One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Democrats 'Orwellian': Porn-for-kids gets labeled as 'decency'
Mar 24, 2024 14:58:04   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
'Words have no meaning anymore'.

A new commentary is revealing how Democrats in one state are pushing their "decency" agenda, so that children will have access to pornographic materials in libraries.

https://www.wnd.com/2024/03/orwellian-porn-kids-gets-labeled-decency/?utm_source=wnd-news-alerts.beehiiv.com&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=breaking-news-alert-3-24-2024-2

Reply
Mar 24, 2024 15:14:46   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
Ri-chard wrote:
'Words have no meaning anymore'.

A new commentary is revealing how Democrats in one state are pushing their "decency" agenda, so that children will have access to pornographic materials in libraries.

https://www.wnd.com/2024/03/orwellian-porn-kids-gets-labeled-decency/?utm_source=wnd-news-alerts.beehiiv.com&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=breaking-news-alert-3-24-2024-2


Ri-chard, It all depends on what you consider to be porn. Many classic works are being banned from schools because they may deal with sexual matters. Catcher in the Rye is but one example. Sex is part of human existence, and as such should be dealt with. Don't get me wrong, I too am against real porn being allowed to be part of the curriculum. As a special education teacher of seriously disturbed teens, I never had a high school student that hasn't watched pornography on line. It has become the new sex ed.

Reply
Mar 24, 2024 15:48:40   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Ri-chard, It all depends on what you consider to be porn. Many classic works are being banned from schools because they may deal with sexual matters. Catcher in the Rye is but one example. Sex is part of human existence, and as such should be dealt with. Don't get me wrong, I too am against real porn being allowed to be part of the curriculum. As a special education teacher of seriously disturbed teens, I never had a high school student that hasn't watched pornography on line. It has become the new sex ed.
Ri-chard, It all depends on what you consider to b... (show quote)


Your response id typical of a government agent. Good Luck

Reply
 
 
Mar 25, 2024 20:43:45   #
1 hollywood.
 
Ri-chard wrote:
Your response id typical of a government agent. Good Luck


Right at the beginning of his/her response is the same thing I thought .

Reply
Mar 26, 2024 16:31:40   #
facts matter
 
Ri-chard wrote:
Your response id typical of a government agent. Good Luck


It's for parents to decide what their children should read, not anyone else. This is America and we don't ban books. It's part of freedom of speech. Have you heard of that?

Reply
Mar 26, 2024 16:47:53   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
facts matter wrote:
It's for parents to decide what their children should read, not anyone else. This is America and we don't ban books. It's part of freedom of speech. Have you heard of that?


So is that why the editors of Bible banned so many books and burned others it was free speech? They only wanted you to know what they think you need to know.

However, Children don't need to know how to put a condom on a banana, how to give a good BJ, the proper way to stimulate a girl's joy spot, boy on boy sex, anal sex, girl on girl sex, you can get sexual health care if a boy thinks he's a girl or a girl thinks she is a boy just get your junk removed.

All's good for the queer degenerates and their evil democrat supporters.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.