If you can disprove evolution.
PeterS wrote:
So...still waiting!
Not much longer...wink wink.
PeterS wrote:
So...still waiting!
The purpose of this thread is what?
AuH20 wrote:
The purpose of this thread is what?
To encourage you to collect your Nobel prize and put an end to the notion of evolution forever.
PeterS wrote:
To collect your Nobel prize and put an end to the notion of evolution forever.
So, basically, no reason except to start a thread.
AuH20 wrote:
So, basically, no reason except to start a thread.
So are you telling me you don't want your Nobel prize or you have no proof that evolution doesn't exist? If either of the case then it's you who has no reason to be on this thread.
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
AuH20 wrote:
The purpose of this thread is what?
As you are new, let me explain.
Peters is an atheist and consumed by hatred of anything related to religion. He tosses up these types of threads weekly.
AuntiE wrote:
As you are new, let me explain.
Peters is an atheist and consumed by hatred of anything related to religion. He tosses up these types of threads weekly.
So , you were saying ,
What was the purpose of the thread !????
PeterS wrote:
So...still waiting!
Because the liberal Nobel prize committee would never accept the truth.
AuH20 wrote:
The purpose of this thread is what?
PeterS is forever throwing down the gauntlet for anyone to punch a hole in the Neo Darwinian Theory of Evolution.
The world of science has supported this theory for decades, but of late there have been some prominent scientists who have defected from the ranks of Darwin believers. Others have actually kept their defection quiet, but their work actually leads to making ND an anachronism in the annals of science. Significant support has been given by many to seek a new formulation that accounts for the significant disparities of ND they recognize. One main disparity is for ND to account for how the information needed to create a living animal comes about without any precursor types from which to evolve.
The same question arises when decoding DNA: where did the info come from that encoded the DNA to begin with?
The latest trilogy of scientists, Stephen Meyer, Michael Behe, and John Lennox of Intelligent Design advocacy have mounted substantive arguments recently on You Tube that need to be answered to the effect that God exists, and He is the Creator of all things...and is not a "God of the Gaps". In effect the Christian view of God. Still, we have not seen a physical proof of the existence of God, so each side of the argument stands their ground.
manning5me wrote:
PeterS is forever throwing down the gauntlet for anyone to punch a hole in the Neo Darwinian Theory of Evolution.
The world of science has supported this theory for decades, but of late there have been some prominent scientists who have defected from the ranks of Darwin believers. Others have actually kept their defection quiet, but their work actually leads to making ND an anachronism in the annals of science. Significant support has been given by many to seek a new formulation that accounts for the significant disparities of ND they recognize. One main disparity is for ND to account for how the information needed to create a living animal comes about without any precursor types from which to evolve.
The same question arises when decoding DNA: where did the info come from that encoded the DNA to begin with?
The latest trilogy of scientists, Stephen Meyer, Michael Behe, and John Lennox of Intelligent Design advocacy have mounted substantive arguments recently on You Tube that need to be answered to the effect that God exists, and He is the Creator of all things...and is not a "God of the Gaps". In effect the Christian view of God. Still, we have not seen a physical proof of the existence of God, so each side of the argument stands their ground.
PeterS is forever throwing down the gauntlet for a... (
show quote)
Perhaps those of faith should simply stand on 2 Corinthians and simply ignore atheists.
2 Corinthians 5:7 - King James Version
7. For we walk by faith, not by sight:
AuH20 wrote:
Has no value.
The thread or millstone? Oh ya, both.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.