One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
How sick can Abortion get?
Page <<first <prev 8 of 10 next> last>>
Nov 3, 2014 11:41:04   #
bahmer
 
Tasine wrote:
I can answer that question for you. The mother has ONE BODY: the one she was born with. She can do with it what she chooses. She can choose to use it wisely or she can choose to use it unwisely. IF she does not want to become pregnant, she can prevent pregnancy in various ways. But if she chooses to spread her legs for any man, she has made her choice, that choice to RISK pregnancy. The unintended consequence is HER FAULT. The baby's body belongs to NO ONE but the baby and its Creator. The mother does not own the baby's body and it isn't hers to kill. Abortion, PARTICULARLY LATE TERM ABORTION, IS MURDER, LEGALIZED BY A PROGRESSIVE LEGAL PROFESSION THAT HAS NO SOUL AND IS EVIL TO THE CORE. And will one day answer for its craven souls. I hope I am allowed to see the retribution.
I can answer that question for you. The mother ha... (show quote)


The DNA of the baby is different than the mothers DNA and thus the baby is not part of the mothers body but a separate and different body of its own. While the mother is the host for the baby it is not part of the mothers body. I would like to think with all of the preventive medicine for not conceiving children abortion would be an obsolete procedure. There are condoms, prescription birth control pills, intrauterine devices for the female, having ones tubes tied, and vasectomies for the men. Why then with all of the preventive ways available to humans are we still aborting our babies is beyond me.

Reply
Nov 3, 2014 13:09:36   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
bahmer wrote:
The DNA of the baby is different than the mothers DNA and thus the baby is not part of the mothers body but a separate and different body of its own. While the mother is the host for the baby it is not part of the mothers body. I would like to think with all of the preventive medicine for not conceiving children abortion would be an obsolete procedure. There are condoms, prescription birth control pills, intrauterine devices for the female, having ones tubes tied, and vasectomies for the men. Why then with all of the preventive ways available to humans are we still aborting our babies is beyond me.
The DNA of the baby is different than the mothers ... (show quote)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
1. Wimpy and/or decadent congressmen
2. Wimpy and/or decadent judges
3. Leftist obsession with control and decadence
4. Population control
5. The very, VERY rare occasions for rape and incest caused pregnancies

Those are the only REAL reasons on the face of the earth for the "need" for abortions.

Reply
Nov 3, 2014 19:59:08   #
Babsan
 
Rufus wrote:
They are the party of pure selfishness. Take what you can take without working for it. Do what you want to do when you want to do it regardless of how it may affect others. Truth and morality do not count. If you are caught doing something wrong blame it on someone else.


You said it,that's the DEMONrats

Reply
 
 
Nov 4, 2014 01:38:19   #
PeterS
 
Tasine wrote:
I can answer that question for you. The mother has ONE BODY: the one she was born with. She can do with it what she chooses.


That's correct--hang on to that thought. And why is it you say you can "answer that question" and then as I read through you don't answer my question? Why is it conservatives have such trouble with a simple yes or no answer. Maybe you didn't understand the question: does my right to life supersede your right to control your body? Yes or no. Pretty simple.

Quote:
She can choose to use it wisely or she can choose to use it unwisely. IF she does not want to become pregnant, she can prevent pregnancy in various ways. But if she chooses to spread her legs for any man, she has made her choice, that choice to RISK pregnancy. The unintended consequence is HER FAULT.


So a childbirth is a punishment for being promiscuous? Good to know. What about being raped or incest. Is childbirth a punishment for that too?

Quote:
The baby's body belongs to NO ONE but the baby and its Creator. The mother does not own the baby's body and it isn't hers to kill. Abortion,


Actually it does belong to the mother, she is the creator, and if she chooses to terminate the pregnancy than that is her choice--also her right. It's her body and not even promiscuity means she relinquishes her right to control her body. And this brings us full circle to my question--even though others my depend on our bodies for their lives, does this mean we give up the right to control our bodies? I think we both know the answer is no.

The right to control our bodies lies at the heart of being free. In fact, freedom cannot exist without the right to control our bodies which begs the question: why are conservatives so determined to hand it over to government? Do you not understand that when giving government the right to determine what we do with our bodies you open a Pandora's box in which our rights can disappear? I know thinking isn't the strong suit of conservatives but cap lock doesn't mean anything to government. Do you think my question simply a hypothetical? Well like you said, progressives are evil and if you take away a women's right to control their bodies believe me, they will make the connection to take away everyone's right to control their bodies.

And not to change subject but maybe you can explain your (conservative) love for the unborn and your total indifference, and at times open hostility, to children thereafter? Single women, and especially teenage women, have a hard enough time supporting a child then you oppose offering welfare, food stamps, a living wage, health care, day care, work training, paying for higher education and on and on. If you are so enamored with an embryo why are you so determined to make sure that it has the lowest quality of life possible once it is born? Since you favor having the State force women to have children they don't want shouldn't the State then be responsible for the child's quality of life thereafter?

And an even greater question: can you answer any of this without the use of cap lock?

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 04:09:15   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
PeterS wrote:
Actually it does belong to the mother, she is the creator, and if she chooses to terminate the pregnancy than that is her choice--also her right. It's her body and not even promiscuity means she relinquishes her right to control her body. And this brings us full circle to my question--even though others my depend on our bodies for their lives, does this mean we give up the right to control our bodies? I think we both know the answer is no.

The right to control our bodies lies at the heart of being free. In fact, freedom cannot exist without the right to control our bodies which begs the question: why are conservatives so determined to hand it over to government? Do you not understand that when giving government the right to determine what we do with our bodies you open a Pandora's box in which our rights can disappear? I know thinking isn't the strong suit of conservatives but cap lock doesn't mean anything to government. Do you think my question simply a hypothetical? Well like you said, progressives are evil and if you take away a women's right to control their bodies believe me, they will make the connection to take away everyone's right to control their bodies.

And not to change subject but maybe you can explain your (conservative) love for the unborn and your total indifference, and at times open hostility, to children thereafter? Single women, and especially teenage women, have a hard enough time supporting a child then you oppose offering welfare, food stamps, a living wage, health care, day care, work training, paying for higher education and on and on. If you are so enamored with an embryo why are you so determined to make sure that it has the lowest quality of life possible once it is born? Since you favor having the State force women to have children they don't want shouldn't the State then be responsible for the child's quality of life thereafter?

And an even greater question: can you answer any of this without the use of cap lock?
Actually it does belong to the mother, she is the ... (show quote)

You'll have to make it without me, Pete. I won't waste time on idiots any more than necessary to maintain some sanity on this thread. The mother created the baby? The mother doesn't know how to create a loaf of bread, let alone a baby. You are a plantation resident too, I see. Totally brainwashed.

It seems you think you are God. You aren't! NEither are you compassionate, nor do you care one whit about anyone but yourself, and it SHOWS. You merely make noise and try to distract from intelligent conversation - and you are terrified that once again morality may be on the rise, and that is a horrible thing to you. If the world had NO PEOPLE LIKE YOU, there would be no need for insane asylums, prisons, rehab clinics, illegal drug use and suicides. Only lost and terminally lost people fall into those places because they don't know how to cope in the real world, and they'd prefer to die than to learn how to cope. You are one of them, and a detriment to decent society.

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 08:33:22   #
PeterS
 
Tasine wrote:
You'll have to make it without me, Pete. I won't waste time on idiots any more than necessary to maintain some sanity on this thread. The mother created the baby? The mother doesn't know how to create a loaf of bread, let alone a baby. You are a plantation resident too, I see. Totally brainwashed.

And yet she seemed to do it quite well didn't she. Quite a trick for someone who couldn't create a loaf of bread!

Quote:
It seems you think you are God. You aren't! NEither are you compassionate, nor do you care one whit about anyone but yourself, and it SHOWS.

Really? I'm not the one here who is ducking all the questions! What I've found is that when people can't answer a direct question it's because doing so would expose just how flimsy their position is. You started out by proclaiming "I can answer that!" and then you did everything in your power not to. You are a liar and a hypocrite and it SHOWS!

Quote:
You merely make noise and try to distract from intelligent conversation

God you are such a petty little twerp. Name a single "INTELLEGENT" (see, you aren't the only one who can use cap lock!) question you've asked? Caps lock doesn't display intelligent. The question at hand is the is whether we have a right to control our own bodies. It's a simple question and it goes to the heart of whether we are a free society or whether we are going to cede every part of our lives to government simply so we can fain a very false sense of morality...

Quote:
- and you are terrified that once again morality may be on the rise, and that is a horrible thing to you.

Why would morality be a horrible thing to me? You are just sitting there throwing out as much bull shit as you can just hoping something will stick. To sit there and plead for the life of the unborn and then take a big steaming dump on them once they squirt out the tube makes you an immoral not moral person! When hypocrisy becomes our morality we can then rest assured that immorality is our KING!

Quote:
If the world had NO PEOPLE LIKE YOU, there would be no need for insane asylums, prisons, rehab clinics, illegal drug use and suicides.

People like me? Don't you mean people like YOU! Again, I haven't ducked a single question and there isn't a single question that you haven't ducked! Do you honestly think that if you CAN'T answer the simplest of questions it negates our need for asylums, prisons, rehab clinics, illegal drug use and suicides? Hiding from the truth is why the preceding exists not why it doesn't need to. Doesn't any thought go into a single word before it exits your mouth?

Quote:
Only lost and terminally lost people fall into those places because they don't know how to cope in the real world, and they'd prefer to die than to learn how to cope. You are one of them, and a detriment to decent society.

How does being liars and a hypocrites lead us to being a moral society? Prior to RvWade a "good" girl went away for a "procedure" while whores and trollops died in back alleys with a cloths hangers stuffed up their cunts. Was that moral? The pretence of morality is not morality. To force a girl to have a baby she doesn't want and then turn your back on them once the child is born is not morality. And above all, to cede our rights to control our bodies to government purely so we can pretend to be moral is the most immoral thing we can do!

T. When you find some morality then you can lecture me on it. Until then, I suggest you look in the mirror and come to grips with the hypocrite you are...

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 08:37:06   #
Retired669
 
PeterS wrote:
How does being liars and a hypocrites lead us to being a moral society? Prior to RvWade a "good" girl went away for a "procedure" while whores and trollops died in back alleys with a cloths hangers stuffed up their cunts. Was that moral? The pretence of morality is not morality. To force a girl to have a baby she doesn't want and then turn your back on them once the child is born is not morality. And above all, to cede our rights to control our bodies to government purely so we can pretend to be moral is the most immoral thing we can do!

T. When you find some morality then you can lecture me on it. Until then, I suggest you look in the mirror and come to grips with the hypocrite you are...
How does being liars and a hypocrites lead us to b... (show quote)


Ouch!... :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Nov 4, 2014 09:22:54   #
imbobbyc Loc: Montana
 
Neal wrote:
FYI ahrens, the term 'human life' means: 'human and alive'. Many folks have been misled to believe that there is something sacred, or sacrosanct about human life. This is mere ignorance.

If you believe that anything human and alive is human life and is therefore sacred and must be preserved, you must also accept that an inflamed appendix (a bit of human life) must not be removed because this would be destruction of human life. Let the patient die of peritonitis . . .

What IS sacred is the life of a human being. What is a human being? Through human history, the definition for this term has run from zygote to puberty. In the absence of a generally accepted definition of: 'human being', your definition, and mine, are matters of belief - NOT FACT!

I BELIEVE - that an idiot who kills an inconvenient three-year-old should be hung. I BELIEVE that someone who would approve this act is a witless idiot. I BELIEVE that human life becomes human being at birth.

The antiabortion clique prattles on about 'human life' without ever stopping to seriously think about what they're saying. Without that generally accepted definition of 'human being,' all that prattle is the exposition of belief - NOT FACT!!

I BELIEVE that society would be far better off ignoring mere belief and attending to facts :!:
FYI ahrens, the term 'human life' means: 'human an... (show quote)



I believe that you have to spend some time in the womb in order to be birthed.

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 09:39:11   #
Babsan
 
A lot of SICK and perverted DEMONrats here

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 09:39:12   #
Babsan
 
A lot of SICK and perverted DEMONrats here

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 09:40:54   #
imbobbyc Loc: Montana
 
PeterS wrote:
I'm not responsible for my wifes quality of life, she is. A child isn't responsible for their quality of life but the mother is.


Is your mother still responsible for your quality of life?

Reply
 
 
Nov 4, 2014 10:27:43   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
imbobbyc wrote:
Is your mother still responsible for your quality of life?


If he had a mother, she'd have him in an institution where he belongs.

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 10:50:52   #
imbobbyc Loc: Montana
 
Tasine wrote:
If he had a mother, she'd have him in an institution where he belongs.


You got that right.

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 14:13:40   #
PeterS
 
bahmer wrote:
The DNA of the baby is different than the mothers DNA and thus the baby is not part of the mothers body but a separate and different body of its own.

So remove the baby, implant it up your ass, and the problem is solved--right!

Reply
Nov 4, 2014 14:15:32   #
LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
PeterS wrote:
So remove the baby, implant it up your ass, and the problem is solved--right!
You're really sick.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.