One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out topic: The debate
Main
If you can disprove evolution.
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 1, 2024 19:24:09   #
PeterS
 
So...still waiting!



Reply
May 1, 2024 19:25:58   #
liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house
 
PeterS wrote:
So...still waiting!




Not much longer...wink wink.

Reply
May 1, 2024 19:40:59   #
AuH20
 
PeterS wrote:
So...still waiting!


The purpose of this thread is what?

Reply
May 1, 2024 19:45:02   #
liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house
 
AuH20 wrote:
The purpose of this thread is what?



Just to be a douche'

Reply
May 1, 2024 19:53:34   #
PeterS
 
AuH20 wrote:
The purpose of this thread is what?

To encourage you to collect your Nobel prize and put an end to the notion of evolution forever.

Reply
May 1, 2024 19:55:40   #
AuH20
 
PeterS wrote:
To collect your Nobel prize and put an end to the notion of evolution forever.


So, basically, no reason except to start a thread.

Reply
May 1, 2024 20:00:01   #
PeterS
 
AuH20 wrote:
So, basically, no reason except to start a thread.

So are you telling me you don't want your Nobel prize or you have no proof that evolution doesn't exist? If either of the case then it's you who has no reason to be on this thread.

Reply
May 1, 2024 20:04:36   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
AuH20 wrote:
The purpose of this thread is what?


As you are new, let me explain.

Peters is an atheist and consumed by hatred of anything related to religion. He tosses up these types of threads weekly.

Reply
May 1, 2024 20:11:24   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
AuntiE wrote:
As you are new, let me explain.

Peters is an atheist and consumed by hatred of anything related to religion. He tosses up these types of threads weekly.


So , you were saying ,
What was the purpose of the thread !????

Reply
May 1, 2024 20:22:03   #
Liberty Tree
 
PeterS wrote:
So...still waiting!


Because the liberal Nobel prize committee would never accept the truth.

Reply
May 1, 2024 20:22:54   #
manning5me Loc: Richmond, Va.
 
AuH20 wrote:
The purpose of this thread is what?


PeterS is forever throwing down the gauntlet for anyone to punch a hole in the Neo Darwinian Theory of Evolution.
The world of science has supported this theory for decades, but of late there have been some prominent scientists who have defected from the ranks of Darwin believers. Others have actually kept their defection quiet, but their work actually leads to making ND an anachronism in the annals of science. Significant support has been given by many to seek a new formulation that accounts for the significant disparities of ND they recognize. One main disparity is for ND to account for how the information needed to create a living animal comes about without any precursor types from which to evolve.
The same question arises when decoding DNA: where did the info come from that encoded the DNA to begin with?
The latest trilogy of scientists, Stephen Meyer, Michael Behe, and John Lennox of Intelligent Design advocacy have mounted substantive arguments recently on You Tube that need to be answered to the effect that God exists, and He is the Creator of all things...and is not a "God of the Gaps". In effect the Christian view of God. Still, we have not seen a physical proof of the existence of God, so each side of the argument stands their ground.

Reply
 
 
May 1, 2024 20:40:51   #
AuH20
 
manning5me wrote:
PeterS is forever throwing down the gauntlet for anyone to punch a hole in the Neo Darwinian Theory of Evolution.
The world of science has supported this theory for decades, but of late there have been some prominent scientists who have defected from the ranks of Darwin believers. Others have actually kept their defection quiet, but their work actually leads to making ND an anachronism in the annals of science. Significant support has been given by many to seek a new formulation that accounts for the significant disparities of ND they recognize. One main disparity is for ND to account for how the information needed to create a living animal comes about without any precursor types from which to evolve.
The same question arises when decoding DNA: where did the info come from that encoded the DNA to begin with?
The latest trilogy of scientists, Stephen Meyer, Michael Behe, and John Lennox of Intelligent Design advocacy have mounted substantive arguments recently on You Tube that need to be answered to the effect that God exists, and He is the Creator of all things...and is not a "God of the Gaps". In effect the Christian view of God. Still, we have not seen a physical proof of the existence of God, so each side of the argument stands their ground.
PeterS is forever throwing down the gauntlet for a... (show quote)


Perhaps those of faith should simply stand on 2 Corinthians and simply ignore atheists.

2 Corinthians 5:7 - King James Version
7. For we walk by faith, not by sight:

Reply
May 1, 2024 20:41:57   #
AuH20
 
Milosia2 wrote:
So , you were saying ,
What was the purpose of the thread !????


Has no value.

Reply
May 1, 2024 21:08:29   #
youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart
 
AuH20 wrote:
Has no value.


The thread or millstone? Oh ya, both.

Reply
May 1, 2024 22:07:24   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
youngwilliam wrote:
The thread or millstone? Oh ya, both.


Both!

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out topic: The debate
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.