Rand Paul uses Obama's words against him.
Rand Paul is taken seriously by fools and nutballs.
Inyourface wrote:
Rand Paul is taken seriously by fools and nutballs.
So, Obama really didn't say this even if he's on the video saying it? You're becoming more retarded everyday.
Navysnipe wrote:
So, Obama really didn't say this even if he's on the video saying it? You're becoming more retarded everyday.
He said it, and right or wrong, if he goes against the will of the people, via Congressional vote, it would be a mistake if The President acts against that vote.
Congress would have to live with their decision, along with the people, if non-action proves to be a mistake.
I am against intervention, but there is certainly as much evidence for the strike as there was for entry into many of the military interventions of the past 50 years.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me 7-8 times, shame on me. I'm tired of seeing young Americans die, or suffer for years, due to our foreign policy mistakes. I witnessed it personally during my stint in the Viet Nam War, and have, ever since...first hand.
If Congress approves the strike, then I think every legislator should be required to have at least one family member serve on the front lines if things escalate into anything resembling all-out war. Preferably, a son or daughter, or grandson/granddaughter. Certainly, someone of significance to them.
Let them share in the experience of war, with a personal investment.
slatten49 wrote:
He said it, and right or wrong, if he goes against the will of the people, via Congressional vote, it would be a mistake if The President acts against that vote.
Congress would have to live with their decision, along with the people, if non-action proves to be a mistake.
I am against intervention, but there is certainly as much evidence for the strike as there was for entry into many of the military interventions of the past 50 years.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me 7-8 times, shame on me. I'm tired of seeing young Americans die, or suffer for years, due to our foreign policy mistakes. I witnessed it personally during my stint in the Viet Nam War, and have, ever since...first hand.
If Congress approves the strike, then I think every legislator should be required to have at least one family member serve on the front lines if things escalate into anything resembling all-out war. Preferably, a son or daughter, or grandson/granddaughter. Certainly, someone of significance to them.
Let them share in the experience of war, with a personal investment.
He said it, and right or wrong, if he goes against... (
show quote)
I agree with sending "their" children to fight "their" wars. But we're not likely to ever see it happen.
Navysnipe wrote:
I agree with sending "their" children to fight "their" wars. But we're not likely to ever see it happen.
With that, I also agree. Examples of such are few and far between. It wasn't so in the distant past.
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
slatten49 wrote:
He said it, and right or wrong, if he goes against the will of the people, via Congressional vote, it would be a mistake if The President acts against that vote.
Congress would have to live with their decision, along with the people, if non-action proves to be a mistake.
I am against intervention, but there is certainly as much evidence for the strike as there was for entry into many of the military interventions of the past 50 years.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me 7-8 times, shame on me. I'm tired of seeing young Americans die, or suffer for years, due to our foreign policy mistakes. I witnessed it personally during my stint in the Viet Nam War, and have, ever since...first hand.
If Congress approves the strike, then I think every legislator should be required to have at least one family member serve on the front lines if things escalate into anything resembling all-out war. Preferably, a son or daughter, or grandson/granddaughter. Certainly, someone of significance to them.
Let them share in the experience of war, with a personal investment.
He said it, and right or wrong, if he goes against... (
show quote)
I am known well for being pedantic and verbose. I will keep my response quite brief.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
I could have placed more. That was brief! :!: :!:
Navysnipe wrote:
I agree with sending "their" children to fight "their" wars. But we're not likely to ever see it happen.
You fools get more unhinged everyday. President Obama has made you lose all perspective,he brought your virulent racist feelings to the surface and now you root for dictators and monsters,suck up to the,corrupt ,Insurance industry,and spit upon your fellow working class Americans. All pretty pathetic.
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
Inyourface wrote:
You fools get more unhinged everyday. President Obama has made you lose all perspective,he brought your virulent racist feelings to the surface and now you root for dictators and monsters,suck up to the,corrupt ,Insurance industry,and spit upon your fellow working class Americans. All pretty pathetic.
So you believe we should intervene in Syria?
AuntiE wrote:
So you believe we should intervene in Syria?
No, not in Syria and not in the Gaza,the West Bank,etc. either
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.