Oh boy, I am contending with a genius. No kidding Sherlock, it is not in the DSM. Ever hear of satire? Street language? And I will no longer provide anything to a libtard. It doesn't pay to waste my time. Why? Because liberals (lib) are retarded (tard) hence libtard. The tard part means you do not learn no matter the topic. And proof? Even if it is the proof such as looking at the prices of groceries. A libtard will tell you it is to improve the economy. Hence libtard. Got it yet? Trust me junior, you couldn't shine my shoes in an intellectual capacity!

The legislation is not about reducing pregnancies.
125 House Republicans — including Speaker Mike Johnson — back a 'life at conception' bill without any IVF exception
Most House Republicans have cosponsored a bill declaring that life begins from the moment of conception, a position under increased scrutiny after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are "unborn children."

This Congress, 125 House Republicans — including Speaker Mike Johnson — have cosponsored the "Life at Conception Act," which states that the term "human being" includes "all stages of life, including the moment of fertilization, cloning, or other moment at which an individual member of the human species comes into being."

The bill does not include any exception for in vitro fertilization (IVF), a reproductive treatment that allows mothers to fertilize several eggs outside the womb to increase the chances of a viable pregnancy.

Several healthcare providers in Alabama have already halted IVF programs in the wake of the ruling, given that IVF treatments may include the discarding of fertilized eggs, which may now violate the state's Wrongful Death of a Minor Act.

The lack of an IVF exception is notable, given the carveout contained within a previous version of the Life at Conception Act introduced by Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky in 2017.

"Nothing in this Act shall be construed to require the prosecution of any woman for the death of her unborn child, a prohibition on in vitro fertilization, or a prohibition on use of birth control or another means of preventing fertilization," reads the 2017 bill.

Republican Rep. Alexander Mooney, the main House sponsor of the bill, did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider on why that exception was not included.

Johnson, one of the co-sponsors of the bill, largely controls the House floor. His evangelical Christian views have entailed staunch opposition to abortion in the past.

"When a woman is pregnant, science tells us the new life she carries is a completely separate and fully new human being from the moment of fertilization," Johnson said during a 2021 hearing on Texas's 6-week abortion ban.

But in a statement on Friday night after the initial publication of this article, Johnson stated that he supports IVF treatment and applauded Alabama lawmakers for moving to protect the treatment in the wake of the ruling.

"I believe the life of every single child has inestimable dignity and value," said Johnson. "That is why I support IVF treatment, which has been a blessing for many moms and dads who have struggled with fertility."

In the wake of the Alabama ruling, some Republicans have scrambled to declare their support for IVF treatments, recognizing the unpopularity of any potential ban.

That includes GOP Senate candidates in competitive battleground states, who quickly moved to issue pro-IVF statements on Friday with the encouragement of Senate Republicans' campaign arm.

Some House Republicans in swing seats who have previously cosponsored the Life at Conception Act have done the same, including current cosponsor Reps. Michelle Steel of California and past cosponsor David Schweikert of Arizona.
https://www.businessinsider.com/house-republicans-life-at-conception-ivf-exception-2024-2

Oh boy, I am contending with a genius. No kidding Sherlock, it is not in the DSM. Ever hear of satire? Street language? And I will no longer provide anything to a libtard. It doesn't pay to waste my time. Why? Because liberals (lib) are retarded (tard) hence libtard. The tard part means you do not learn no matter the topic. And proof? Even if it is the proof such as looking at the prices of groceries. A libtard will tell you it is to improve the economy. Hence libtard. Got it yet? Trust me junior, you couldn't shine my shoes in an intellectual capacity!

Agreed, we had to hold our 1st ammendment rights or be canceled, abused, ganged up on and that is not happening any more. We had enough of the libtard 666 beast. And like I said in another post, I escaped Communist NY to come to America! 1776 is near! But here is the difference between normal and libtard. Obama is predicting a civil war. Why? Because the libtard sheeple will follow blindly. He wants us fighting against each other. Keep our eyes off the damage they are doing. A conservative says why is this miscreant correct? We need a Revolutionary war if anything. The government is our enemy, not our neighbors. Libtards don't know the difference. They cannot think beyond CNN. See what happens.

I am ashamed to be a citizen the same country as a subhuman like you. (Here is where you tell me to go to Russia). If a term is satire or street language, then it is not the term for a "mental disease". It is just the spouting of a clever child.

"liberals (lib) are retarded (tard)". Those with a subnormal intelligence, are always very touchy about those with a supernormal intelligence. It must be painfui, PA Patriot, to be unable to understand anything beyond tying your shoes. You perhaps are not aware that that most university professors are liberals. The right-wing has been complaining about that fact for years. It's your turn now to tell me that academia is full of idiots, and provide all sorts of links to sketchy sites which prove that.

It must be even more painful for you to realize that your incel condition is permanent.