XXX
Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon
*** a provision to allow the U.S. to use seized Russian assets to assist Ukraine,
>>>That is plain and simple theft. We have no right, even if they pass a law saying so, to steal another nations money and give it to someone else. And after the war, they would be able to sue America for those funds they gave to America. With interest.
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
I never ever thought I would say, bring McCarthy back.
XXX
Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon
AuntiE wrote:
I never ever thought I would say, bring McCarthy back.
Me also. Although due to the circumstances I wouldn't support Mike being ousted.
XXX
Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon
LogicallyRight wrote:
*** a provision to allow the U.S. to use seized Russian assets to assist Ukraine,
>>>That is plain and simple theft. We have no right, even if they pass a law saying so, to steal another nations money and give it to someone else. And after the war, they would be able to sue America for those funds they gave to America. With interest.
America doesn't give a rats ass about others. As long as they can f up the world.
LogicallyRight wrote:
*** a provision to allow the U.S. to use seized Russian assets to assist Ukraine,
>>>That is plain and simple theft. We have no right, even if they pass a law saying so, to steal another nations money and give it to someone else. And after the war, they would be able to sue America for those funds they gave to America. With interest.
Oh come now .
You too ???
Defending Vladimir Putin???
Putin had no right to invade our ally Ukraine , did he ???
We should of course offer Putin a choice of either Leaving Ukraine with his money intact or continuing his assault on Ukraine and losing his money !!!!
It wouldn’t be fair to just take it would it. ????
Or would it. ?
Putin was told not to invade Ukraine.
So , in my opinion he gets whatever he has coming to him , with or without your faulty fealty to Vladimir. .
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
Milosia2 wrote:
Oh come now .
You too ???
Defending Vladimir Putin???
Putin had no right to invade our ally Ukraine , did he ???
We should of course offer Putin a choice of either Leaving Ukraine with his money intact or continuing his assault on Ukraine and losing his money !!!!
It wouldn’t be fair to just take it would it. ????
Or would it. ?
Putin was told not to invade Ukraine.
So , in my opinion he gets whatever he has coming to him , with or without your faulty fealty to Vladimir. .
Oh come now . br You too ??? br Defending Vladim... (
show quote)
Ukraine is the CIA’s ally courtesy of Victoria Nuland.
As sanctions only improved Russia’s finances, taking the money may be an alternative. If any is held in US banks it could be frozen.
No, he was not told. Biden clearly said a small incursion would not be objectionable.
Keep in mind all of this is a direct result of the US failing to abide by agreements made decades ago.
We understand reading, especially history, may be difficult; however, maybe you could find an audio book, or middle schooler to read for you.
And for the record it was not Johnsons plan to use Russian money , he never had the brains for such a thing .
Milosia2 wrote:
Oh come now .
You too ???
Defending Vladimir Putin???
Putin had no right to invade our ally Ukraine , did he ???
We should of course offer Putin a choice of either Leaving Ukraine with his money intact or continuing his assault on Ukraine and losing his money !!!!
It wouldn’t be fair to just take it would it. ????
Or would it. ?
Putin was told not to invade Ukraine.
So , in my opinion he gets whatever he has coming to him , with or without your faulty fealty to Vladimir. .
Oh come now . br You too ??? br Defending Vladim... (
show quote)
Better then the idiots defending biden. At least he cares about his country and is defending it.
***Putin had no right to invade our ally Ukraine , did he ???
>>>Ukraine was not our ally. Just the most corrupt country in Europe that America was using as a tool to invade Russia, by encircling them. We started this war with an illegal coup in 2014 that cost 14.000 lives before Russia finally stepped in to defend Ethnic Russians among other reasons.
***We should of course offer Putin a choice of either Leaving Ukraine with his money intact or continuing his assault on Ukraine and losing his money !!!!
>>>We should stay out of it and let Russia and Ukraine settle their differences on their own. Then Russia will win in a short time with minimal Ukrainian lives lost, that you car nothing about. Putin will then dictate terms that will include guarantees that Ukraine remain neutral and give up some of the lands that were populated by ethnic Russians. And then peace and both side can rebuild.
If ewe had the intelligence to understand I would explain further. But it has been done time and time again and apparently ewe don't read or have the intelligence to learn.
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
Milosia2 wrote:
And for the record it was not Johnsons plan to use Russian money , he never had the brains for such a thing .
As you purport to be an expert on all things Russia, are any of Russia’s funds held in US banks?
If not, exactly how do you propose Johnson use Russia’s own funds?
I know it may be difficult for you; however, for a change try to write in clear sentences as opposed to your usual drivel.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.