One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Very Big, perhaps irreconcilable, difference between Liberal and Conservative
Page <<first <prev 5 of 11 next> last>>
Nov 14, 2014 18:21:38   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
MT Patriot wrote:
Jack Sequim WA,
Jack I really think you have misinterpreted Rumitoids message, try reading the first sentence in the second paragraph, I felt that his message was that with all the fanfare our war heroes get we can not forget the husbands and fathers who fight every day to feed and cloth his family. to a hungry child and mother he is a definite hero and I must agree. The high steel workers, the miners, cops and emergency medical workers as well as fire fighters and countless others put their life in danger daily to support someone. They do jobs that many of us wouldn't even consider. Jack I hope you understand and Rhumitoid I hope I read you right.
Jack Sequim WA, br Jack I really think you have mi... (show quote)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I hear what you say, and to a degree I concur. However, there are lots of descriptors for men - heroism not belonging to too many. A hero is one who puts his life on the line with no necessary good outcome for HIM. He may die being a hero. So might a high rise steel worker die while doing his job, and while we appreciate there are people who can do such work, it doesn't rise to the hero level. A father who looks after his family is a good men to be respected, but he is no hero for that alone. If I were a man, I honestly believe I'd rather be labeled "respected" than heroic. Heroes are heroes to those he saves as a result of his actions.......sometimes firemen and policemen are heroes......sometimes ordinary people with safe jobs rise to the level of heroes. A hero can actually be a sob in real life, but still be considered a hero for putting his life on the line in order to protect ours. Our flag is waved for military heroes because they acted for the good of the nation which our flag identifies. And a simply respected man may do heroic things and be called a hero, but unless his heroism was in the military, waving the stars and stripes is not particularly proper because the flag represents the nation,not individuals.

Reply
Nov 14, 2014 19:26:24   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I hear what you say, and to a degree I concur. However, there are lots of descriptors for men - heroism not belonging to too many. A hero is one who puts his life on the line with no necessary good outcome for HIM. He may die being a hero. So might a high rise steel worker die while doing his job, and while we appreciate there are people who can do such work, it doesn't rise to the hero level. A father who looks after his family is a good men to be respected, but he is no hero for that alone. If I were a man, I honestly believe I'd rather be labeled "respected" than heroic. Heroes are heroes to those he saves as a result of his actions.......sometimes firemen and policemen are heroes......sometimes ordinary people with safe jobs rise to the level of heroes. A hero can actually be a sob
in real life, but still be considered a hero for putting his life on the line in order to protect ours. Our flag is waved for military heroes because they acted for the good of the nation which our flag identifies. And a simply respected man may do heroic things and be called a hero, but unless his heroism was in the military, waving the stars and stripes is not particularly proper because the flag represents the nation,not individuals.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ br I hear what you say,... (show quote)



Excellent points that needed to be expanded, as you have done. One thought I have is regarding the flag. The flag represents the nation, not the individual, my thought is......isit not the one who enters volunteering to put oneself in harms way for the nation, is it not these individuals that make up the nation, are representatives of the nation, waving a flag to those that make it possible to be a nation. Whom without, we would not exist.

Reply
Nov 14, 2014 19:34:26   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
Excellent points that needed to be expanded, as you have done. One thought I have is regarding the flag. The flag represents the nation, not the individual, my thought is......isit not the one who enters volunteering to put oneself in harms way for the nation, is it not these individuals that make up the nation, are representatives of the nation, waving a flag to those that make it possible to be a nation. Whom without, we would not exist.


You are absolutely correct - these men REPRESENT the nation, speak for the nation, and carry out the nation's battles. Excellent point!!! :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Check out topic: Good news for Trump
Nov 14, 2014 23:06:18   #
stymie
 
MT Patriot wrote:
Jack Sequim WA,
Jack I really think you have misinterpreted Rumitoids message, try reading the first sentence in the second paragraph, I felt that his message was that with all the fanfare our war heroes get we can not forget the husbands and fathers who fight every day to feed and cloth his family. to a hungry child and mother he is a definite hero and I must agree. The high steel workers, the miners, cops and emergency medical workers as well as fire fighters and countless others put their life in danger daily to support someone. They do jobs that many of us wouldn't even consider. Jack I hope you understand and Rhumitoid I hope I read you right.
Jack Sequim WA, br Jack I really think you have mi... (show quote)


I concur with "DD" wherein he advised you of disrespect Rumitiod intended to heap on our warriors. As a individual that served and a grandfather that has a grandson leaving this coming Tuesday I find this thread by Rumy as disgusting as any I have read. However, having been on OPP for some time and perhaps understanding him better than some will say that he accomplished his intent by drawing attention to himself. He is a deeply troubled individual deserving only of our pity. Do not allow him to upset or anger you for that is his intent also. Really despicable individual that deserves to be ignored.

P.S. And to think I once said that albeit that he was misguided by his views he had a good heart. I now sadly withdraw that statement about having a good heart, admit I was wrong and declare him a enemy of the Republic. Oh wait, being a enemy of the Republic would just put him in with the rest of the Obama supporters. :hunf:

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 02:49:16   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
stymie wrote:
I concur with "DD" wherein he advised you of disrespect Rumitiod intended to heap on our warriors. As a individual that served and a grandfather that has a grandson leaving this coming Tuesday I find this thread by Rumy as disgusting as any I have read. However, having been on OPP for some time and perhaps understanding him better than some will say that he accomplished his intent by drawing attention to himself. He is a deeply troubled individual deserving only of our pity. Do not allow him to upset or anger you for that is his intent also. Really despicable individual that deserves to be ignored.

P.S. And to think I once said that albeit that he was misguided by his views he had a good heart. I now sadly withdraw that statement about having a good heart, admit I was wrong and declare him a enemy of the Republic. Oh wait, being a enemy of the Republic would just put him in with the rest of the Obama supporters. :hunf:
I concur with "DD" wherein he advised yo... (show quote)




:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 02:52:44   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
MT Patriot wrote:
Jack Sequim WA,
Jack I really think you have misinterpreted Rumitoids message, try reading the first sentence in the second paragraph, I felt that his message was that with all the fanfare our war heroes get we can not forget the husbands and fathers who fight every day to feed and cloth his family. to a hungry child and mother he is a definite hero and I must agree. The high steel workers, the miners, cops and emergency medical workers as well as fire fighters and countless others put their life in danger daily to support someone. They do jobs that many of us wouldn't even consider. Jack I hope you understand and Rhumitoid I hope I read you right.
Jack Sequim WA, br Jack I really think you have mi... (show quote)



Respectful, I stand on my reply. There are many threads that agree in what it is he was really trying to convey, which is warped, self serving attention getting disrespect.

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 03:17:58   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
I also agree with your post.
jack sequim wa wrote:
Respectful, I stand on my reply. There are many threads that agree in what it is he was really trying to convey, which is warped, self serving attention getting disrespect.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 03:35:15   #
rumitoid
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
Reality is more bizarre than fiction, and once again you prove true to bizarre!!!!
Any man that volunteers to shed his blood and/or life, defending his brothers and sisters of our great nation. Defending against evil, that would harm or kill, threaten freedoms.
That man is my brother in our great nation, and God bless him a hero for his courage to volunteer in harms way, to give his life for mine.

How dare you make good evil!!!!!!!!! When I wave my flag upon his victory, it is not for the blood he spilled, but for his willingness to spill his.
The most sacred we hold to, is our Almighty God and life God had given us, until we go to be with our Lord, and my brother willing to give away such sacred thing as his breath in this life!!!

Your perspective is offensive and appalling, to me and many others that wave our flags, with regard to our nations heroes!!!
Reality is more bizarre than fiction, and once aga... (show quote)


Jack, you forget the other side that volunteered was thinking the same thing: defense against evil. This is why patriotism sucks and is wrong. It has no eyes or moral compass. We may want to assign such, yet does not fit the definition.

Do not get entangled in worldliness...

I am a Vet. I would never betray my brothers in arms. So, please r-visit what I said before your blind criticism.

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 03:35:49   #
rumitoid
 
Hemiman wrote:
Why don't you get on you're little mo ped and drive off a cliff,asshole.


Did that.

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 03:46:36   #
larrypuckett1939
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 03:54:34   #
MT Patriot Loc: originally Florida
 
PAFRET,
I agree but it must be pointed out that we conservatives are not opposed to change as long as it is in the right direction but we do try to avoid the continuous comedy of error that has been there specialty for at least the last 5-6 years.

Liberals cannot exist without the conservatives because we fight for their right to say and do the things they do, wrong or right. We fight for their right to even exist in our society. However, the liberals would just as soon that we didn't exist and they do absolutely nothing for us, but that is okay because we conservatives could exist as we are happy and healthy totally without them.

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 03:59:14   #
rumitoid
 
Loki wrote:
In all fairness, he said that those who serve are not to be attacked. I disagree with part of his last statement. There are times when flag waving over a fallen enemy is VERY appropriate. I smile everytime I read about or hear about a terrorist who one of our guys "convinced" to lay down and quit breathing. War, or rather having to fight, is no cause for celebration. Fighting and winning after we have been attacked is definitely a cause to wave a flag. Almost every time a terrorist dies and an American doesn't, it is a cause for happiness. I say almost because there are some Liberals whose loyalty is a big question mark in my mind.
What is needed is a new type of terrorist; one who only kills people who defend terrorism.

There are two steps to effectively fighting terrorism. First, kill terrorists. Secondly, make the ones you missed too afraid to attack you further. Fear has to overcome fanaticism. Most terrorist assholes consider themselves brave and honorable warriors for their willingness to kill innoncent and mostly unarmed civilians. They need to be disabused of this notion.
Remember Sun Tzu: "Supreme excellence in warfare consists of destroying the enemy's will to fight."

There are no good wars; but there are bad wars with good endings. These, we celebrate.
In all fairness, he said that those who serve are... (show quote)


I really expected something different from you. Not that your are necessarily wrong in your view as presented but that you are not as inclusive as I thought you would be. But we may be talking about two different levels.

I never fired my weapon at the enemy in Viet Nam; not because I was against it but I just never had the opportunity. I faced no direct threat there and had an existence very close to Club Med: all the amenities. "Messed" with officers eating the best of food; air-conditioned office; regular hours not strictly regulated; hot showers and plenty of free time; privileged as a crypto-clerk to my own space. But pn one of those occasions I had to go out to the yucky field (LOL), my delicate (and utterly safe) sensibilities were tampered with: a group of GIs were doing some "unsavory" things to the Viet Cong dead that had attacked their position. This was necessarry "flag-wagging." No need to explain why, though I did not get it then.

Yet promoting this as righteous and just in society diminishes our humanity and makes this world an accursed place to dwell. I could say "ergo" here but it is too soon. War is hell, and that is the story.

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 04:03:56   #
rumitoid
 
Tasine wrote:
You should be respected for taking care of the children you sired. Providing for your children isn't quite as dangerous as having an enemy constantly trying to kill you. The soldier should receive the hero's welcome home for putting his life on the line for others. It's simple. One is a hero, the other is a father with the responsibility to raise the children he brings into the world. Most of the men in the military are BOTH soldiers AND fathers.


My point was that I was also in country. a soldier. The glorification of war can be subtle and in that subtlety the soul sucked from some generation for the ugly price of national interest.

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 04:06:43   #
rumitoid
 
Mom8052 wrote:
**********************************
Loki I agree with you. Now, does anyone know why we wave the Flag? Let me explain why the Liberals are jerks for not caring about the Constitution and their oath taken to serve our country.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/YaxGNQE5ZLA

God Bless our troops for volunteering to keep our Country safe. God Bless the Fathers and Mothers who have raised their children to love our country. If Liberals and Conservatives can agree on only on thing......it would be our Flag, symbol of our Great Nation.
********************************** br Loki I agree... (show quote)


No, not hardly, and that notion is a disgrace to our Republic: it is "we the people," not some piece of lifeless clothe.

Reply
Nov 15, 2014 04:10:55   #
rumitoid
 
Ronald Hatt wrote:
The "celebration" of the death of a human being, must be considered from evry angle. While I would agree with most of what you say, there are times when humanity could appropriately "celebrate" the death of a fellow human being. This brings to mind several names to which I shall give revelation on for "some": Saddam Hussein, John Wayne Gacy, Jeffery Dahmer, John Norman Collins, Hitler, Pol pot, Mussolini, idi Ameen, Timothy McVeigh, & "so on"! The celebrant, must be invested in vengeance, through direct loss, or passion of belief! Serial killers, are considered vile, & despotic individuals, that deserve killing, however that is done. These people earned the right to death, because they have no place, in our society! Those that don't respect human life, laws, et al.........must be removed, & mostly, the ones described above, really are a threat to any living people in our society........There are really instances that capital punishment, "fits the occasion", regardless of what the die hard Libtards, say, or the "Pope" says! Difference between Liberal's, * COnservatives, is; Conservatives, are "realistic", & pragmatic about heinous killers, & believe they need to die, for the sake of a safe society. Liberals, although most don't believe that way, would spare the life of such criminals, but have no problem sucking the brains out of a not yet born baby, still in the birthing canal, & "murder" the innocent child!.......Yes, America, there are several differences between Liberal, & Conservative! This one, I just can't "wrap my head around"! I choose to be Conservative!.................... :shock:
The "celebration" of the death of a huma... (show quote)


Sorry, that is not how I see it. Celebrating the death of any human being is an attack on humanity as a whole. No exceptions. Just my view.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.