Killing an opponent might be ok...
Blade_Runner wrote:
Apparently you don't understand very much at all.
Reality isn't on your radar.
The females on the right are all voting for democrats.
Don’t tell their hubbys .
This is what explains their shortage of votes.
All of their wives voted for democrats.
Aha !
They only got half of the votes they thought they would. They though these votes were stolen , too funny!
Too Funny !!!!
American Vet wrote:
Correct. He wants what is best for America and that bothers a lot of folks. He is brash, a brawler, and fights back - something the Republicans are all too often afraid to do.
Do I ‘like’ him? Not especially - but I like what he is trying to do.
The idiocy infecting the Democratic Party is just insane - that’s what might ultimately destroy America.
And fools like you contribute to the idiocy.
I can see the insanity you speak of. It is not all liberals.
I can see insanity in Republican policy. It too is not all republicans
An advantage of geography.
The insanity you see in the left I am more tolerant of. Live and let live.
The insanity I see on the right is the need to control and you might agree with that but it goes against my hippy roots.
That you like what he will do is scary.
American Vet wrote:
Correct. He wants what is best for America and that bothers a lot of folks. He is brash, a brawler, and fights back - something the Republicans are all too often afraid to do.
Do I ‘like’ him? Not especially - but I like what he is trying to do.
The idiocy infecting the Democratic Party is just insane - that’s what might ultimately destroy America.
And fools like you contribute to the idiocy.
He fights for himself,not for us or the US
RascalRiley wrote:
I can see the insanity you speak of. It is not all liberals.
I can see insanity in Republican policy. It too is not all republicans
An advantage of geography.
The insanity you see in the left I am more tolerant of. Live and let live.
The insanity I see on the right is the need to control and you might agree with that but it goes against my hippy roots.
That you like what he will do is scary.
Inane rant with nothing of substance. About typical for you.
American Vet wrote:
Inane rant with nothing of substance. About typical for you.
Must have gone over your head.
RascalRiley wrote:
Must have gone over you head.
Not a bit. I correctly identified it as an inane rant from someone unable to control their psychiatric problems.
tomhoff24 wrote:
Yes,can we get a cognizant point from anyone that supports Trump?
Guess you need to learn how to read,
NotMAGA wrote:
Do any MAGAts have a cogent argument as to why they believe this just fine and in line with our laws and Constitution? It would be interesting to have them explain their position.
Fwiw, this was just one of Trump's attorneys' points. The judges haven't ruled on his claim of "immunity" yet.
If you go back during Obama yrs when they investigated I forget what they call it but they sold a bunch of guns to cartel they ended up killing several border patrol agents with those guns. He used this presidential immunity and poof all his problems went away. SO BACK WITH THE DOUBLE STANDARD AGAIN
NotMAGA
Loc: Upstate NY - in a very red county
You're referring to "Fast and Furious" I believe, the sting operation in which our DOJ allowed automatic weapons to be sold south of the border in the hope of catching the gunrunners (which they eventually did).
ONE border patrol agent was killed in a shootout in the AZ desert.
Not sure how this pertains to what Trump did on Jan. 6 and the runup to that day.
Sting operations happen every day in law enforcement.
A US President inciting Americans to attack elected officials at our seat of government is a violation of his oath of office to preserve and protect our Constitution.
The example given by the judge yesterday was - "So you're saying a President could order Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival and could only be arrested and prosecuted if he was first impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate?"
...to which Trump's lawyer gave a qualified 'yes.'
It will be interesting to see how they decide that question of unlimited presidential immunity hypothesized by the Trump team. I know what my answer would be...
"Are you effing kidding?!?!?"
NotMAGA wrote:
A US President inciting Americans to attack elected officials at our seat of government is a violation of his oath of office to preserve and protect our Constitution.
BS - A false narrative the leftist continue to push.
NotMAGA
Loc: Upstate NY - in a very red county
The Jan.6 Committee report contains all the info you would need to understand why it was EXACTLY that - but you'll never read it.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.