One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Would it have changed the 2016 vote?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
Apr 23, 2024 18:10:00   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
Lily wrote:
I heard that exact thing.


Please please please tell us where you heard that.

Turtle keeper, please do as well.

This oughta be good! They'll be up for a Peabody!!

Reply
Apr 23, 2024 18:24:09   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
federally indicted mattoid wrote:
Please please please tell us where you heard that.

Turtle keeper, please do as well.

This oughta be good! They'll be up for a Peabody!!

No more so than your innuendo slick.

Reply
Apr 23, 2024 19:04:58   #
WEBCO
 
NotMAGA wrote:
Again - if he had done anything actionable don't you think the Republicans in the House would have impeached him by now?


No, many of the records and documents requested by house committees haven't been handed over. You should know the facts

This was 6 days ago...
This was 6 days ago......



Reply
 
 
Apr 23, 2024 19:07:18   #
WEBCO
 
NotMAGA wrote:
There has been no impeachment. The House is in GOP control and they impeached Mayorkas, bit not Joe. If you have as much common sense as I believe you do that HAS to tell you something.


They opened an official impeachment inquiry to have the ability to subpoena documents and people. Unfortunately this administration is completely blocking any investigation into joe

Reply
Apr 23, 2024 20:35:31   #
youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart
 
federally indicted mattoid wrote:
I wonder how they feel about adulterous men impregnating their sidechicks. Trump paid for abortions, it's been said.


It's been said you had an abortion. Did Trump pay for it?

Reply
Apr 24, 2024 07:08:25   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
AuntiE wrote:
Because of the possibility of influence peddling. Frankly, I think every bloody one of our elected politicians have a family member selling influence!

If you or I had violated the two-three gun regulations he did, we would have already been in jail! Heck the ATF, years ago, was furious that UncleE could only tell them the month and year he sold a gun. Why can’t you tell us the exact date? Duh dweebs it was a decade ago.

You can talk about Trump, but Hunter Biden makes Trump look like a rookie. Drugs, more drugs, more drugs, hookers, more hookers, trying to deny his child, then trying to deny child support, taxes and the gun violations. Let us not leave out his affair with Beau’s widow. I am astonished another woman actually married him!
Because of the possibility of influence peddling. ... (show quote)


Makes you wonder, had to have been the money.

Reply
Apr 24, 2024 07:09:37   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
NotMAGA wrote:
For too long all the right talked about was Hunter Hunter Hunter... I never paid much attention to a story about him, didn't know he and Beau's widow had been together for awhile.
I suppose that, Biblically speaking, as Beau's brother Hunter would have been expected to take Hallie as his second wife after Beau died...
If they were Jewish and it was a couple thousand or so years ago, anyway. 😉


But that is if her first husband could not get her pregnant.

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2024 07:11:11   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
youngwilliam wrote:
What is so hard for you to understand is the DOJ is corrupt, withholding evidence and obstructing investigations. In time the truth will come out. Corruption is rampant in both parties.


Spot on, they suppressed it because they wanted slo Joe.

Reply
Apr 24, 2024 07:12:31   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
fastforwardr1 wrote:
How in the world can you say it did not matter, Brandon held 60million dollars over Ukraines head and told them they would not get the money if they did not fire the attorney general who was looking into fraud and corruption within Burisma. Brandons alter boy son was being paid massive amounts of money even though he he had no education or experiance in the field. Influence Peddling at its finest!


Absolutely, Joe is so guilty, but nothing will happen to him, probably not Hunter either.

Reply
Apr 24, 2024 09:59:44   #
XXX Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon
 
NotMAGA wrote:
It's a month before the election in 2016. We are just learning about the "Access Hollywood" 'pu$$y-grabber. DJ and his wife do an interview on TV, she says it's only "boy-talk" and no way would her husband REALLY do that. Besides, that video was years ago. This isn't what he's like now.
The drop in the polls slows - a little bit - but meanwhile there's another story out there waiting to break. One DJ knew could be the last nail on the coffin if it came out just NOW, so soon after Access Hollywood. This is a big one - about his brief out-of-town encounter with a porn star.
DJ is desperate to lock down the Stormy Daniels story and prevent more damage to his suddenly shaky campaign.
Enter "fixer," Michael Cohen, who, at Trump's behest, negotiates a secret $130,000 "hush money" payment to secure Daniels' silence days before the 2016 presidential election.
Instead of headlines blaring he had an affair with a porn star, he improbably wins election in a squeaker over Hillary Clinton, who won 3 million more popular votes but lost the.electoral count.

What IF the Stormy Daniels story HAD come out - on 60 Minutes, or 20/20 or even just the NYT or WaPo late that October? Would it have soured enough conservatives on the amoral adulterer that he would instead have lost the 2016 election?

Whild no one can positively know the answer, the probability is something most reasonable people would answer in the affirmative.

And THAT is why the trial going on now is about fraud and election interference.

DJ knowingly succeeded in influencing the outcome of that election with the hush money bribe made secretly and from which he attempted to distance himself.
It's a month before the election in 2016. We are j... (show quote)


Paying hush money isn't a crime

Reply
Apr 24, 2024 12:19:46   #
Justice101
 
XXX wrote:
Paying hush money isn't a crime


Neither is the National Enquirer's "catch and kill" concerning not publishing unfavorable stories about their friends.

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2024 12:23:25   #
XXX Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon
 
Justice101 wrote:
Neither is the National Enquirer's "catch and kill" concerning not publishing unfavorable stories about their friends.


I know

Reply
Apr 24, 2024 14:29:07   #
Salvatore
 
NotMAGA
First of all it's nobodies business what happens to a man and his whore! Especially it is not the governments business! It has been said many, many times by lawyers on TV that giving money to someone to keep quiet is not illegal! But when the FBI kept Hunter Biden's laptop a secret which would have turned the election in Trump's favor! It was shown after the election that about 7% of the people that voted for Biden would not have voted for him! But keep on making lies about Trump because, 'The People Are Wise About The Lies."

Reply
Apr 24, 2024 14:30:12   #
NotMAGA Loc: Upstate NY - in a very red county
 
XXX wrote:
Paying hush money isn't a crime


Depends on how it's paid, apparently.

Reply
Apr 24, 2024 14:32:00   #
NotMAGA Loc: Upstate NY - in a very red county
 
Justice101 wrote:
Neither is the National Enquirer's "catch and kill" concerning not publishing unfavorable stories about their friends.


If DJ hadn't been so cheap about it, he'd have been fine. It wasnt the act but the way he tried to cover it up that nailed him. He could have paid her himself from his billions but no, he wanted to use campaign funds.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.