Coos Bay Tom wrote:
Guess he is trying to scare up some votes . lol typical threats from a bully .
Tom, there you go again believing every POS lie out there. Come on Tom, you are better than that, research before you repeat stupid things the leftist are saying.
The truth Tom, he said that if Biden gets re-elected that it “ will be a bloodbath for the auto industry “!
Please tell me and everyone else in detail just how exactly does that make him a bully?
TJKMO
Loc: Bicycle Heaven
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
You can count on it if the cheat happens again
Thank you for confirming Trump’s Bloodbath message.
Milosia2 wrote:
His statement was
“If I don’t Win , there will be a Bloodbath !!!!”
This type of trump crazy is running the show today .
He is eliciting from his magamorons stochastic terrorism .
Random acts of terrorism instilled by dear leader
But with no real connection to it.
I mean , I don’t wanna see your house burn down.
But Hey , things happen !
Trumps bunions think they are acting as trumps personal
Patriots .
For trumps’ cause.
A sad and deluded bunch , for whom ,
Things will not end well. !
His statement was br “If I don’t Win , there will... (
show quote)
He said that “ if Biden gets re-elected, it will be a bloodbath for the auto industry “.
It’s getting really old correcting you lying POS communists that are dumber than dirt.
Once again you know nothing of which you speak!
TJKMO
Loc: Bicycle Heaven
Mogon wrote:
Tom, there you go again believing every POS lie out there. Come on Tom, you are better than that, research before you repeat stupid things the leftist are saying.
The truth Tom, he said that if Biden gets re-elected that it “ will be a bloodbath for the auto industry “!
Please tell me and everyone else in detail just how exactly does that make him a bully?
Below is a transcript of Trump’s EXACT words.
Once again his campaign had to spin his vile comments.
“We’re going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those guys if I get elected,” Trump said during a rally in Vandalia, Ohio. “Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole – that’s gonna be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That’ll be the least of it.”
TJKMO wrote:
You are wrong.
It was a lynch mob.
They stormed the Capitol with energy and intent.
Or did you forget?
Why did it take trump 187 minutes to stop it only AFTER they were being chased out of the CAPITOL?
He saw what the rest of America saw.
Ivanka and others begged him to intervene.
He ignored them.
I’m not wrong. It was a ragtag group of idiots that were unorganized and clueless. If this mythical cult was real there would have been many more, they’d have been organized and they would have succeeded.
If you’re waiting for me to defend trump you’ll be waiting a long time.
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I am never going to forget about January 6th-- ever-- or change my opinion on who was the instigator of it --never--.
Tom, you mind is a bear trap!
Completely closed shut, not a crack of daylight to listen to anything other what you think you know. You have posted several times that you don’t care what anyone says, you know you’re right.
That my friend is a completely closed mind.
Absolutely no room for debate.
A smart person listens to all opinions, researches that opinion and it’s it right, you should take that as your stand and change your mind.
If someone convinces me different from what I believe with proof, then I change my mind on that matter. It’s not a sign of weakness, but a sign of intelligence and maturity.
Tom, lose the bear trap!
TJKMO
Loc: Bicycle Heaven
Justice101 wrote:
A President doesn't get immunity if he commits murder.
That's irrational and dangerous.
https://theconversation.com/can-trump-be-prosecuted-supreme-court-will-take-up-precedent-setting-case-to-define-the-limits-of-presidential-immunity-224730The precise phrasing of the question the Supreme Court said it will answer is interesting: “Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.” The court stated it will answer not only whether Trump might have immunity but also “to what extent” that immunity exists.
This raises the possibility that rather than simply answer if Trump does or does not have immunity, the court may be looking to extend immunity to some of Trump’s actions and not others. It could also indicate that at least some justices believe future presidents should enjoy some immunity from criminal prosecutions for actions they took while in office, but that this should not extend to what it is alleged Trump did in this Jan. 6 case.
Making this kind of distinction – which the D.C. Circuit ruling did not – could explain why at least four justices on the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. Rather than simply affirm – or reverse – the lower court, the justices may be interested in making a more nuanced ruling than the lower courts have done.
A President doesn't get immunity if he commits mur... (
show quote)
The DC Court was HIGHLY NUANCED.
“
But the court opted to say “no” to all of these ridiculous claims in style. It was a full “benchslap”—a ruling that goes out of its way to show that the arguments made by the loser are wrong, incoherent, and ignorant of prevailing laws and precedents. The court pointed out that Trump was “citizen Trump,” entitled to no more or less than any other criminal defendant. It laughed off the suggestion that prosecuting Trump would have a “chilling effect” on future presidents who may want to commit crimes, noting that every other president has understood themselves to be subjected to crimnal laws after they leave office (citing Richard Nixon’s need for pardon to protect him from further prosecution and Bill Clinton’s agreement to suspend his law license) and saying that post-office prosecution serves the “structural benefit” to “deter possible abuses of power.” The court even called Trump’s reading of the impeachment clause “tortured” and used the words of his own impeachment lawyer, as well as Senator Mitch McConnell, to underscore the point, made during Trump’s second impeachment trial, that Trump could still be held accountable by criminal courts after a Senate acquittal.”
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/the-dc-circuit-shredded-trumps-immunity-claims/
TJKMO wrote:
You are wrong.
It was a lynch mob.
They stormed the Capitol with energy and intent.
Or did you forget?
Why did it take trump 187 minutes to stop it only AFTER they were being chased out of the CAPITOL?
He saw what the rest of America saw.
Ivanka and others begged him to intervene.
He ignored them.
Have you read Rep Loudermilk's report yet on the Preliminary Investigation of the January 6 Select Committee?
In the investigation it was found that Trump did request 10,000 National Guard Troops 2 days before the rally and the request was turned down by Muriel Bowser and Nancy Pelosi.
You can read about Cassidy Hutchinson' lies she told on the "made for television kangaroo court"(my words in quotation).
There are other interesting "finds" in the document as well.
I'm certain that it will be updated as they squeeze more information out of Benny Thompson.
A bright light needs to be shown on their culpability, lies and malfeasance! Accountability would be better.
https://cha.house.gov/2024/3/chairman-loudermilk-releases-january-6-initial-findings-reportInteresting NEWS.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/j6-committee-failed-to-preserve-records-has-no-data-on-capitol-hill-security-failures-gop-charges/ar-AA1eXWGe
Big Kahuna wrote:
If you are almost 80, you were definitely skipped over in the wisdom dept. I'm sure you lacked wisdom at 20 but to think that 60 years later you still lack wisdom is criminal. As for senile joe, he has already ruined at least 50% of our democratic principles and is heading toward ruining the other 50% before he croaks or leaves office shortly.
I was going to post a similar post but thought if he’s that stupid, we’d be wasting our time.
TJKMO
Loc: Bicycle Heaven
Rose42 wrote:
I’m not wrong. It was a ragtag group of idiots that were unorganized and clueless. If this mythical cult was real there would have been many more, they’d have been organized and they would have succeeded.
If you’re waiting for me to defend trump you’ll be waiting a long time.
You speak MAGA in your every post, yet you say you are not. MAGA.
If you are not MAGA, then you won’t mind Renouncing MAGA in All its Works and Pomp’s.
Will you commit to that?
Big Kahuna wrote:
You are almost 80 and still have no morals. What a wasted life.
The sad thing is that after he passes, he will still be voting democrat for the next 50 years!!!
TJKMO wrote:
You speak MAGA in your every post, yet you say you are not. MAGA.
If you are not MAGA, then you won’t mind Renouncing MAGA in All its Works and Pomp’s.
Will you commit to that?
I don’t ‘speak maga’. You try to slap that label on anyone who doesn’t see things your way. Thats not rational
TJKMO
Loc: Bicycle Heaven
Rose42 wrote:
I don’t ‘speak maga’. You try to slap that label on anyone who doesn’t see things your way. Thats not rational
So will you commit to Renouncing MAGA and all its Works and Pomps?
Or will you continue to weave and dodge?
If you are not MAGA, it should be an easy choice.
What is it going to be?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.