How repubs can win 2016: If the repubs will take a page from Clinton's playbook they can win in 2016 if the current massive elections frauds can be cut back. Clinton won in 1992 and...

hprinze Loc: Central Florida

If the repubs will take a page from Clinton's playbook they can win in 2016 if the current massive elections frauds can be cut back.

Clinton won in 1992 and 1996 by dividing and conquering. In cahoots with Ross Perot he created a party that would take huge numbers of votes away from the repubs.

Take a scenario of Hillary being the dem candidate. A third party, preferably with a negro candidate, promising everything the libs, the unions, the negros, the welfare bums, the illegals want could take large numbers of voters away from Hillary. They would not go to the repubs, but they woild cut the dems to a minority.

Anyone who can't see that Clinton and Perot were in cahoots must have been afflicted with a huge dose of naivette.

It worked for Clinton who won iin 92 with 43% of the popular vote. If properly done it would work for the repubs.

katz Loc: washington

hprinze wrote:

If the repubs will take a page from Clinton's play... (show quote)

negro, that word is still around :thumbdown:

traceyanne Loc: Akron Ohio

I believe they prefer and are professionally referred to as "African Americans" if you insist on seperating them into a people group for election purposes. Using the terminolog you did to refer to people based on those terms will surely result in yet another mark in the loss column for the 2016 presid. Cool it on the name calling and you may be on your way to win. :wink: :-o :shock: :-o :-o

hprinze Loc: Central Florida

traceyanne wrote:

I believe they prefer and are professionally referred to as "African Americans" if you insist on seperating them into a people group for election purposes. Using the terminolog you did to refer to people based on those terms will surely result in yet another mark in the loss column for the 2016 presid. Cool it on the name calling and you may be on your way to win. :wink: :-o :shock: :-o :-o

Your yuppie style ignorance is showing

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

traceyanne wrote:

I believe they prefer and are professionally referred to as "African Americans" if you insist on seperating them into a people group for election purposes. Using the terminolog you did to refer to people based on those terms will surely result in yet another mark in the loss column for the 2016 presid. Cool it on the name calling and you may be on your way to win. :wink: :-o :shock: :-o :-o

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

traceyanne wrote:

I believe they prefer and are professionally referred to as "African Americans" if you insist on seperating them into a people group for election purposes. Using the terminolog you did to refer to people based on those terms will surely result in yet another mark in the loss column for the 2016 presid. Cool it on the name calling and you may be on your way to win. :wink: :-o :shock: :-o :-o

so which are they African or American they can't be both

katz Loc: washington

alex wrote:

so which are they African or American they can't be both

I'm white American, how about black Americn.

justkillingtime

You are assuming an awful lot.

First of all without his own money Ross Perot likely would not have been on the ballot in every state.

Second, Perot took the votes of people who were fed up with both parties.

And third, I note that your plan for Election Day victory is to attack the Democrats rather than proposing policies that a majority of the American People can support. Partisans like you are part of this countrys problems, not part of our problems solutions.

justkillingtime

Ich bin Iceni.

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

katz wrote:

I'm white American, how about black Americn.

that works for me that's what most people from other countries call them

katz Loc: washington

hprinze wrote:

Your yuppie style ignorance is showing

What are you referencing.

cold iron Loc: White House

hprinze wrote:

If the repubs will take a page from Clinton's play... (show quote)

Great idea, but can the GOP think?
Negro is in every dictionary, it's a real word.

tato Loc: San Diego

hprinze wrote:

If the repubs will take a page from Clinton's play... (show quote)

How about the Repubs not making enemies out of everybody except for a dying out demographic, and come up with some policies that people can get a hand on. Just being opposed to everything this administration does won't cut it.

Of course this won't happen. The teapartiers and the "moderate" GOP are never going to get their act together. The tea party faction is out to destroy the country, the rest of the Repubs are afraid, very afraid. The Repubs nominate candidates so far to the right that flawed Democrats win easily.

Romney tacked too far to the right, and it destroyed his candidacy. By nature rather moderate, he faked his right wing attitude; people looked at him as a phony, one could feel the lack of authenticity, the feeling he was "real". Along with his lack of warmth and stiffness, he was doomed.

Using the term "negro" is no more that a substitute for the "n" word; you don't fool anyone.

katz Loc: washington

alex wrote:

that works for me that's what most people from other countries call them

How about just American, leave color out of it :D

cold iron Loc: White House

tato wrote:

How about the Repubs not making enemies out of eve... (show quote)

You left wingers go through words like underwear. When you ware them out you get a new one. Soon "black" will offensives to you and then a new name will come along. sic