Our southern border.. Our southern border will NEVER be secure as long as we have an insatiable appetite for dope. And now with marijuana, the entry level drug, legal in many states...

texasace

Our southern border will NEVER be secure as long as we have an insatiable appetite for dope. And now with marijuana, the entry level drug, legal in many states, the hard drugs be in greater demand. The dealers... including politicians, past and present... will do anything to profit from this illegal activity. God help us!!

Grugore

texasace wrote:

Our southern border will NEVER be secure as long as we have an insatiable appetite for dope. And now with marijuana, the entry level drug, legal in many states, the hard drugs be in greater demand. The dealers... including politicians, past and present... will do anything to profit from this illegal activity. God help us!!

What border? We don't have no stinking border.

Loki Loc: Georgia

texasace wrote:

Our southern border will NEVER be secure as long as we have an insatiable appetite for dope. And now with marijuana, the entry level drug, legal in many states, the hard drugs be in greater demand. The dealers... including politicians, past and present... will do anything to profit from this illegal activity. God help us!!

No doubt you saw what happened to Border Patrol Agent Jesus Diaz, who was sentenced to 2 years for allegedly "manhandling" a cartel dope mule caught red-handed on US soil with about 50 pounds of product. After being cleared of wrongdoing, the US DOJ, Eric the Douchebag Holder, et, al, re-opened the case at the behest of the MEXICAN GOVERNMENT and convicted an agent with an outstanding record, based on perjured testimony of a convicted dope smuggler who was granted immunity. Talk about sending a message.

L.E. Liesner Loc: New Mexico

texasace wrote:

Our southern border will NEVER be secure as long as we have an insatiable appetite for dope. And now with marijuana, the entry level drug, legal in many states, the hard drugs be in greater demand. The dealers... including politicians, past and present... will do anything to profit from this illegal activity. God help us!!

You forgot the big banks that make money laundering this dirty money for the drug cartels.

texasace

L.E. Liesner wrote:

You forgot the big banks that make money laundering this dirty money for the drug cartels.

That's a very good point... Thanks.... :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

W8_4_It

I don't particularly care if someone does drugs in the privacy of their own home.

But they should be aware that every dime they spend on that poison bankrolls murderers, rapists, gangsters and the worst sort of scum on face of the earth.

Grugore

W8_4_It wrote:

I don't particularly care if someone does drugs in the privacy of their own home.

But they should be aware that every dime they spend on that poison bankrolls murderers, rapists, gangsters and the worst sort of scum on face of the earth.

This is why we need the death penalty for distribution of drugs. Even if it doesn't work as a deterrent, it will get rid of some really evil people. You can't sell drugs to children if you're dead.

Pulfnick Loc: Knoxville, TN

L.E. Liesner wrote:

You forgot the big banks that make money laundering this dirty money for the drug cartels.

Apparently you don't understand what is meant by money laundering. Those nasty "big banks" you hate aren't the problem. Here's an example so you might understand:

1. Government taxes workers and businesses. Now politicians have money to be laundered.
2. Politicians (possibly Democrats??)give large chunks of this money to companion organizations (labor unions, GM "rescue", paying demonstrators to demonstrate, etc) .
3. These organizations launder the money on behalf of the politicians by using much of it to make huge donations to the politicians who arranged for them to get taxpayer money, as well by getting out the vote for them, etc. This money has now been laundered, leaving no obvious link between the tax payers and the politicians who stole their money.
4. Go to 1.

Those evil big banks, big corporations, or whatever boogeyman, are not doing the laundering. The organizations are doing the laundering for the politicians.

Pulfnick Loc: Knoxville, TN

Pulfnick wrote:

Apparently you don't understand what is meant by m... (show quote)

dennisimoto Loc: Washington State (West)

texasace wrote:

Our southern border will NEVER be secure as long as we have an insatiable appetite for dope. And now with marijuana, the entry level drug, legal in many states, the hard drugs be in greater demand. The dealers... including politicians, past and present... will do anything to profit from this illegal activity. God help us!!

I'm afraid you are correct. No administration in memory has made a serious attempt to control the flow of people and the concomitant flow of drugs across the border.

texasace

dennisimoto wrote:

I'm afraid you are correct. No administration in memory has made a serious attempt to control the flow of people and the concomitant flow of drugs across the border.

I got this from an old Air Force buddy who shares my concern with the increased use of dope, and with the public apathy. This link is long... I watched in 4 or 5 sessions... but it is well worth every minute. I hope you enjoy and forward it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxmK3-r54yQ

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

dennisimoto wrote:

I'm afraid you are correct. No administration in memory has made a serious attempt to control the flow of people and the concomitant flow of drugs across the border.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

dennisimoto Loc: Washington State (West)

texasace wrote:

I got this from an old Air Force buddy who shares my concern with the increased use of dope, and with the public apathy. This link is long... I watched in 4 or 5 sessions... but it is well worth every minute. I hope you enjoy and forward it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxmK3-r54yQ

Ace, need to take the "s" off the http part for it to work. Don't know why but it seems to help. An hour and 52 minutes is definitely something I'll need to watch in "chunks." Thanks.

texasace

dennisimoto wrote:

Ace, need to take the "s" off the http part for it to work. Don't know why but it seems to help. An hour and 52 minutes is definitely something I'll need to watch in "chunks." Thanks.

Thanks for the tip... I'm glad it opened for you... there's a wealth of information there. I watched for a while... did some work, and came back for more later... like you say, in "chunks".

just care

The people south of the border keep coming and we let them in the name of diversity. This is the least diverse move possible, they should be sent home to allow people from the rest of the world to immigrate and allow for true diversity if that is the real goal. To allow them to stay would be a backward step toward diversity. It is simply favortism.and pandering