Many of our NYC judges, district and prosecuting attorneys are bringing charges to their political opponent based on a predetermined outcome of a trial which is an injustice to the defendant. In a number of cases against Donald Trump, the district attorney Letitia James and Judge Engoron approached the case against their political opponent, DJT with the objective of a predetermined outcome in mind before hearing any of the facts or circumstances of the case.
Proverbs 18:13 says: "If one gives an answer before he hears, it is his folly and shame." Justice based on predetermined outcomes is not really justice. In instances where a predetermined outcome is present, there is usually injustice involved such as bribery, or partiality (Deutreonomy 16:19-20). This brings into question as to what is the reasons the judge and district attorney brought the case against DJT and what do they personally and politically have to gain.
The goal of the justice system should be one that upholds human rights and the dignity of people regardless of background, political affiliation or financial well being. If we allow predetermined outcomes to occur in our court system, true justice will never be served.
tbutkovich wrote:
Many of our NYC judges, district and prosecuting attorneys are bringing charges to their political opponent based on a predetermined outcome of a trial which is an injustice to the defendant. In a number of cases against Donald Trump, the district attorney Letitia James and Judge Engoron approached the case against their political opponent, DJT with the objective of a predetermined outcome in mind before hearing any of the facts or circumstances of the case.
Proverbs 18:13 says: "If one gives an answer before he hears, it is his folly and shame." Justice based on predetermined outcomes is not really justice. In instances where a predetermined outcome is present, there is usually injustice involved such as bribery, or partiality (Deutreonomy 16:19-20). This brings into question as to what is the reasons the judge and district attorney brought the case against DJT and what do they personally and politically have to gain.
The goal of the justice system should be one that upholds human rights and the dignity of people regardless of background, political affiliation or financial well being. If we allow predetermined outcomes to occur in our court system, true justice will never be served.
Many of our NYC judges, district and prosecuting a... (
show quote)
Engoron stated publicly before the trial that Trump was guilty. He also stated he would not allow a jury trial if one was requested.
tbutkovich wrote:
Many of our NYC judges, district and prosecuting attorneys are bringing charges to their political opponent based on a predetermined outcome of a trial which is an injustice to the defendant. In a number of cases against Donald Trump, the district attorney Letitia James and Judge Engoron approached the case against their political opponent, DJT with the objective of a predetermined outcome in mind before hearing any of the facts or circumstances of the case.
Proverbs 18:13 says: "If one gives an answer before he hears, it is his folly and shame." Justice based on predetermined outcomes is not really justice. In instances where a predetermined outcome is present, there is usually injustice involved such as bribery, or partiality (Deutreonomy 16:19-20). This brings into question as to what is the reasons the judge and district attorney brought the case against DJT and what do they personally and politically have to gain.
The goal of the justice system should be one that upholds human rights and the dignity of people regardless of background, political affiliation or financial well being. If we allow predetermined outcomes to occur in our court system, true justice will never be served.
Many of our NYC judges, district and prosecuting a... (
show quote)
They might just as well go ahead and pronounce the sentence that has already been determined.
Trump cannot get a fair trial in NYC because the Court System in the NYC District is Aptly Defined as a Kangaroo Court System
Kangaroo court is an informal pejorative term for a court that ignores recognized standards of law or justice, carries little or no official standing in the territory within which it resides, and is typically convened ad hoc.
A kangaroo court may ignore due process and come to a predetermined conclusion. The term is also used for a court held by a legitimate judicial authority, but which intentionally disregards the court's legal or ethical obligations (compare show trial).
A kangaroo court could also develop when the structure and operation of the forum result in an inferior brand of adjudication. A common example of this is when institutional disputants ("repeat players") have excessive and unfair structural advantages over individual disputants ("one-shot players").
The institutional disputant would be Letitia James who was involved in other court cases where she made substantial gains at the expense of other one shot players/defendants.
tbutkovich wrote:
Trump cannot get a fair trial in NYC because the Court System in the NYC District is Aptly Defined as a Kangaroo Court System
Kangaroo court is an informal pejorative term for a court that ignores recognized standards of law or justice, carries little or no official standing in the territory within which it resides, and is typically convened ad hoc.
A kangaroo court may ignore due process and come to a predetermined conclusion. The term is also used for a court held by a legitimate judicial authority, but which intentionally disregards the court's legal or ethical obligations (compare show trial).
A kangaroo court could also develop when the structure and operation of the forum result in an inferior brand of adjudication. A common example of this is when institutional disputants ("repeat players") have excessive and unfair structural advantages over individual disputants ("one-shot players").
The institutional disputant would be Letitia James who was involved in other court cases where she made substantial gains at the expense of other one shot players/defendants.
Trump cannot get a fair trial in NYC because the C... (
show quote)
Fat ass bragg just like witch james was running on 'Get Trump'... So they got their wish, those fricking assholes..😡😡😡👿👿👿
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.