eagleye13 wrote:
Funny you should call me "pal"
You have ways of identifying what you are.
For those on the side; just spend a few minutes watching Builing 7 go down. Complete pulverization. Tons and tons of dust.
Blah, blah, blah...yawn...ho hum...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Question for you: how many videos have you ever seen showing a building coming down after two huge buildings close by just came down? How many? How many incidents of that nature have occurred? How much statistical data do you have of buildings coming down when two buildings of the size and construction (not to mention geographical location and soil content) of the twin towers have just come down nearby? I'll tell you...nil, nada, zilch, zero!
I have seen those articles. Truthers believe that the federal government went into a major business skyscraper and planted explosives and treated support columns that have walls protecting them with some substance to weaken them without anyone noticing. I also heard that this same government faked a plane in Pennsylvania (though no reason is given for why this would need be done) and against the Pentagon so that a government that owns literally thousands of passenger jets could not find enough airplane parts to make it look like a real plane crashed there.
BTW, there are millions of "architects and engineers" in the USA so getting 1/10 of 1% of them to sign a petition is no big deal.
eagleye13 wrote:
Oh: I remember you too! You're the one that is to ... (
show quote)
Yep; my little ostrich. Just ignore the evidence. Just as America did with the JFK assassination.
eagleye13 wrote:
Yep; my little ostrich. Just ignore the evidence. Just as America did with the JFK assassination.
Ooooh, and what happened in the JFK assassination? Another one of your conspiracies? Are you going to tell me some one was on the grassy knoll? Or, the mob did it? Or, the Cubans?
Gotta love these responses from our leftist koolaid drinkers!!:
The 16 Most Epic Democratic Underground MELTDOWNS Over The 2014 Republican Rout
Eric Owens 6:07 AM 11/05/2014
1851
275
Getty Images, Getty Images, Getty Images/Archive Photos, Getty Image
What is best in life? Well, experiencing Tuesday nights meltdown at Democratic Underground is certainly nowhere near the top of the list, but it was halfway entertaining for a Tuesday night.
Below are the greatest hits from a night filled with intense rage, frustration, more rage, sadness and confusion among users at the interactive leftist website.
Psycho
FLyellowdog: This whole election is leaving me with some very scary feelings. And Im simply sick
physically sick
and emotionally drained.
tinfoil hat YouTube screenshot Ephemeral Rift
sammy750: The GOP is the biggest scandal of the century. Huge voter suppression and fixing the voting machines so they didnt register right. The GOP is the biggest fraud, AG Holder will be busy undoing all the GOP fraud wins
7 Restaurant Gimmicks You Shouldn't Fall
Bankrate
A New Site Unmasks People's Past!
BeenVerified People Search
Unbelievable: One-Third Of WrestleMania
ThePostGame
Inside Tom Brady And Gisele's New L
LonnyMag
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
anger 4 Getty Imagesglobal1: So The American Voters Have Rewarded The ReThugs For Shutting Down The Government
.obstructing everything President Obama wanted to accomplish; sticking with the NRA; refusing to raise the minimum wage; refusing to deal with the immigration issue; piling more debt on students/student loans; voting to repeal ACA over 50 times when the American People finally had some relief on health insurance; and the list goes on and on. What is wrong with the American People. They believe the lies. They like to be lied to. They vote against their better interests.
Devin Townsend Portrait Shoot
akbacchus_BC: This is what I do not understand, how could the Rethugs get elected again? What is wrong with some Americans? Did Democrats not vote? Now the President cannot get anything done unless it is by Executive Order. I really wish the President could tell the rethugs to piss off and sign as much policies by Executive Order and piss them off more and they cannot impeach him, bunch a idiots. This President tried to work with the assholes but man, they did not want to work with him.
jester Getty Images
hedgehog: So, MSNBC is predicting the Republicans hold the House How? Is it all due to gerrymandering?
angry Getty ImagesUnknown Beatle: What the fuck is the matter with this nation? Things arent getting better, theyre getting worse, and as hard as we try and yell and cuss, no one is doing shit about all the criminality going on with the banks, politicians, and anyone that breaks the law as long as theyre filthy rich. Im so fucking pissed off right now I cant see straight. My blood pressure is sky high. I need to take it easy.
upset person Getty Images
KingCharlemagne: I am deeply disappointed in my fellow Americans tonight. The suffering that will ensue was and is mostly entirely preventable. So I am disappointed that we shall have to endure this suffering for at least 2 years now because Americans could not see through the lies sold to them by this pack of charlatans, demagogues and scalawags. Yes, the Democrats largely ran away from President Obama after allowing the Republicans to frame the race as Obama, Obama, Obama and that bespeaks a party in trouble. But in the final analysis, voters chose to vote against their self-interest and against the interest of their compatriots for what? To send a message to Dems? The reality is that things will not get better in the next two years. They will get worse and possibly much, much worse. And so I am disappointed that my fellow Americans chose a path that will cause suffering for their countrymen when I have to believe most of them did not seek to cause such suffering.
Getty Images/Chip Somodevilla
BlueDemKev: MSNBC has called Colorado for Gardner. WTF, Colorado? Are you that pissed off because Pres. Obama asked Congress for some token gun regulations after 20+ elementary school students were slaughtered just a week before Christmas?
guy screaming on the phone Creative CommonsAmpersand Unicode: Im actually scared as in cant-sleep-tonight-Halloween-came-five-days-late scared of the GOP fascists taking over the Kennedy state. I voted for Coakley but am not optimistic because of all the endorsements Baker has gotten and the past history of electing GOP governors (Romney, Weld). Im also looking to leave because MA just voted to keep the filthy casinos. Also, there is a gun store that just popped up out of nowhere down the street from my house on a main street. I no longer feel safe in my neighborhood or my state. Should I find a way to move to Vermont where Bernie and the sane people live? Or if I cant afford to leave, should I just do myself in? I honestly am terrified that were living in the decline of the Weimar Republic and the rise of the Reich.
barf bag Getty Images
DebJ: Tonight doesnt make me wish I had quit smoking. An early death would be merciful compared to a long slow one with insufficient nutrition and no health care, which is what is coming up. Im torn, cant decide in which order to cry and vomit and get sick.
tree hugger Getty Images
2naSalit: If anyone thinks we, as a nation, have any chance of saving ourselves from our wanton disregard for the biosphere which supports our existence, this election has proven we dont really give a rats ass about our own sorry asses (or that of anyone else). Unless there is some major infrastructure destroying catastrophe that some of us survive before the biosphere is toast, our species is in for some big trouble. I suspect we are in for a lot more trouble than any of us have bargained for. With our distractions keeping us from looking around and seeing how destructive our way of life has become and that we could have each personally done something to change it
and we have no one but ourselves to blame. So brace yourselves for the gloom and doom of losing your habitat, like most other species have been facing for quite a while now, because were next on the menu.
smug guy Getty Images
CK_John: I think the President has to put resignation on the table and not give them the satisfaction of being impeached.
Getty Images/Mark Spowart
whereisjustice: If youve been to Asia and witnessed the slums and factory farms filled with impoverished workers, the US has just taken another step in that direction tonight. Sure, were not there yet. But that doesnt mean we arent going to get there. Like global warming, the change isnt noticeable when all you look at is your backyard thermometer. Its coming. Sooner or later it is going to catch up with you and your children.
Lenin square propaganda Getty Images Culture Clubupaloopa: So now that we have nothing more to lose how about taking our party on a hard turn to the left. Lets come up with every progressive idea we can and put together a liberal platform for 2016. Never compromise with the devil
angry 3 Getty Imagesbrett_jv: I wish I could chalk it up to All this election PROVES is that >50% the people who showed up to vote in 6 states
are mouth-breathing, brain-washed, Faux-Watching knuckle-draggers, but the reality is, it goes MUCH deeper than that. Nearly 1/2 the country are this way. This is proof that lies and propaganda
work. This election shows that a great many people in this country
are actually either morons, or they are evil.
Clement Vallandigham public domainzelduh: Can we PLEASE let them secede? I think it is time to acknowledge that uniting the North and the South is a three hundred fifty year-old failed experiment. Next time any political leader in the South mentions that they want to secede, we should jump at the opportunity to untangle the country from the Red states. This country cannot have clean air, water and earth in many states, because Republicans. This country cannot have science in many states, because Republicans. This country cannot have rational, thoughtful, logical gun regulations, because Republicans. Women cannot exercise control over their own bodies in many states, because Republicans.
(The images attached to these quotations are manifestly and obviously not the same people who wrote the words. The Daily Caller shouldnt have to tell you that.)
Fascism/Communism -both Totalitarian
Expose International Bankers & Bilderbergers NWO agenda
To understand their agenda - Google: CFR,TC,Bilderberg
The PRIVATE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK must be exposed and abolished
*Council on foreign Relations CFR & Trilateral Commission TC Background & Quotes*
An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal attack" Richard Gardner ,
Ambassador to Italy - quoted in (CFR)Foreign Affairs, April, 1974
Actions at the multinational level will be needed, if the process of international relocation of industries is to be accelerated in an organized fashion
. TC Report #23, 1982
How our government has been controlled by the International Banksters
Since 1940, every U.S. secretary of state (except for Gov. James Byrnes of South Carolina, the sole exception) has been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and/or its younger brother, the Trilateral Commission. Also since 1940, every secretary of war and every secretary of defense has been a CFR member. During most of its existence, the Central Intelligence Agency has been headed by CFR members. Virtually every key U.S. national security and foreign policy adviser has been a CFR member for the past seventy years.
eagleye13 wrote:
Fascism/Communism -both Totalitarian
Expose International Bankers & Bilderbergers NWO agenda
To understand their agenda - Google: CFR,TC,Bilderberg
The PRIVATE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK must be exposed and abolished
*Council on foreign Relations CFR & Trilateral Commission TC Background & Quotes*
An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal attack" Richard Gardner ,
Ambassador to Italy - quoted in (CFR)Foreign Affairs, April, 1974
Actions at the multinational level will be needed, if the process of international relocation of industries is to be accelerated in an organized fashion
. TC Report #23, 1982
How our government has been controlled by the International Banksters
Since 1940, every U.S. secretary of state (except for Gov. James Byrnes of South Carolina, the sole exception) has been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and/or its younger brother, the Trilateral Commission. Also since 1940, every secretary of war and every secretary of defense has been a CFR member. During most of its existence, the Central Intelligence Agency has been headed by CFR members. Virtually every key U.S. national security and foreign policy adviser has been a CFR member for the past seventy years.
Fascism/Communism -both Totalitarian br Expose Int... (
show quote)
More Twilight Zone theme music please.
How about some "Jaws" music. The sharks are circling my little minnows. LOL
JMHO wrote:
Once again, you have it exactly ass backwards. Nice try, but that dog won't hunt...the voters just threw out the Dems because they want this country put back on the right track. It's the Dems that have destroyed this economy, education system, degraded our military capability, etc. and the voters just said enough. So, take a seat KHH1 and watch the Republicans put this country back on track.
**watch the President prove that he is smarter and can out-politic all of Congress....you'll be back to trying to repeal something else 50 times...what an embarrasment**
KHH1 wrote:
**watch the President prove that he is smarter and can out-politic all of Congress....you'll be back to trying to repeal something else 50 times...what an embarrasment**
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! Are you an amateur comedian by any chance?
Wanna buy a low mileage used car? Only driven by a little old lady to the local market and back.
It takes two to tango; and both parties have danced well together. Politicians laugh all the way to their bank accounts, and luxurious retirements. They had to sell their souls though. Such a deal.
JMHO wrote:
As Democratic losses mounted in Senate races across the country on election night, some liberal commentators clung to the idea that dissatisfied voters were sending a generally anti-incumbent message, and not specifically repudiating Democratic officeholders. But the facts of the election just don't support that story.
Voters replaced Democratic senators with Republicans in Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa, North Carolina, Montana, South Dakota, West Virginia and likely in Alaska, and appear on track to do so in a runoff next month in Louisiana. At the same time, voters kept Republicans in GOP seats in heavily contested races in Georgia, Kansas and Kentucky. That is at least 10, and as many as a dozen, tough races, without a single Republican seat changing hands. Tuesday's voting was a wave alright a very anti-Democratic wave.
In addition to demolishing the claim of bipartisan anti-incumbent sentiment, voters also exposed as myths five other ideas dear to the hearts of Democrats in the last few months:
1) The election wouldn't be a referendum on President Obama. "Barack Obama was on the ballot in 2012 and in 2008," Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said in late October. "The candidates that are on the ballot are Democratic and Republican candidates for Congress." Of course, that was true, but Republicans from New Hampshire to Alaska worked tirelessly to put the president figuratively on the ballot. And they succeeded.
Every day on the stump, Republican candidates pressed the point that their Democratic opponents voted for the Obama agenda nearly all the time. "Kay Hagan has voted for President Obama's failed partisan agenda 95 percent of the time," said Thom Tillis, who defeated the incumbent Democrat in North Carolina. Mark Pryor "votes with Barack Obama 93 percent of the time," said Tom Cotton, who defeated the incumbent Democrat in Arkansas. "Mark Udall has voted with [Obama] 99 percent of the time," said Cory Gardner, who defeated the incumbent Democrat in Colorado.
On Election Day, nearly 60 percent of voters told exit pollsters they were dissatisfied or angry with the Obama administration. In retrospect, there was no more effective campaign strategy for Republicans running in 2014 than to tie an opponent to the president.
2) Obamacare wouldn't matter. Many Democrats and their liberal supporters in the press believed that the president's healthcare plan, a year into implementation, would not be a major factor in the midterms. But Republican candidates ignored the liberal pundits and pounded away on Obamacare anyway and it contributed to their success.
"In our polling, [Obamacare] continues to be just as hot as it's been all year long," said a source in the campaign of Tom Cotton, who won a Senate seat handily in Arkansas, in an interview about ten days before the election. "If you look at a word cloud of voters' biggest hesitation in voting for Mark Pryor, the two biggest words are 'Obama' and 'Obamacare.' Everything after that is almost an afterthought." Other winning GOP candidates pushed hard on Obamacare, too. Tillis in North Carolina, Gardner in Colorado, Joni Ernst in Iowa, and several others made opposition to Obamacare a central part of their campaigns.
3) An improving economy would limit Democrats' losses. In the few places he felt confident and welcome enough to campaign, Obama devoted much of his appeal to citing the economic progress his administration has made: jobs created, growth, healthcare costs, corporate regulation.
The election results were pretty definitive proof that voters are not feeling the progress Obama feels has been made. Most importantly, it is an unhappy fact that a significant part of the decline in the unemployment rate under Obama has been the result of discouraged workers giving up the search for employment altogether. Indeed, in exit polls, nearly 70 percent of voters expressed negative feelings about the economy, many years into the Obama recovery.
4) Women would save Democrats. There were times when the midterm Senate campaigns seemed entirely devoted to seeking the approval of women voters. The Udall campaign in Colorado was almost a parody of such an appeal to women, focusing so extensively on contraception and abortion that the Denver Post called it an "obnoxious one-issue campaign."
Beyond Udall, most Democrats hoped a gender gap would boost them to victory. As it turned out, there was a gender gap in Tuesday's voting, but it favored Republicans. Exit polls showed that Democrats won women by seven points, while Republicans won men by 13 points. The numbers are definitive proof that, contrary to much conventional wisdom, Democrats have a bigger gender gap problem than the GOP. The elections showed precisely the opposite of what Democrats hoped they would.
5) The ground game would power Democrats to victory. When all else failed and all else seemed to fail in the campaign's final days Democrats believed that a superior ability to get voters to the polls would be their margin of victory, or at the very least would limit Democratic losses. After all, the Obama campaigns of 2008 and 2012 had run rings around Republicans in voter contact and get-out-the-vote technology.
It didn't turn out that way. Republicans had upped their game; the party invested millions in an improved turnout machine, and it appears to have passed its first test. At the same time, Democrats failed to conjure that 2008 and 2012 turnout magic in 2014. "The Obama coalition that propelled the president to two victories remained cohesive, drawing on minorities, younger voters as well as women," the Wall Street Journal reported. "But Democratic efforts to boost turnout among younger and minority voters fell short."
Perhaps most importantly, Democrats learned that a solid turnout effort could not overcome the drag of Obama, Obamacare, the economy, and a generalized unhappiness with the state of the country under the Obama administration.
In the end, Tuesday's vote represented a repudiation of virtually every notion Democrats embraced in recent weeks as they tried to disregard the growing evidence that they were headed for a historic defeat. Now, the vote is in, and the voters' message can no longer be discounted.
Byron York
As Democratic losses mounted in Senate races acros... (
show quote)
Voters' verdict explodes Democratic myths
Deja Vu?
dé·jà vu ˌdā-ˌzhä-ˈvü -ˈvᵫ
1
a
: the illusion of remembering scenes and events when experienced for the first time
b
: a feeling that one has seen or heard something before
Despite a blond, swept-back mane all his own, Fonda looks startlingly like his father, Henry … . He even moves like his father, only dispelling the eerie feeling of déjà vu when he opens his mouth.
—Peter Biskind
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.