I'll take you more seriously when you can finally provide examples or evidence to back up your claims. So far, what I hear from Trump supporters is 100% claim and 0% substance.

Trump is facing 91 felony charges, he's been impeached twice and his business career is a long trail of civil cases and settlements. Biden simply doesn't have that history and yet you expect me to believe Biden is the corrupt one. It's one thing to call it politics but aside from the impeachments, none of the charges are coming from national Democrats. To actually believe Trump is less corrupt than Biden you would have to first believe that for about 50 years people have been trying to destroy him with false charges. I just find that highly unlikely.

Also, just point this out... my arguments on this matter are hinged on patterns of behavior not specific reports. I've only been using specific accounts to provide examples of such behavior.

It does. I recently posted a response to Parky who challenged someone to bring up specifics on how Trump can be described as "authoritarian" and I went into detail about his inclination to avoid opposition in matters in which due process demands consensus.

I have also recently brought up his dismissal of the Palestinian interest in his so-called "peace deal" and his dismissal of the provisional Afghani government in his surrender to the Taliban.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Trump is trying to be a dictator. I am convinced that these dismissals are a sign of weakness. Trump is a really bad negotiator which is why he always had to lie about things like property value to compensate when making real-estate deals.

As a businessman, he is used to having more control over decisions because in the private sector, people generally don't argue with the boss. But democratic governments are different. This is why I insist that the notion that a government should be run like a business is a really stupid idea that exposes the ignorance of the person making that claim.

Trump never passed a significant bi-partisan bill into law because he simply doesn't have the strength or the ability to negotiate an open field of conflict. In contrast, Biden passed the bi-partisan infrastructure bill in his second year.

It's the same in foreign policy... As much as you folks want to believe the Iran deal was "bad" Obama actually got the entire European Union, Russia, China AND Iran to sign on. That's because Obama was really good at negotiating an open field of conflict. Trump was never able to replace it like he initially said he was going to because unless he can make the decision by himself he is useless. Not to mention the fact that none of the leaders in those other countries had any respect for him.

He hated the multilateral conferences, because when he was only one of many participants it became really obvious how underqualified he is. I still remember when all the leaders at the EU laughed at him. I mean they actually laughed at him, I saw the video. Trump always tried to push for bilateral agreements because in a one on one situation it would be more common for the other side to be polite and ignore his stupidity.

Trump's record on multilateral agreements and bi-partisan legislation is abysmal and his tendency to avoid them was very noticeable. If he were to return to office we can certainly expect more of the same.

So what I am saying here is that it's not through his ambitions that we are concerned that he will be a dictator but through his weakness and his inability to function as a truly democratic leader.