Not my point dipstick. My point was there’s no evidence to start with. Frivolous suit.
The judge and Prosecutor had a previous relationship which wasn’t disclosed in discovery. Using your definition of slander anyone who has a negative comment about anyone else should be sued. If you were honest, which you’re not. You’d admit this case and charge stinks.
facts matter wrote:
Apparently you don't know as much as you think. In New York, they have the Adult Survivors Act, which created a one-year window for the revival of otherwise time-barred civil claims arising out of sexual offenses committed against people who were 18 or older at the time of the conduct. It has been extended several times. that caovered the sexual assault claim. The defamation was trump questioning her integrity as a writer which caused lost oppertunities, and thus, loss of income. And after losing the first suit the DUMBASS continued his defamatory rhetoric, leading to a second trial. And according to people in the court, he acted like the jackass he is and apparently the jury didn't like it. Trial #3 can't be far behind!
Apparently you don't know as much as you think. In... (
show quote)