A Newly Defined Disease is Found to be Widespread and Highly Contagious.
January, 2015 - Doctors at the CDC have released a statement this month
disclosing a new disease that has already infected over half of the United States
and is anticipated to continue to spread. The disease itself affects the cells of a
persons entire body then goes dormant. The disease ravages the body and leaves serious side effects.
These side effects have been deemed post Islamic stress trauma with apologetic war fatigue.
Symptoms include:
Severe pain of the scalp from pulling your own hair while viewing our President
pander to Muslim terrorists.
Uncontrollable heartburn at 8:00 pm during the OReilly factor.
Loose bowels from swallowing the fact we elected Obama twice.
Extreme hunger due to vomiting nighyly from seeing Muslims murdering innocent people.
Bleeding from the eyes. This is not Ebola. It is your eyes reacting to accidentally
flipping to a channel that shows Al Sharpton as a legitimate news show host.
Since the disease consumes the entire body, every infected person is then identified
as the disease itself.
The official designation for post Islamic stress trauma with apologetic war fatigue
is PIST-AWF.
If you feel you are PIST-AWF, please notify your local election board and place your name
on the list for a cure. It is expected the cure will be available in November of 2016 and will
be offered by a credible conservative candidate.
A creditable conservative candidate? Let us hope you do a better job in 2016 than you did in 2008 and 2012.
grace scott wrote:
A creditable conservative candidate? Let us hope you do a better job in 2016 than you did in 2008 and 2012.
I don't see it happening. There are good candidates out there, but they will never get elected. They don't have right connections, and both parties have sold us out.
BOHICA wrote:
I don't see it happening. There are good candidates out there, but they will never get elected. They don't have right connections, and both parties have sold us out.
You are, of course, correct. Wouldn't it be nice to make a decision based on who is the best candidate rather than on who will do the least harm?
grace scott wrote:
You are, of course, correct. Wouldn't it be nice to make a decision based on who is the best candidate rather than on who will do the least harm?
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.