AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
This is a bit of a whine.
I spent 45 minutes, reconfiguring a very very very long article on China and Africa. Because of OPP restricting length, I had to post it in 4 parts.
By the numbers: Part 1 = 16 views; Part 2 = 10 views; Part 3 = 11 views; Part 4 = 26 views.
Is it really that difficult to read the entirety. Have we reached such a point in attention span that we cannot read indepth information? If you only read Part 4, you missed a lot of information.
What I have learned is it is not worth the effort to provide indepth information on this forum. China thanks you for your lack of attention.
Thus endth my whine.
AuntiE wrote:
This is a bit of a whine.
I spent 45 minutes, reconfiguring a very very very long article on China and Africa. Because of OPP restricting length, I had to post it in 4 parts.
By the numbers: Part 1 = 16 views; Part 2 = 10 views; Part 3 = 11 views; Part 4 = 26 views.
Is it really that difficult to read the entirety. Have we reached such a point in attention span that we cannot read indepth information? If you only read Part 4, you missed a lot of information.
What I have learned is it is not worth the effort to provide indepth information on this forum. China thanks you for your lack of attention.
Thus endth my whine.
This is a bit of a whine. br br I spent 45 minut... (
show quote)
Good whine...
People are stimulation junkies these days...
At least you didn't complain about the quality of the majority of replies😅😅😅
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Good whine...
People are stimulation junkies these days...
At least you didn't complain about the quality of the majority of replies😅😅😅
As there was only one reply, how could I complain?
That's a complaint right there
AuntiE wrote:
This is a bit of a whine.
I spent 45 minutes, reconfiguring a very very very long article on China and Africa. Because of OPP restricting length, I had to post it in 4 parts.
By the numbers: Part 1 = 16 views; Part 2 = 10 views; Part 3 = 11 views; Part 4 = 26 views.
Is it really that difficult to read the entirety. Have we reached such a point in attention span that we cannot read indepth information? If you only read Part 4, you missed a lot of information.
What I have learned is it is not worth the effort to provide indepth information on this forum. China thanks you for your lack of attention.
Thus endth my whine.
This is a bit of a whine. br br I spent 45 minut... (
show quote)
I missed it - I don’t use latest digest or newest topics
AuntiE wrote:
This is a bit of a whine.
I spent 45 minutes, reconfiguring a very very very long article on China and Africa. Because of OPP restricting length, I had to post it in 4 parts.
By the numbers: Part 1 = 16 views; Part 2 = 10 views; Part 3 = 11 views; Part 4 = 26 views.
Is it really that difficult to read the entirety. Have we reached such a point in attention span that we cannot read indepth information? If you only read Part 4, you missed a lot of information.
What I have learned is it is not worth the effort to provide indepth information on this forum. China thanks you for your lack of attention.
Thus endth my whine.
This is a bit of a whine. br br I spent 45 minut... (
show quote)
I found it and read it all. This is something we should be concerned about. We’re too dependent on China
AuntiE wrote:
This is a bit of a whine.
I spent 45 minutes, reconfiguring a very very very long article on China and Africa. Because of OPP restricting length, I had to post it in 4 parts.
By the numbers: Part 1 = 16 views; Part 2 = 10 views; Part 3 = 11 views; Part 4 = 26 views.
Is it really that difficult to read the entirety. Have we reached such a point in attention span that we cannot read indepth information? If you only read Part 4, you missed a lot of information.
What I have learned is it is not worth the effort to provide indepth information on this forum. China thanks you for your lack of attention.
Thus endth my whine.
This is a bit of a whine. br br I spent 45 minut... (
show quote)
You’re right. If it goes over a paragraph or 2, it’s above their reading skills.
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
Lily wrote:
You’re right. If it goes over a paragraph or 2, it’s above their reading skills.
Keep in mind it is conservatives who are uninformed.
Keep in mind Russia, Russia, Russia. These dweebs are worried about Russia taking over Europe. Let him. There are very few minerals in Europe.
They completely ignore China’s moves in South America and now were to lazy to see China is going to be the mover in Africa where vast natural resources are located.
Start learning Mandarin and collecting yen.
AuntiE wrote:
This is a bit of a whine.
I spent 45 minutes, reconfiguring a very very very long article on China and Africa. Because of OPP restricting length, I had to post it in 4 parts.
By the numbers: Part 1 = 16 views; Part 2 = 10 views; Part 3 = 11 views; Part 4 = 26 views.
Is it really that difficult to read the entirety. Have we reached such a point in attention span that we cannot read indepth information? If you only read Part 4, you missed a lot of information.
What I have learned is it is not worth the effort to provide indepth information on this forum. China thanks you for your lack of attention.
Thus endth my whine.
This is a bit of a whine. br br I spent 45 minut... (
show quote)
It was a very good article
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
Bassman65 wrote:
It was a very good article
Thank you for taking the time to read it.
My personal opinion is the progressives use Russia as a distraction from their chosen dictator, China.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.