LIBERAL LIES (Page 2): More CINO's just name calling and no facts. What ever happened to WHO, WHERE, and WHEN ??

rastybob

More CINO's just name calling and no facts. What ever happened to WHO, WHERE, and WHEN ??

sandra1938

Tasine wrote:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How long did the left have to search to find someone who is willing to make himself look like a fool in a weak attempt to distract from the left's high crimes?

oh we got him from the rep. party because they said they had so many they just HAD TO GET RID OF A BUNCH!

sandra1938

Whatamess wrote:

Could you elaborate on the FRAUD you have seen? If it was voter fraud, then why is Barack Hussien Obama in office?

because the majority of the people voted for him? DUUUH! and it didn't have to be decided by a republican majority supreme court?

sandra1938

Dave wrote:

Someone writing such wide statements about anything based, at best, on their own empirical observations is either clearly not much of a thinker or is purposefully attempting to mislead the reader.

is that like a woman trying to explain to a man what pregnancy feels like and if you don't like what you hear that is from her empirical observations ? you are so smart, so superior you can call a man a liar that has literally decades of experience! do you even know what a wide statement is? apparently NOT because he was Very specific in saying he had first hand experience in observing republican lies.

sandra1938

Tasine wrote:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How long did the left have to search to find someone who is willing to make himself look like a fool in a weak attempt to distract from the left's high crimes?

i thought i posted this answer once but i don't see it so i'll keep posting it until i do. i said---- we GOT him from the republican party because they had such an over abundance of fools they had to get rid of some! are the left's high crimes better than the republican's LOW DOWN crimes?

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

I have to question Rich, whoever he is since he posted his post over 14 hours before the last post on this thread. Surely he is some kind of troll or he would have tried to answer what conservatives are saying. I also have to question his 49 years of taking part in campaigns since that wold make him over 70 years old.

I would say that it is past time for all on this thread, left and right, to back off and find Rich to answer some of the accusations of him. In fact, I demand something more from someone who posts in the very wee hours of the morning and then isn't heard from again. I question anything other than trying to stir up people from both sides.

faithistheword

Rich wrote:

I have worked on political campaigns on both sides... (show quote)

I, too, have worked on Republican campaigns, and what you say is not what I found! I found corner-cutting, weaseling, and financial shortcuts, but I never witnessed any
outright corruption. The regulations are very hard to follow, and are sometimes ambiguous, encouraging the "wink-winks". I know of one person, of questionable character, who works for the democratic campaign machine, and he just laughs when I ask him if they're on the up-and-up, so methinks you have an agenda.

weneedrubio

Do you have any facts at all to present? Ask your girlfriend if she knows any. The Dem party is about to elect McAuliffe in Virginia, are you kidding me? You elected Obama, the single most dishonest/corrupt president we've ever had and you call us names? Now you want Hillary because why again? She "stood by her man, I mean rapist, husband?" Do you have any principles other then abortion and gay rights? You have been listening to lies for so long you don't know what facts are.

sandra1938 wrote:

i thought i posted this answer once but i don't see it so i'll keep posting it until i do. i said---- we GOT him from the republican party because they had such an over abundance of fools they had to get rid of some! are the left's high crimes better than the republican's LOW DOWN crimes?

Whatamess Loc: SC

sandra1938 wrote:

because the majority of the people voted for him? DUUUH! and it didn't have to be decided by a republican majority supreme court?

What a laim answer to a very simply question...DUUUH!

sandra1938

Whatamess wrote:

What a laim answer to a very simply question...DUUUH!

you are right. it WAS a "simple" question. now ask an intellegent one!

weneedrubio

OK, tell me which policy the Dems have proposed that is working. I'll let you go back 100 years.

sandra1938 wrote:

you are right. it WAS a "simple" question. now ask an intellegent one!

Geno36 Loc: Texas

weneedrubio wrote:

OK, tell me which policy the Dems have proposed that is working. I'll let you go back 100 years.

They are all working. Just ask the millions on the dole. Like 47 million on food stamps and all the rest ad nausium.

weneedrubio

Well, I guess that's one way to look at it.

Geno36 wrote:

They are all working. Just ask the millions on the dole. Like 47 million on food stamps and all the rest ad nausium.

sandra1938

faithistheword wrote:

I, too, have worked on Republican campaigns, and what you say is not what I found! I found corner-cutting, weaseling, and financial shortcuts, but I never witnessed any
outright corruption. The regulations are very hard to follow, and are sometimes ambiguous, encouraging the "wink-winks". I know of one person, of questionable character, who works for the democratic campaign machine, and he just laughs when I ask him if they're on the up-and-up, so methinks you have an agenda.

ifcorner-cutting, weaseling, and financial short cuts are not coruption then i guess a woman really can be a " little bit" pregnant

handy Loc: so cal

I know that is baloney, here in so. calif there are so many politicians in prison or under investigation for kickbacks etc and 90% of them are democrats, look at Detroit, Cleveland, and Chicago to name just a few. They are your fellow travelers of atheism, social justice and the just plain ignorant and greedy. To be fair their are very few in politics that I could say I would trust to do what is right for America and not be corrupted by power and money.