I find it disgusting.. (Page 11): any particular point in the 98 pages of MN law that you would like to comment on??? The overview I am a little bit familiar with,, what is your point...

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

America 1 wrote:

illegal br Synonyms of illegal br : not according ... (show quote)

any particular point in the 98 pages of MN law that you would like to comment on???

The overview I am a little bit familiar with,, what is your point with it?

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

permafrost wrote:

And by US law, people can present themselves to any Port of Entry and/or any duty officer and they can then apply for Asylum...

You want some change in the law? Kick you rep in the butt and tell hem/her/it to get to work.. that is all we need, some work put in by the orange side, give up on the fat criminal and learn to govern, it is supposed to be the job they are paid the big bucks to do..

Wanting a better life is NOT a reason for asylum.. My parents wanted better life for my sister and I, so we applied and did everything by the book.. We came here LEGALLY!!!

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

proud republican wrote:

Wanting a better life is NOT a reason for asylum.. My parents wanted better life for my sister and I, so we applied and did everything by the book.. We came here LEGALLY!!!

Correct, someone just posted a summery and that had a short part on asylum and how to get, how to lose it and your are very correct, wanting a better life has no part in it.. and I think that regardless what they are told by the coyotes who bring them, most of the people know very well they need a real reason to gain asylum..

Justice101

proud republican wrote:

Wanting a better life is NOT a reason for asylum.. My parents wanted better life for my sister and I, so we applied and did everything by the book.. We came here LEGALLY!!!

That's right Proud. The DemocRats want to fast-track asylum claims so that millions of illegals here in the US are given amnesty and a shorter route to citizenship and voting. The bipartisan border bill would have provisions to pay lawyers who assist (teach illegals what to say) in their asylum claims of "persecution or fear of persecution" and being able to remain in the U.S. without fear of deportation.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Justice101 wrote:

That's right Proud. The DemocRats want to fast-track asylum claims so that millions of illegals here in the US are given amnesty and a shorter route to citizenship and voting. The bipartisan border bill would have provisions to pay lawyers who assist (teach illegals what to say) in their asylum claims of "persecution or fear of persecution" and being able to remain in the U.S. without fear of deportation.

The question was asked if they want Biden to be reelected as President or they want Trump.. Of course they said they want BIDEN to be reelected.. Hmmm I wonder why... :

Justice101

proud republican wrote:

The question was asked if they want Biden to be reelected as President or they want Trump.. Of course they said they want BIDEN to be reelected.. Hmmm I wonder why... :

They were all given tee shirts that read "Biden Please Let Us In".

debeda

permafrost wrote:

And by US law, people can present themselves to any Port of Entry and/or any duty officer and they can then apply for Asylum...

You want some change in the law? Kick you rep in the butt and tell hem/her/it to get to work.. that is all we need, some work put in by the orange side, give up on the fat criminal and learn to govern, it is supposed to be the job they are paid the big bucks to do..

Sadly, they come over whenever and wherever they want

debeda

proud republican wrote:

Wanting a better life is NOT a reason for asylum.. My parents wanted better life for my sister and I, so we applied and did everything by the book.. We came here LEGALLY!!!

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

debeda

permafrost wrote:

Correct, someone just posted a summery and that had a short part on asylum and how to get, how to lose it and your are very correct, wanting a better life has no part in it.. and I think that regardless what they are told by the coyotes who bring them, most of the people know very well they need a real reason to gain asylum..

AGREED

Cornflakes Loc: Texas

permafrost wrote:

why in the world would even an orange dweb think hiring more border personnel is a stupid idea? and how would you want the funding for??

Really; how about using them possible new border agents to enforce border security with the laws already in place; the funding you speak of should be spent to that purpose and not for processing asylum claims or hiring more agents for that purpose and yes that’s dumb as calling migrants undocumented Americans 🤠

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Cornflakes wrote:

Really; how about using them possible new border agents to enforce border security with the laws already in place; the funding you speak of should be spent to that purpose and not for processing asylum claims or hiring more agents for that purpose and yes that’s dumb as calling migrants undocumented Americans 🤠

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Cornflakes wrote:

Really; how about using them possible new border agents to enforce border security with the laws already in place; the funding you speak of should be spent to that purpose and not for processing asylum claims or hiring more agents for that purpose and yes that’s dumb as calling migrants undocumented Americans 🤠

You seem to forgetting the numerus comments about how the current job is not getting done.. so do you want different laws. or more staff, maybe more cameras etc..

Just what do you think should be done?

Opps wrong MEME... oh well.. it is good..

debeda

Cornflakes wrote:

Really; how about using them possible new border agents to enforce border security with the laws already in place; the funding you speak of should be spent to that purpose and not for processing asylum claims or hiring more agents for that purpose and yes that’s dumb as calling migrants undocumented Americans 🤠

👍👍👍🤗🤗🤗🤗

Cowpoke

Funny how an entire summer of insurrection by BLM, ANTIFA, and other far left groups was called “Mostly peaceful protests” as stores were looted, law enforcement personnel were injured, and buildings burned while being completely ignored by elected officials. The Mostly Peaceful Protestors had shirts, signs and other paraphernalia as well.
Didn’t hear about any shootings on the part if the January 6 protestors, also noticed a complete absence of looting, burning buildings and the like. It is curious indeed to see January 6 called an insurrection when the entire summer of riots, looting and anarchy in multiple cities was not.

debeda

Cowpoke wrote:

Funny how an entire summer of insurrection by BLM,... (show quote)

Well said!👍👍👍👍👍