No! No! No! Romney lost the presidency to the two worst candidates in the history of the world, and now some geniuses in the Republican Party think he is the candidate to run in 2016.

carolyn

Romney lost the presidency to the two worst candidates in the history of the world, and now some geniuses in the Republican Party think he is the candidate to run in 2016.

They really must want Elizabeth Warren or Hillary Clinton to be president.

preservefreedom.org/no-evidence-required-to-get-on-Obama...

mcjwelles

NONONONONO is the tantrum mantra- nothing more. Go to your room.

carolyn wrote:

Romney lost the presidency to the two worst candidates in the history of the world, and now some geniuses in the Republican Party think he is the candidate to run in 2016.

They really must want Elizabeth Warren or Hillary Clinton to be president.

preservefreedom.org/no-evidence-required-to-get-on-Obama...

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

carolyn wrote:

Romney lost the presidency to the two worst candidates in the history of the world, and now some geniuses in the Republican Party think he is the candidate to run in 2016.

They really must want Elizabeth Warren or Hillary Clinton to be president.

preservefreedom.org/no-evidence-required-to-get-on-Obama...

If the American electorate is dumb enough to elect either Hillary or Warren, there is no GOP candidate able to correct such a deep seated self destructive cancer in the American people. Remember, the Obama fiasco is the fault of the American people - twice they gave power to a person who clearly was not capable on any level to wield it with discretion, judgment or courage.

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

carolyn wrote:

Romney lost the presidency to the two worst candidates in the history of the world, and now some geniuses in the Republican Party think he is the candidate to run in 2016.

They really must want Elizabeth Warren or Hillary Clinton to be president.

preservefreedom.org/no-evidence-required-to-get-on-Obama...

Only a fool would ask Romney to run or even thing he has a chance. If the Republicans don't run an acceptable candidate either Warren or Clinton will be president. both are full socialists and the only difference between either of them and Obama is their genitals (I think)

mcjwelles

Interesting there are no statesmen attracted to the GOP currently- could their incoherent ideology have anything to do with that? Our country NEEDS a Conservative voice back. Dems shouldn't have to carry the GOP side of the political conversation too! Remember the "Obama Fiasco" is solely the product of that same GOP misinformed idiocy described as 'ideology'. You better get busy- 2016 is just around the corner and Obama is not a one term president.

Dave wrote:

If the American electorate is dumb enough to elect either Hillary or Warren, there is no GOP candidate able to correct such a deep seated self destructive cancer in the American people. Remember, the Obama fiasco is the fault of the American people - twice they gave power to a person who clearly was not capable on any level to wield it with discretion, judgment or courage.

mcjwelles

Define Socialism. One thing it isn't is government control of business. Look it up, at least, in your dictionary of choice. Only a fool would call this administration 'Socialist'. Now you Could make a case for calling current GOP policy 'ANTIsocial"...

no propaganda please wrote:

Only a fool would ask Romney to run or even thing he has a chance. If the Republicans don't run an acceptable candidate either Warren or Clinton will be president. both are full socialists and the only difference between either of them and Obama is their genitals (I think)

MrEd Loc: Georgia

carolyn wrote:

Romney lost the presidency to the two worst candidates in the history of the world, and now some geniuses in the Republican Party think he is the candidate to run in 2016.

They really must want Elizabeth Warren or Hillary Clinton to be president.

preservefreedom.org/no-evidence-required-to-get-on-Obama...

Romney didn't loose the election, it was stolen by Obama and his voter fraud. Look for Hilary to do the same thing. If they were not planning to use voter fraud again, then why are they so worried about voter ID's?? If they are truly against voter ID's, then why are they not fighting them in all the states, instead of just a few.

carolyn

mcjwelles wrote:

NONONONONO is the tantrum mantra- nothing more. Go to your room.

So evidently you must believe that two wrongs might make a right, eh? Are you one of the one's that thought Romney did the right thing by showing Obama he was a goody-good guy by not bringing up his failures in their debates? Or are you simply a Democrat who realizes that if Romney is once again run on the Republican ticket it will assure another Democrat victory. There is too many good candidates that want to run to again run a failure as they did last time. The RINO'S must want to lose to the left-wing Socialists.

mcjwelles

Any coherent citations on Obama and voter fraud? The GOP has hash marks up and down their backsides that are pretty high visibility- including the SCOTUS appointing a president, up-front gerrymandering, disenfranchisement of minority and poor voters- and they continue with their ID crap even as we speak. You don't have a leg to stand on as far as I know.

MrEd wrote:

Romney didn't loose the election, it was stolen by Obama and his voter fraud. Look for Hilary to do the same thing. If they were not planning to use voter fraud again, then why are they so worried about voter ID's?? If they are truly against voter ID's, then why are they not fighting them in all the states, instead of just a few.

mcjwelles

We are in disagreement from A to Z on this subject.

carolyn wrote:

So evidently you must believe that two wrongs migh... (show quote)

carolyn

mcjwelles wrote:

Define Socialism. One thing it isn't is government control of business. Look it up, at least, in your dictionary of choice. Only a fool would call this administration 'Socialist'. Now you Could make a case for calling current GOP policy 'ANTIsocial"...

You either definitely do not know the definition of Socialism or you are one of the dumbest posters on this website. The definition of Socialism is... Ownership of exploitable capital and means of production by the government, not by individuals or by private enterprise.

So now you left-wing bull shitter, go back and talk your stupid shit to the other brainwashed idiots. It might make you feel better to hear agreement from the rest of the dum-dums.

Nickolai

mcjwelles wrote:

Interesting there are no statesmen attracted to the GOP currently- could their incoherent ideology have anything to do with that? Our country NEEDS a Conservative voice back. Dems shouldn't have to carry the GOP side of the political conversation too! Remember the "Obama Fiasco" is solely the product of that same GOP misinformed idiocy described as 'ideology'. You better get busy- 2016 is just around the corner and Obama is not a one term president.

We've had conservatives f****** things up for 12 years of Raygun Bush. 8 years of Clinton. 8 years of Bush 43. That's 28 of the last 34 years and I cant take it anymore The country desperately needs to get back on a progressive path we jumped the rails 40 years ago

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

no propaganda please wrote:

Only a fool would ask Romney to run or even thing he has a chance. If the Republicans don't run an acceptable candidate either Warren or Clinton will be president. both are full socialists and the only difference between either of them and Obama is their genitals (I think)

Nope just the haircut.

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

Nickolai wrote:

We've had conservatives f****** things up for 12 years of Raygun Bush. 8 years of Clinton. 8 years of Bush 43. That's 28 of the last 34 years and I cant take it anymore The country desperately needs to get back on a progressive path we jumped the rails 40 years ago

Hey how is Stewart doing? Honeymoon over...shame.

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

mcjwelles wrote:

Any coherent citations on Obama and voter fraud? The GOP has hash marks up and down their backsides that are pretty high visibility- including the SCOTUS appointing a president, up-front gerrymandering, disenfranchisement of minority and poor voters- and they continue with their ID crap even as we speak. You don't have a leg to stand on as far as I know.

Thousands of examples of dead and voters past the total population of regeistered voters having voted.....clear evidence for anyone to look at, except those that deny and hide from the truth....as most DEMOCRAPS do....