One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
"It's About Power"... Saul Alinsky
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
Jan 17, 2015 16:07:22   #
stevenkalka
 
Glaucon wrote:
Alinski specifically cites weakness in Marxism and there is no part in the book that supports Marxism. That just might give a person who has read the book the impression that Alinski wasn't a supporter of Marxism.

I don't want to play any games with you. You have read some select quotes from the book and you and I know you haven't read the book. You can't understand the book with only a one-page Wikipedia bit and a propagandist attempt to select some quotes that could be twisted to seem to mean what they were not meant to be. Again, I highly recommend that you read the book. I would have respect for you if you would read the book, admit you lied about it and took some responsibility. This could be a great possibility for you to learn something about reality and something about yourself. On the other hand, (no pun intended), you could gather with Moldy and Denny and continue your circle jerk.
Alinski specifically cites weakness in Marxism and... (show quote)


He doesn't specifically call for marxism, although he does call for revolution. On page 185 in the final chapter, he says, "All rebels must attack the power states in their society. Our rebels have competuously rejected the values and way of life of the middle class. They have stigmatized it as materialistic, decadent, bourgeoise, degenerate, imperialistic, war-mongering, brutalized, and corrupt. They are right; but we must begin from where we are to build power for change...". He said enough for us deduce he wants revolution, and it's certainly not spiritual or religious in nature. As the book title implies, he's preaching to the choir. He may not specifically call it marxist, yet what else could you call a non-religious revolution? In page 14 in the prologue, he ascribes so much human unhappiness to middles class values. He does cite examples where he may helped certain groups, such as the black employees of Eastman Kodak whom he describes as were only hired for menial jobs before he stepped in. Yet from what I've read fromMr.Alinsky, if he were alive today, I don't think he'd be content if he saw a growing black middle class become as bourgeoise as its white counterpart. He would rather see them become revolutionaries.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.