Opal, respectively submitted I would suggest the Woman's Movement was far more than outlined..It was for equal rights, period..In that cause Woman looked to achieve the same basic rights of men in their career paths, less discrimination and a means to be better and more productive... Initially, women reformers addressed social and institutional barriers that limited women’s rights; including family responsibilities, a lack of educational and economic opportunities, and the absence of a voice in political debates..It grew and became much more over the years until it finally concentrated its efforts on equal pay and respect etc..

Those woman in the pictures you refer to are excising their right to be both, feminine, attractive, and sexy, while not compromising their right or need to hide that part of them...Something else we struggled to attain...I guess its all in how you look at it..Maybe they do have children and the "job" paid them well, so they could take care of those children without having to burden society with their responsibility to do so....??...The movement was to make it possible for we, women, to better provide for and take care of family, not to burden society with our responsibility..It was to enable us to have the means without discrimination etc..

I find nothing offensive abut them..Heck we see far less every day on the beach, and no one criticizes the right to express oneself in their choice of bathing suits there..
Sexuality is in itself a beautiful expression of both men and women and is also what draws and attracts..I don't think we need to walk around covered to our necks and down to our feet just to be morally accepted..Contrarily I look at a women whom is able to accentuate her features and isn't afraid to show it, as confident, a self starter and content with whom she is...Isn't that what we all want??

__________________________________________________________

Nickolai must have been living in a vacuum somewhere. He posted: "There hasn't been one military personnel that lost their life on American soil protecting anybody's rights since 1814."

Nidal Hasan, a U.S. traitor, was sentenced to death in 2013 for killing 13 soldiers at Fort Hood and wounding 30 in a shooting rampage at the Fort Hood military base in 2009, in TEXAS. The military in Fort Hood got their final check-ups there BEFORE BEING DEPLOYED TO AFGHANISTAN, where, Nickolai should note, they were protecting the rights of America and her citizens. Obama, of course, had the unmitigated, unconscionable, incredibly dispassionate temerity to call Hasan's cowardly assault "workplace violence," but he also called the War On Terror, "Kinetic Military Acton" - so both those euphemisms can just be added to the lengthy litany of lies we've been subjected to for the last 6-1/2 years.

__________________________________________________________

Nickolai must have been living in a vacuum somewhere. He posted: "There hasn't been one military personnel that lost their life on American soil protecting anybody's rights since 1814."

Nidal Hasan, a U.S. traitor, was sentenced to death in 2013 for killing 13 soldiers at Fort Hood and wounding 30 in a shooting rampage at the Fort Hood military base in 2009, in TEXAS. The military in Fort Hood got their final check-ups there BEFORE BEING DEPLOYED TO AFGHANISTAN, where, Nickolai should note, they were protecting the rights of America and her citizens. Obama, of course, had the unmitigated, unconscionable, incredibly dispassionate temerity to call Hasan's cowardly assault "workplace violence," but he also called the War On Terror, "Kinetic Military Acton" - so both those euphemisms can just be added to the lengthy litany of lies we've been subjected to for the last 6-1/2 years.