What's Really Going on Inside the Latest GDP Number
Dec 30, 2014 08:45:06 #
Better sit down before you read this
MORE government Newspeak
By Shah Gilani, Capital Wave Strategist, Money Morning December 30, 2014
It's going to make your head spin and, worse, change the way you think about what's real in America.
Christmas came early this year, for the market that is, by way of a gift from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.
However, this branch of the U.S. Department of Commerce didn't put its gift under anybody's tree. They put it over all of us.
The gift was headline news that the "third revision" of the third-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) number showed the U.S. economy grew at a whopping 5% annualized rate, not the 3.9% rate posted in the "second revision."
That sounds like good news, right?
Well, here's what's scary The Bureau of Economic Analysis Is the "Bad Santa"
"Ho! Ho! Ho!" said the stock market. Good news is now good news on top of bad news being good news for stocks.
And so, with just enough time before Christmas for the stock markets to react, we got a 5% "print" from the BEA, which pushed the Dow Jones Industrial Average above 18,000 while the S&P 500 made yet another all-time high.
Too bad the BEA is lying. The latest revision was a "put-on." The folks at the BEA put it over on all of us.
What they did to get to that 5% number to make us all feel gifted by a robustly recovering economy, to get us to go out and spend, spend, spend, to get stocks to soar was pure sleight of hand. It was pure BS.
I'll prove it to you. Here's what the BEA posted on its own website:
"The GDP estimate released today is based on more complete source data than were available for the 'second' estimate issued last month. In the second estimate, the increase in real GDP was 3.9 percent. With the third estimate for the third quarter, both personal consumption expenditures (PCE) and nonresidential fixed investment increased more than previously estimated.
"The increase in real GDP in the third quarter primarily reflected positive contributions from PCE, nonresidential fixed investment, federal government spending, exports, state and local government spending, and residential fixed investment. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, decreased.
"The acceleration in the percent change in real GDP reflected a downturn in imports, an upturn in federal government spending, and an acceleration in PCE that were partly offset by a downturn in private inventory investment and decelerations in exports, in state and local government spending, in residential fixed investment, and in nonresidential fixed investment."
In the second paragraph, the BEA says the increase "primarily reflected positive contributions from PCE, nonresidential fixed investment, federal government spending, exports, state and local government spending, and residential fixed investment." Then in the very next paragraph, it says that "an upturn in federal government spending, and an acceleration in PCE that were partly offset by a downturn in private inventory investment and decelerations in exports, in state and local government spending, in residential fixed investment, and in nonresidential fixed investment."
What?
How can you have an increase in PCE and the other stuff that was "partly offset by a downturn" in the same stuff the BEA said had increased?
I'll tell you what's going on.
The increase in personal consumption expenditures is all that matters. The BEA increased that number so much in the revision that nothing else matters.
Of course, its double-talk matters, but that's just minor rubbish.
What the BEA gift-givers did in their revisionist juggling act was knock down personal savings by revising savings down over previous months by almost 20% and magically put all that money, about $140 billion, to work in the economy.
And presto, we had 5% GDP growth.
It gets funnier and freakier.
They said most of the increase in spending was on Obamacare. How many people do you know who bought into Obamacare last month?
They said last month we increased our gasoline and energy consumption by a whopping 4.1%. However, I recall oil prices falling almost 50% and gas prices falling more than 20% since late summer.
Go figure.
And about that PCE increase. We whooped it up spending on what? Christmas presents in July, August, and September, long before Black Friday sales and Cyber Monday?
Maybe we did spend $140 billion earlier than we planned to spend on the holidays because we sure didn't spend much on them.
According to most analysts, we saw disappointing Black Friday sales. And ShopperTrack had expected a $10 billion Super Saturday this year, but according to that analyst, sales on the last Saturday before Christmas were up only 0.5% from last year's $9.1 billion.
RetailNext just said spending at specialty stores and large footprint retailers was down 8.9% over the weekend before Christmas versus a year ago. And traffic was down 10.2%.
We better be shopping online!
Okay, that's getting ahead of the third-quarter numbers I'm talking about. But you get the point. How could we have spent $140 billion more in Q3 before the holiday season when the holiday season looks like a mini-bust?
Don't even get me started on home sales.
Just say "Ho! Ho! Ho!" and enjoy the market rally while it lasts. The fabricators in our government bureaus are beholden to the powers that manipulate us all.
By Shah Gilani, Capital Wave Strategist, Money Morning December 30, 2014
It's going to make your head spin and, worse, change the way you think about what's real in America.
Christmas came early this year, for the market that is, by way of a gift from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.
However, this branch of the U.S. Department of Commerce didn't put its gift under anybody's tree. They put it over all of us.
The gift was headline news that the "third revision" of the third-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) number showed the U.S. economy grew at a whopping 5% annualized rate, not the 3.9% rate posted in the "second revision."
That sounds like good news, right?
Well, here's what's scary The Bureau of Economic Analysis Is the "Bad Santa"
"Ho! Ho! Ho!" said the stock market. Good news is now good news on top of bad news being good news for stocks.
And so, with just enough time before Christmas for the stock markets to react, we got a 5% "print" from the BEA, which pushed the Dow Jones Industrial Average above 18,000 while the S&P 500 made yet another all-time high.
Too bad the BEA is lying. The latest revision was a "put-on." The folks at the BEA put it over on all of us.
What they did to get to that 5% number to make us all feel gifted by a robustly recovering economy, to get us to go out and spend, spend, spend, to get stocks to soar was pure sleight of hand. It was pure BS.
I'll prove it to you. Here's what the BEA posted on its own website:
"The GDP estimate released today is based on more complete source data than were available for the 'second' estimate issued last month. In the second estimate, the increase in real GDP was 3.9 percent. With the third estimate for the third quarter, both personal consumption expenditures (PCE) and nonresidential fixed investment increased more than previously estimated.
"The increase in real GDP in the third quarter primarily reflected positive contributions from PCE, nonresidential fixed investment, federal government spending, exports, state and local government spending, and residential fixed investment. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, decreased.
"The acceleration in the percent change in real GDP reflected a downturn in imports, an upturn in federal government spending, and an acceleration in PCE that were partly offset by a downturn in private inventory investment and decelerations in exports, in state and local government spending, in residential fixed investment, and in nonresidential fixed investment."
In the second paragraph, the BEA says the increase "primarily reflected positive contributions from PCE, nonresidential fixed investment, federal government spending, exports, state and local government spending, and residential fixed investment." Then in the very next paragraph, it says that "an upturn in federal government spending, and an acceleration in PCE that were partly offset by a downturn in private inventory investment and decelerations in exports, in state and local government spending, in residential fixed investment, and in nonresidential fixed investment."
What?
How can you have an increase in PCE and the other stuff that was "partly offset by a downturn" in the same stuff the BEA said had increased?
I'll tell you what's going on.
The increase in personal consumption expenditures is all that matters. The BEA increased that number so much in the revision that nothing else matters.
Of course, its double-talk matters, but that's just minor rubbish.
What the BEA gift-givers did in their revisionist juggling act was knock down personal savings by revising savings down over previous months by almost 20% and magically put all that money, about $140 billion, to work in the economy.
And presto, we had 5% GDP growth.
It gets funnier and freakier.
They said most of the increase in spending was on Obamacare. How many people do you know who bought into Obamacare last month?
They said last month we increased our gasoline and energy consumption by a whopping 4.1%. However, I recall oil prices falling almost 50% and gas prices falling more than 20% since late summer.
Go figure.
And about that PCE increase. We whooped it up spending on what? Christmas presents in July, August, and September, long before Black Friday sales and Cyber Monday?
Maybe we did spend $140 billion earlier than we planned to spend on the holidays because we sure didn't spend much on them.
According to most analysts, we saw disappointing Black Friday sales. And ShopperTrack had expected a $10 billion Super Saturday this year, but according to that analyst, sales on the last Saturday before Christmas were up only 0.5% from last year's $9.1 billion.
RetailNext just said spending at specialty stores and large footprint retailers was down 8.9% over the weekend before Christmas versus a year ago. And traffic was down 10.2%.
We better be shopping online!
Okay, that's getting ahead of the third-quarter numbers I'm talking about. But you get the point. How could we have spent $140 billion more in Q3 before the holiday season when the holiday season looks like a mini-bust?
Don't even get me started on home sales.
Just say "Ho! Ho! Ho!" and enjoy the market rally while it lasts. The fabricators in our government bureaus are beholden to the powers that manipulate us all.
Dec 30, 2014 10:07:36 #
The Federal Reserve Board's 'Quantitative Easing' in each of Obama's six years as President has averaged approximately $1.4 trillion a year, but is not being used to stimulate the economy, but instead is used to buy US Treasury Bonds in order to cover Obama's and the Democrats' record setting deficits for each of the last six years, for which the US Treasury can no longer find anyone else to buy these bonds in order to cover those deficits. This allows the federal government to infuse this $1.4 trillion into the economy through entitlement programs, falsely skewing the GDP statistics because the economy did not produce these moneys, but were instead printed out of thin air by the Federal Reserve Board, with no intrinsic value, but devalues all US Dollars already in circulation, and causes a false GDP number, just as Obama has also caused a false Unemployment Rate by dropping over 15 million unemployed people from the 'US Workforce' in order to lower the unemployment statistics to a false and untrue lower rate, and none of these 15 million unemployed people dropped, have ever been added back into the 'US Workforce', and now the Obama administration reports that there are another 9 million unemployed people still in the 'US Workforce', showing that with those unemployed 15 million dropped, over 24 million people have lost their jobs during the five years and six months of the false economic recovery Obama declared in June 2009, because of the false and untrue GDP statistics that Obama skewed through the infusion of the Federal Reserve Board's 'Quantitative Easing' 'Fiat Dollars', that's been used to buy US Treasury Bonds to cover Obama's deficits, created by the tremendous amounts of dollars our entitlement programs of 'Welfare', 'Food Stamps' (EBT Cards & SNAP Program)', 'Unemployment Benefits' and 'Disability' have used to pay for all the people who lost their jobs to live off of.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.