Watch the deep fakes come out.. (Page 3): I think that you have that backwards. It was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats who engineered the Russian hoax with the fake Steele Dossier...

Justice101

NotMAGA wrote:

Not saying the far left wouldn't. But the Russians are much more in the ears and heads of the right.

I think that you have that backwards.

It was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats who engineered the Russian hoax with the fake Steele Dossier, and it was the Democrats who made up the letter that the 51 spooks signed regarding Hunter Biden's laptop being Russian disinformation that gave Joe Biden a talking point in one of the Presidential debates against Trump and could be construed as election interference. Shifty Adam Shift insisted (lied) that he has proof that Trump is a "Russian asset" except that he could never prove it.

NotMAGA Loc: Upstate NY - in a very red county

Lily wrote:

You overlook, unsurprisingly, China’s need for land to feed its population. They have slowly been buying up agricultural land and more frightening land surrounding our home military bases, but hey, it’s Russia.

Russia and China have more or less become allies )In case you missed it).

Lily

NotMAGA wrote:

Russia and China have more or less become allies )In case you missed it).

But, it is China, not Russia, moving into Africa and South America. Russia doesn’t need the minerals and petroleum. They have their own sources.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

NotMAGA wrote:

The horrific part of the 2024 election year is how... (show quote)

ahahahahaha, ahahahahaha, ahahahahaha Have we caught that canibal who ate Joe's uncle yer? ahahaha, ahahahaha LMAO

pegw

Parky60 wrote:

And of course it will only be used by the right? Why don't you double-check your "fact-checkers".

So you are asking if my fact checkers are legit? I have done that, and you can search for reviews of them too, only if you are looking for the truth, which you seem to avoid at all costs

Rose42

pegw wrote:

So you are asking if my fact checkers are legit? I have done that, and you can search for reviews of them too, only if you are looking for the truth, which you seem to avoid at all costs

Yet again, YOU DON’T FACT CHECK. Looking at opinions of websites is NOT fact checking

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

pegw wrote:

So you are asking if my fact checkers are legit? I have done that, and you can search for reviews of them too, only if you are looking for the truth, which you seem to avoid at all costs

You get to determine what is true or does your CNN and MSNBC tell you what is true? Rhetorical question. We know the answer.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Rose42 wrote:

Yet again, YOU DON’T FACT CHECK. Looking at opinions of websites is NOT fact checking

It is simply easier to let them tell her what things are than to check the Federal Register, SCOTUS website, etc. It is unlikely she could tell you who Brookings or Cato Institutes are but can tell you Heritage is bad.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

pegw wrote:

So you are asking if my fact checkers are legit? I have done that, and you can search for reviews of them too, only if you are looking for the truth, which you seem to avoid at all costs

No Peg, you avoid the truth. If a leftist site tells you something, you believe it. Have you watched the hearings of leftist being challenged about their lies? Suppress info, laptop, collusion, 51 agents signing off on lie, altered document, border, collusion lie, and it just goes on and on and on but CNN doesn't show you that, you have to seek it yourself!

Rose42

AuntiE wrote:

It is simply easier to let them tell her what things are than to check the Federal Register, SCOTUS website, etc. It is unlikely she could tell you who Brookings or Cato Institutes are but can tell you Heritage is bad.

Yeah too many rely on others opinions.

pegw

AuntiE wrote:

You get to determine what is true or does your CNN and MSNBC tell you what is true? Rhetorical question. We know the answer.

CNN and MSNBC and legitimate news sources all hire fact checkers. In order for a story to be aired, they need a minimum of three different sources to verify the story. Rarely if they run a story that doesn't have three independent sources, they will put that fact in the story.

Justice101

pegw wrote:

CNN and MSNBC and legitimate news sources all hire fact checkers. In order for a story to be aired, they need a minimum of three different sources to verify the story. Rarely if they run a story that doesn't have three independent sources, they will put that fact in the story.

Where did you get this information? It sounds like you either made it up or got it from your leftist fact checkers.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

Justice101 wrote:

Where did you get this information? It sounds like you either made it up or got it from your leftist fact checkers.

She made it up.

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

microphor wrote:

She made it up.

Definitely

pegw

microphor wrote:

No Peg, you avoid the truth. If a leftist site tells you something, you believe it. Have you watched the hearings of leftist being challenged about their lies? Suppress info, laptop, collusion, 51 agents signing off on lie, altered document, border, collusion lie, and it just goes on and on and on but CNN doesn't show you that, you have to seek it yourself!

You wouldn't believe the truth if it bit you in the face. Fact checking organizations like factCheck, Media Bias, AllSides, Biasly and PoitiFact all rate the sleezy news sources that you believe, despite evidence to the contrary.