Republicans prevent Ebola vaccine (Page 2): Of course there was no budget cut, just less of an increase than the "progressives" wanted. That is the claim from either side and a new use...

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

funguy1949 wrote:

Look at the rag your reading it sickens me for every thing that goes wrong your pointing fingers at the republicans, You know something ass wipe liberal or is that libertards your lieing out of your Ahole why do I say that for every time your libertard lips move your lieing.

Of course there was no budget cut, just less of an increase than the "progressives" wanted. That is the claim from either side and a new use of the English language, when a smaller increase than requested is called a cut.

BearK Loc: TN

Snoopy wrote:

T

Marvin

Where does the doctor say Republicans held up funding?

Who, in the Senate, controls which bills will presented for a vote?

Harry Reid, of course.

I think you managed shoot yourself in the foot again.

Snoopy

Thanks, Snoopy. I just posted an article on Obama's indifference to Ebola coming to America.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Constitutional libertarian wrote:

Marvin your full of BS, I read in Time that the gov doesn't have a $100,000,000 or so to spend getting new products through the FDA process. Is it the lack of money or an FDA that is out of wack. If you want the new experimental Ebola one you can request it, but the average wait time for a approval is 21 days.

Sorry dude by that point all any of us can say is rest in peace.

And no pharm company will spend that on a desease that only effects a hand full of people every year.

Marv has it in his head that the road to prosperity is paved by government spending. If bombs and tanks don't do the job, the infrastructure will, if that doesn't work maybe experimental medicines. :lol:

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

BearK wrote:

Thanks, Snoopy. I just posted an article on Obama's indifference to Ebola coming to America.

It is a very good article. hope many will read it and think about what Sowell says.

ed4short Loc: New Hampshire

Huffington Post is all for Democrats anyway, and is quite one sided in reporting the facts

Viet Nam Vet 67-68

lindajoy wrote:

Rag or not the issue is "budget cuts over the last decade"and whom is it that controls spending and vetos everything they don't want passed???

Simply don't believe, get the real facts NIH is worthless and needs to be defunded and let our system work called Capitalism not Communism. Your head Imam obamination is responsible for this outbreak in America at least France and Britain were smart enough to stop flights from African Nations and we should have too.

CharlesRabb

Snoopy wrote:

T

Marvin

Where does the doctor say Republicans held up funding?

Who, in the Senate, controls which bills will presented for a vote?

Harry Reid, of course.

I think you managed shoot yourself in the foot again.

Snoopy

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

MajorAhrens Loc: Myrtle Beach

Sir or ma'am, at the time you mention I was up to my a$$ dodging IED's and suicide bombers. I would of loved to been home with my family but duty called. You know Obama could of called them back into session when he wanted. He had a window to pass ANYTHING he wanted. But couldn't stay off the golf course. He's pure slime in my opinion. Thank you.

MarvinSussman

lindajoy wrote:

Rag or not the issue is "budget cuts over the last decade"and whom is it that controls spending and vetos everything they don't want passed???

In the 2006 Congress, the filibuster cut spending and Bush had veto power over spending for NIH.
In the 2008 Congress, the stimulus gave a lot to NIH.
In the 2010 &2012 House, the NIH got shrunk so it could be drowned in a bathtub.

MarvinSussman

MajorAhrens wrote:

Seems to me the "thrill up my leg liberal/com... (show quote)

In the 2006 Congress, the filibuster cut spending and Bush had veto power over spending for NIH.
In the 2008 Congress, the stimulus gave a lot to NIH.
In the 2010 &2012 House, the NIH got shrunk so it could be drowned in a bathtub.

MarvinSussman

Snoopy wrote:

T

Marvin

Where does the doctor say Republicans held up funding?

Who, in the Senate, controls which bills will presented for a vote?

Harry Reid, of course.

I think you managed shoot yourself in the foot again.

Snoopy

In the 2006 Congress, the filibuster cut spending and Bush had veto power over spending for NIH.
In the 2008 Congress, the stimulus gave a lot to NIH.
In the 2010 &2012 House, the NIH got shrunk so it could be drowned in a bathtub.

MarvinSussman

BigMike wrote:

Isn't the development of new medicines what drug companies do?

The Republicans are to blame for ebola! :lol:

NIH does the research. The drug companies get the profit. The IRS tries to get the tax that the accountants hide.

MarvinSussman

ginnyt wrote:

Gee, I was sure that I read an article about TKM ... (show quote)

Just like the DOD has almost all the guns in the world, the NIH is where the research is done. Good old USA!

MarvinSussman

MajorAhrens wrote:

Spot on Snoopy. 'Ol Starvin Marvin left out the part about dingy Harry not letting anything get a vote. Libs can't be bothered with FACTS.

In the 2006 Congress, the filibuster cut spending and Bush had veto power over spending for NIH.
In the 2008 Congress, the stimulus gave a lot to NIH.
In the 2010 &2012 House, the NIH got shrunk so it could be drowned in a bathtub.

MarvinSussman

MajorAhrens wrote:

Spot on Snoopy. 'Ol Starvin Marvin left out the part about dingy Harry not letting anything get a vote. Libs can't be bothered with FACTS.

In the 2006 Congress, the filibuster cut spending and Bush had veto power over spending for NIH.
In the 2008 Congress, the stimulus gave a lot to NIH.
In the 2010 &2012 House, the NIH got shrunk so it could be drowned in a bathtub.