is a statement from Walgreens rational on their insurance decision a lot different than your statement: Under this new program, employees will have expanded choices to personalize their health care coverage in a competitive environment, giving our diverse workforce the flexibility they need to meet their health care needs," said Kathleen Wilson-Thompson, Walgreens senior vice president and chief human resources officer, in a statement. "We will continue to invest in the health of our employees and their dependents while using a marketplace solution that offers a wide variety of plan options that meet the affordability standard of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act."

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2013 02:53:19   #
Azkid5011
 
If you believe when you file a brief with the supreme court and it reviews it, then they rewrite it for you and then approve it. I have a fantastic real estate deal for you. No kidding... I have this land in Florida I inherited, it has white sandy beach front, just gorgeous, but I am willing to sell part of it to you at a below market price, because I like a person who has your kinda of integrity on facts. Just reply how much money you have and we can work out a price

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 08:39:01   #
claytonln Loc: Kansas
 
Azkid5011 wrote:
If you believe when you file a brief with the supreme court and it reviews it, then they rewrite it for you and then approve it. I have a fantastic real estate deal for you. No kidding... I have this land in Florida I inherited, it has white sandy beach front, just gorgeous, but I am willing to sell part of it to you at a below market price, because I like a person who has your kinda of integrity on facts. Just reply how much money you have and we can work out a price

no thanks on land but you can look up the supreme court ruling on the ACA and it will explain what i was referring to in earlier post. It seems that Judge Roberts could not find it constitutional as a healthcare bill due the commerce clause in the constitution. So to make it constitutional he viewed it as a tax and ruled that it was constitutional,"as a tax". Which both the senate and the President said it was not a tax. I was going to put the entire ruling here but it was 193 pages and I thought that was a bit much.
When I said he rewrote I didn't mean literally. The point is that as a healthcare bill it is not constitutional because the government cannot make you buy anything, but it can tax you till the cows come home.

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 09:23:54   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
I believeat the time it could have gone either way but now with all the added mandates I don't believe it would fly. Then it said all people and now too many are excluded.


claytonln wrote:
no thanks on land but you can look up the supreme court ruling on the ACA and it will explain what i was referring to in earlier post. It seems that Judge Roberts could not find it constitutional as a healthcare bill due the commerce clause in the constitution. So to make it constitutional he viewed it as a tax and ruled that it was constitutional,"as a tax". Which both the senate and the President said it was not a tax. I was going to put the entire ruling here but it was 193 pages and I thought that was a bit much.
When I said he rewrote I didn't mean literally. The point is that as a healthcare bill it is not constitutional because the government cannot make you buy anything, but it can tax you till the cows come home.
no thanks on land but you can look up the supreme... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 10:56:32   #
claytonln Loc: Kansas
 
bmac32 wrote:
I believeat the time it could have gone either way but now with all the added mandates I don't believe it would fly. Then it said all people and now too many are excluded.


actually it is not a business so I don't think it could have fell under the commerce clause but I am not sure about that.

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2013 11:07:40   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
The shut down will at some point hurt but it will hurt individuals as much. Give it a year, if people want to join let them but don't force and that's what Harry is doing now. But I believe the democrats know it won't work as planned so after a year it would be thrown out. Their also afraid that if they lose the Senate it'll be over ruled anyway but if by chance it does work the democrats might be safe.

claytonln wrote:
actually it is not a business so I don't think it could have fell under the commerce clause but I am not sure about that.

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 11:20:15   #
claytonln Loc: Kansas
 
bmac32 wrote:
The shut down will at some point hurt but it will hurt individuals as much. Give it a year, if people want to join let them but don't force and that's what Harry is doing now. But I believe the democrats know it won't work as planned so after a year it would be thrown out. Their also afraid that if they lose the Senate it'll be over ruled anyway but if by chance it does work the democrats might be safe.

I just heard there were only 1100 who inquired about it on the first day. it will give 15% of the Pop the chance to have healthcare but, it is not a good thing and I think they are pushing it to make a crisis,"Never let a crisis go to waste" Rahim Emanuel
the more attention that the shutdown is getting the less attention the IRS, fast and furious, Bengazhi, the NSA, are going to get. it's simple they lie, deny and deflect. this is the deflect strategy. the shutdown won't hurt alot but it could if it went on for long. But they will tell us how bad it is hurting people, and don't get me wrong I feel for those that are out of work, but if they were nonessential then maybe they should have a job other than the government.

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 11:24:34   #
willy7
 
Not-a-RINO wrote:
Willy-- You have to understand the mindset of the person who wrote you the reply indicating you need to learn the Constitution. In their world, there is the all-knowing, all-powerful and most-benevolent god of Big Government whose edicts are not to be questioned, but rather obeyed without reservation. In their world, there is no such thing as individual liberty, unalienable rights or the ability to acquire property through hard work, setting goals and providing products people want to purchase. After all, such non-conformist thinking only cheats those who have failed at life's lottery. If you took the time to read Das Kapital and the Communist Manifesto, you would know their bible comes in two parts much like the Christian Bible, but without all the "mind-warping, anti-gay and misogynist indoctrination".

To answer your question, in the above world, the government can force you to do anything it pleases. If you happen to disagree with Obama's desire to double your health care premiums while rationing care, it only proves you're a racist, right-wing, tea-bagging fanatic -- like me. :-)

Have a pleasant evening and keep smiling - you'll ruin some grouch's day!
Willy-- You have to understand the mindset of the ... (show quote)


Thank you for the thoughtful, informative response. You're right, pasting a smile on my face will make the Dems wonder where they failed!
:P

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 11:26:03   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
I heard a number higher than that but for people who actually signed up it was less than 10%, either way not good.

Tom Clancy died!


claytonln wrote:
I just heard there were only 1100 who inquired about it on the first day. it will give 15% of the Pop the chance to have healthcare but, it is not a good thing and I think they are pushing it to make a crisis,"Never let a crisis go to waste" Rahim Emanuel
the more attention that the shutdown is getting the less attention the IRS, fast and furious, Bengazhi, the NSA, are going to get. it's simple they lie, deny and deflect. this is the deflect strategy. the shutdown won't hurt alot but it could if it went on for long. But they will tell us how bad it is hurting people, and don't get me wrong I feel for those that are out of work, but if they were nonessential then maybe they should have a job other than the government.
I just heard there were only 1100 who inquired abo... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2013 11:39:50   #
claytonln Loc: Kansas
 
bmac32 wrote:
I heard a number higher than that but for people who actually signed up it was less than 10%, either way not good.

Tom Clancy died!


ya I heard about Clancy this morning, Just heard they are grilling Clapper on the NSA and he admitted to something, didn't catch what it was tho.

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 11:48:22   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Haven't even turned on the news yes but will after I pick up the grandkids from school.




claytonln wrote:
ya I heard about Clancy this morning, Just heard they are grilling Clapper on the NSA and he admitted to something, didn't catch what it was tho.

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 12:10:58   #
Merric.95 Loc: Midland, Texas
 
The confiscatory Affordable (? Ha, ha) Care Act (ObamaCare) was designed to fail, according the accusation of one man (Jud Anglin who runs a health care business). He contends it was designed by President Obama to be unworkable so that he can install a “single payer” universal health care plan like those in Canada and the UK, which are disasters for those seeking care. In 2003 Obama declared in a speech at a AFL-CIO meeting that he was a proponent of single payer universal health care.
Senator Orrin Hatch warned that politicians “are going to throw their hands in the air and say ‘It’s not working, it’s unaffordable. And we have to go to a single-payer system where the government controls everybody’s lives…It’s already failing. And it hasn’t even triggered the big expenses yet.”
If there really are “needy” citizens who can’t afford health care or mistakenly choose unhealthy practices, they can charitably be given care. That would be much less expensive than attempting to make everyone slaves to the state.

Reply
Oct 2, 2013 12:24:27   #
claytonln Loc: Kansas
 
Merric.95 wrote:
The confiscatory Affordable (? Ha, ha) Care Act (ObamaCare) was designed to fail, according the accusation of one man (Jud Anglin who runs a health care business). He contends it was designed by President Obama to be unworkable so that he can install a “single payer” universal health care plan like those in Canada and the UK, which are disasters for those seeking care. In 2003 Obama declared in a speech at a AFL-CIO meeting that he was a proponent of single payer universal health care.
Senator Orrin Hatch warned that politicians “are going to throw their hands in the air and say ‘It’s not working, it’s unaffordable. And we have to go to a single-payer system where the government controls everybody’s lives…It’s already failing. And it hasn’t even triggered the big expenses yet.”
If there really are “needy” citizens who can’t afford health care or mistakenly choose unhealthy practices, they can charitably be given care. That would be much less expensive than attempting to make everyone slaves to the state.
The confiscatory Affordable (? Ha, ha) Care Act (O... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.