One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump Trial: Love Versus Hate
Page <<first <prev 33 of 41 next> last>>
Apr 30, 2024 04:25:59   #
Bidentrump
 
JFlorio wrote:
He’ll never admit it. Either he’s an idiot or a troll. Maybe a trolling idiot. Presidents are the only entity that can obtain and keep classified documents outside of their job. They can declassify anything. Biden nor Pence could remove them from the SKIF. That’s the law. Probably a whole bunch of thieves would love to have the option of just giving stolen items back to keep from being prosecuted. Hillary was guilty of a crime. Comey named the statue she broke. He declined to prosecute her because as he put it, she didn’t intend to break the law. Even though service members have done the exact same thing, were arrested and served time. The statue specifically says intent is not a factor. So, yes, there is a two tiered justice system. One for the rich and powerful (especially Democrats) and one for the rest of us.
He’ll never admit it. Either he’s an idiot or a tr... (show quote)


If Trump really had something on Hillary, he would have gotten her prosecuted. Don't u think so? Since he didn't, then why not? Answer that pls.


Yes, I agree. There's two tiered system. One for Trump and one for everyone else.

This is the debate for adults!

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 06:20:57   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
NotMAGA wrote:
Bull pucky


After meetings at Whitehouse:

""Three prosecutors filed indictments against former President Donald Trump in close succession after he announced another run for president against Joe Biden in 2024.""
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzGxStwKWJPjBhSRDSGNLbDCPVSL
https://www.newsweek.com/fani-willis-kamala-harris-meeting-before-trump-case-what-we-know-1876958

Why? And if they were convinced of a crime, why didn't they file indictments before? And/or "Why would a prosecutor need the Biden Admin "co-sign" to prosecute a case?

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 07:10:53   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Bidentrump wrote:
Alledgedly right? Not proven in court of law, yet.
So why not? Trump was the President during Hillary email issues. Why didn't Trump's DOJ arrest and prosecute her?
Answer that pls....

And Biden returned the docs when he was asked to. So did Pence... right?

However, when Trump was asked to return them, he made all kinds of excuses not to return them.

1. Like, they are his personal items.
2.They have been declassified in his head.
3 They have been returned, yet many more were missing.
4. Lied some more to FBI.
5. And he tried to delete footage in where the docs were located.

Trump Obstructed vs. Cooperated.

So, that's the difference between Trumps and others who had some docs with them.

I would think you know all this.

And I want people to pay for the crimes they committed by going through the process in the court of law. That's how it works.


Do u see the difference?
Alledgedly right? Not proven in court of law, yet... (show quote)


Yeah she broke the law, her bud let her off scott free. Wonder if he would do the same for you!!!

"in a highly unusual public statement Tuesday morning, FBI director James Comey said Hillary Clinton and her aides may have violated the law in using a private email server when she was Secretary of State, but that their actions didn’t warrant criminal charges. In its year-long investigation of how government secrets got onto the server, Comey said, the FBI found “evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information,” but he said, “we are expressing to [the] Justice [department] our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.”

Reply
 
 
Apr 30, 2024 07:13:03   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Bidentrump wrote:
Now, who's talking about "feelings vs. Facts". Let the courts do their job. That's what it's for.


I didn't say anything about "feelings:, where do you come up with this crap. I talked about "witnessing" Biden make the statement as evidence. Are you dense or what?

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 07:18:47   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
NotMAGA wrote:
Should SCOTUS GIVE DJ what he wants, blanket immunity, and he IS elected in November, then he would be able to order a drone strike on anyone he dislikes. Go out and shoot someone in the middle of 6th Ave. Put anyone in jail who disagrees with him. He’d probably put Biden in jail without a trial by EO because that’s the only thing that can be done about all those “illegal” things Biden has done since “Presidents are immune from prosecution for “official acts.”

Is that really what YOU want?

I know who I believe is trying to destroy our Constitution, and it isn’t Joe Biden.
Should SCOTUS GIVE DJ what he wants, blanket immun... (show quote)


Your right about that. Joe can't even find his way off a stage. No, it's those who are pulling his strings, his puppet masters who are destroying our constitution.

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 07:19:22   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
JFlorio wrote:
Won't make a dent with that block head. Biden's the tyrant wannabe. It wasn't Trump who went ahead and ignored the highest Court in the land dealing with student loan forgiveness. If the DOJ wasn't corrupt they'd have prosecuted Biden for this. Same with the documents addle brain had all over the place. Prosecute one, must prosecute the other.



Reply
Apr 30, 2024 07:33:36   #
NotMAGA Loc: Upstate NY - in a very red county
 
Bidentrump wrote:
If Trump really had something on Hillary, he would have gotten her prosecuted. Don't u think so? Since he didn't, then why not? Answer that pls.


Yes, I agree. There's two tiered system. One for Trump and one for everyone else.

This is the debate for adults!


👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

Reply
 
 
Apr 30, 2024 07:34:59   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Bidentrump wrote:
Im sure those people who just walked in and did not break any law did not get arrested. If they did not break the law, there's nothing to be guilty of. If they can prove that they are innocent.

So, if they did broke the law, they should pay for their crime. Wouldn't u want proven criminals to pay for their crimes?

That's the rule of law!!!


I do want proven criminals to pay for the crimes like all the ones being released back on the streets who are already in our country illegally and committed a crime. But wont happen, the dems love their criminals, it's everybody else's they have a problem with. How many of the people from 2020 riots who were in the crowds but did not committ violence or loot and burn were convicted of misdemeanors for being present and demostating at the scenes? Here's my problem with the system, the prayer lady was convicted of 4 misdermeanors under those terms, show me "one" 2020 demostrator who was convicted under those terms. Just one!

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 10:26:03   #
Justice101
 
Bidentrump wrote:
So there you go... if congress approved, then it's ok? Is that right?

Or maybe it's because you have no student loan? But if he does the other things for you, car or mortgage payments, then you're ok with it?

Just to be clear, I don't have student loans. I do have mortgage and car loans. So that would be nice for me also. But I'm not sore about it. I'm able to pay them.

But it Seems biased to me, if that's what you're sore about, because it doesn't benefit you.



So, are you saying that Americans should share in paying for others' debts?
You are welcome to pay my share of taxes to cover this.

My spouse and I paid off our student loans.
Of course, it would also be biased against those who never attended college to pay for others' student loans.
We're paying more than enough for the unwelcome illegal invaders that the Biden regime let in to the US.
Don't ya think?

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 10:46:37   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Justice101 wrote:
So, are you saying that Americans should share in paying for others' debts?
You are welcome to pay my share of taxes to cover this.

My spouse and I paid off our student loans.
Of course, it would also be biased against those who never attended college to pay for others' student loans.
We're paying more than enough for the unwelcome illegal invaders that the Biden regime let in to the US.
Don't ya think?


Too many Democrats want others to pay their debts.
Another example of avoiding their own responsibility.

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 10:48:16   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Justice101 wrote:
So, are you saying that Americans should share in paying for others' debts?
You are welcome to pay my share of taxes to cover this.

My spouse and I paid off our student loans.
Of course, it would also be biased against those who never attended college to pay for others' student loans.
We're paying more than enough for the unwelcome illegal invaders that the Biden regime let in to the US.
Don't ya think?


Student loan forgiveness. Nice flowery phrases from Democrats. Actually means Democrats don't care that their word is no good. Democrats voted for the idiot (Obama) that switched college loans to the government, putting defaults on tax payers. Democrats don't care that by illegally forgiving these loans they are inadvertently raising the debt and inflation. Is anyone surprised that Democrat's words or promises mean nothing?

Reply
 
 
Apr 30, 2024 10:50:52   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
JFlorio wrote:
Student loan forgiveness. Nice flowery phrases from Democrats. Actually means Democrats don't care that their word is no good. Democrats voted for the idiot (Obama) that switched college loans to the government, putting defaults on tax payers. Democrats don't care that by illegally forgiving these loans they are inadvertently raising the debt and inflation. Is anyone surprised that Democrat's words or promises mean nothing?


"Is anyone surprised that Democrat's words or promises mean nothing?"

No reason to be surprised.

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 11:54:06   #
Bidentrump
 
microphor wrote:
Yeah she broke the law, her bud let her off scott free. Wonder if he would do the same for you!!!

"in a highly unusual public statement Tuesday morning, FBI director James Comey said Hillary Clinton and her aides may have violated the law in using a private email server when she was Secretary of State, but that their actions didn’t warrant criminal charges. In its year-long investigation of how government secrets got onto the server, Comey said, the FBI found “evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information,” but he said, “we are expressing to [the] Justice [department] our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.”
Yeah she broke the law, her bud let her off scott ... (show quote)


Why didn't Trump push for it? If there's enough evidence! His AG, Bill Barr should have pressed charges. And had a grand jury indict her, if there's enough evidence!

Trump was the President, he hated her so.....
Why didn't they indict Hillary?

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 12:06:01   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Bidentrump wrote:
Why didn't Trump push for it? If there's enough evidence! His AG, Bill Barr should have pressed charges. And had a grand jury indict her, if there's enough evidence!

Trump was the President, he hated her so.....
Why didn't they indict Hillary?


"Why didn't they indict Hillary?"

You tell me.

Here is some help;
Hillary the Scandals
https://youtu.be/BYKAzJcU-DA

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 12:18:56   #
Bidentrump
 
eagleye13 wrote:
"Is anyone surprised that Democrat's words or promises mean nothing?"

No reason to be surprised.


Didn't Trump raise the debt ceiling so high that we're now paying for it!

Here's a small clip for you. Lmk if this is a lie.







Reply
Page <<first <prev 33 of 41 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.