publican wrote:
When the Founders set up the electoral college scheme for electing the president, it seemed like a good idea. But the way it functions now contains a fatal problem.
To show the principle involved I am going to use very approximate numbers. Those who can't handle simple arithmetic, and those who don't understand what "very approximate" means, need read no further.
Let's assume there are 200 million voters distributed among 50 states, so each state has 4 million voters. We also assume each state uses the "winner take all" method. To win the election a candidate then needs to win 26 states. In each state he needs 2M plus 1 votes. So altogether he needs to win 52,000,026 votes, which just over a quarter of the total votes. In this way a demagogue with a solid base of less than a third of the electorate can become president.
When the Founders set up the electoral college sch... (
show quote)
First you need to understand how the electoral college is set up. To prevent the large cities from controlling government it is set to allow the 1,759,000 rural voters to have a chance of a voice in the vote. I have heard this BS for so long that each time I hear it I ask why don’t you understand? The answer really is simple big cities are supported by their whole state taking tax dollars away from the people who seldom go to those cities. It is NOT FAIR to the people living in rural areas of a state to be totally ruled by the cities.