dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

BOMBSHELL: 200 Undercover FBI Assets at US Capitol on Jan. 6, Congressman Estimates
Rob Bluey / @RobertBluey / January 08, 2024



A member of Congress investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, protest at the U.S. Capitol estimates the FBI had 200 undercover assets both inside and outside the building.

“We believe that there were easily 200 FBI undercover assets operating in the crowd, outside the Capitol, embedded into groups that entered the Capitol or provoked entry of the Capitol,” Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., said.

Higgins appeared on the Tucker Carlson Network for an interview that aired Saturday, the third anniversary of the day now commonly known as J6. He’s among the few elected Republicans still questioning the official media narrative about the day’s events.

“Given the scope of the operation and the number of doors where entry was allowed or even encouraged—and the number of people that were actually outside the Capitol and that entered—we believe 200 [is a] conservative number,” Higgins said of his estimate.

Carlson reacted with alarm.

“It’s shocking what you’re saying and confirms everyone’s worst suspicions about this,” Carlson told Higgins. “It’s clearly true.”

Ep. 61 This the smartest, best informed account of what actually happened on January 6th. pic.twitter.com/U9yCWRVJSd

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) January 6, 2024
Based on the evidence he’s reviewed, Higgins said FBI assets worked with the local Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Police Department and U.S. Capitol Police. The assets were dressed as supporters of then-President Donald Trump inside the Capitol, “because those were the guys that knew their way around the Capitol.”

FBI Director Christopher Wray has refused to answer questions about undercover FBI assets on Jan. 6, telling Higgins at a congressional hearing, “You should not read anything into my decision not to share information on confidential human sources.”

In remarks about the Jan. 6 anniversary, Attorney General Merrick Garland boasted Friday that more than 1,250 individuals have been charged for their involvement, with more than 890 convicted.

“Since the Jan. 6 attack, the Justice Department has engaged in what has become one of the largest and most complex and resource-intensive investigations in our history,” Garland said. “Our work continues.”

President Joe Biden used the anniversary of Jan. 6 to attack Trump in his first campaign speech of 2024.

“It was on that day that we nearly lost America, lost it all,” Biden said Friday at a speech in Valley Forge, Pennsylvania.

Carlson opened his interview with Higgins by criticizing “professional liars” who have presented a one-sided narrative about what happened on that day. Higgins, who worked in law enforcement before his election to Congress, has led the charge after being frustrated by the official congressional committee that investigated Jan. 6, which was stacked with anti-Trump lawmakers. Ever since Republicans reclaimed control of the House in 2023, members like Higgins have pressed for answers.

For example, as a member of Congress familiar with the U.S. Capitol, Higgins said it’s unfathomable to believe that everyday Americans in Washington, D.C., would know how to navigate the building without help.

“There’s no way they can come in some random door that gets opened and then get their way directly to Statuary [Hall] or the House chamber or the Senate chamber. It’s just not possible,” Higgins explained. “The FBI assets that were dressed as Trump supporters that were inside the Capitol were there, I believe, and evidence indicates that they were there to specifically wave in the Trump supporters that had gathered outside the Capitol.”


Tucker Carlson said Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., is “one of the only” members of Congress asking tough questions about what really happened on Jan. 6, 2021. (Photo: Tucker Carlson Network)
Higgins told Carlson these undercover assets guided protesters “directly to the areas where the FBI, the DOJ, and the Deep State actors” would later be able to implicate them for arrest and prosecution.

When pressed on who could have orchestrated such a massive operation, Higgins put the blame on not on a single person but rather a combination of anti-Trump actors working in cahoots with Democrats.

“It’s a complex web of FBI assets across the country that can be activated. So, if you have authority at some of the highest levels in the FBI, it doesn’t take much,” Higgins said. He added that those who planned it were “the faction within the FBI and within our intelligence services that would coordinate with the most extreme liberal factions within the Democrat Party that were desperate to keep Trump out of office.”

>>> What the Media Isn’t Telling You About Jan. 6

Higgins identified the 200 undercover assets as confidential informants, registered informants, nonregistered informants, and voluntary informants.

Ultimately, Higgins said, they had a goal of tarnishing not just Trump’s reputation but also the people associated with the Make America Great Again movement.

“Their objective was to destroy the entire MAGA movement,” Higgins said, “to forever stain the patriotic fervor that was associated with the America First MAGA movement that had won in 2016 and we believe won again in 2020.”


Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., talks with Micki Witthoeft, mother of Ashli Babbitt, who was killed by Capitol Police on J6. Higgins met her during a news conference outside the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 12, 2023. (Photo: Tom Williams/Getty Images)
Higgins called the FBI’s involvement “conspiratorial corruption,” and said it predated Jan. 6 for many months when FBI assets were engaged in online forums of Americans who questioned COVID-19 restrictions and the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.

“I’m following the evidence, and to my horror, it implicates our FBI at the highest level,” Higgins told Carlson. “A conspiracy within our government at the highest level to set the stage for a compromised election cycle in 2020. And then the actions that took place on J4, 5, and 6, and then the criminal investigation, arrest, and prosecution of Americans that they were able to entrap.”

Higgins, who was first elected in 2016 to represent southwestern Louisiana, is now pressing House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to release more information, beyond just video footage, about Jan. 6. He said the only true way to uncover what really happened is for the American people to have access.

“He has a responsibility to fully release that data,” Higgins said of Johnson. “And then the American people will see for themselves what some of us have already learned, to our horror, to be true.”

Ray Epps, in the red Trump hat, center, gestures to a line of law enforcement officers, as people gather on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Kent Nishimura/Getty Images)

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Doesn’t matter too Democrats if the FBI came forward and admitted this, they’d still say they weren’t there.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

Feds sued over Capitol cop's 'murder' of Ashli Babbitt on J6
Wrongful death, assault and battery, negligence charged
Bob Unruh By Bob Unruh
Published January 5, 2024 at 2:40pm

A lawsuit charging wrongful death, assault and battery and negligence has been filed against the U.S. government by a legal team acting on behalf of the family and estate of Ashli Babbitt, the Air Force veteran who was shot and killed inside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

The shooter was identified months later as then-Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd.

The complaint, brought by Judicial Watch, explains the details of what happened that day:

Ashli loved her country and wanted to show her support for President Trump’s America First policies and to see and hear the president speak live while he remained in office. Ashli did not go to Washington as part of a group or for any unlawful or nefarious purpose. She was there to exercise what she believed were her God-given, American liberties and freedoms.

After the rally, Ashli, like a great many other patriotic Americans attending the rally, walked to the Capitol peacefully, a distance of approximately 1.5 miles. Two undercover Metropolitan Police Department officers followed close behind Ashli as she climbed the stairs to the West Terrace. Ashli entered the Capitol on the Senate side long after others had done so. Once inside, Ashli encountered a female Capitol Police officer, who directed her to walk south toward the House side. Ashli complied, walking alone through the Capitol and ultimately arriving at the hallway outside the main door to the House chamber, where demonstrators had gathered. From there, Ashli walked by herself east, along the hallway outside the House chamber, then turned south, reaching the hallway outside the Speaker’s Lobby at the southeast corner of the Capitol.

The shooting occurred at the east entrance to the Speaker’s Lobby. After demonstrators filled the hallway outside the lobby, two individuals in the crowded, tightly packed hallway struck and dislodged the glass panels in the lobby doors and the right door sidelight. Lt. Byrd, who is a USCP commander and was the incident commander for the House on January 6, 2021, shot Ashli on sight as she raised herself up into the opening of the right door sidelight. Lt. Byrd later confessed that he shot Ashli before seeing her hands or assessing her intentions or even identifying her as female. Ashli was unarmed. Her hands were up in the air, empty, and in plain view of Lt. Byrd and other officers in the lobby.

The complaint charges that Babbitt "was ambushed" and witnesses at the scene yelled at the officer, "You just murdered her."

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND's Email News Alerts!

And it charges Byrd never was charged or disciplined for her death.

Babbitt, 35, was from San Diego where she and her husband ran a successful business. She traveled to Washington for the Women for America First rally at that time.

It also charges that Byrd was not in uniform, did not identify himself as an officer and was hidden from Babbitt when he fired the shot that killed her.

The complaint explains, "Ashli remained conscious for minutes or longer after being shot by Lt. Byrd. Ashli experienced extreme pain, suffering, mental anguish, and intense fear before slipping into pre-terminal unconsciousness." And it said the medical examiner determined that the manner of death was homicide.

Further, because of Byrd's history, his government employers "knew or should have known that Lt. Byrd was prone to behave in a dangerous or otherwise incompetent manner."

It points out in 2021 he left a loaded Glock 22 handgun unattended in the bathroom at the Capitol Visitor Center, his "police powers" had been revoked on several occasions for failing to meet firearms qualifications requirements and for shooting into a moving vehicle occupied by teens or juveniles.

The case seeks "the full and just amount of Thirty Million Dollars ($30,000,000), plus costs and interest according to law, and any and all further relief to which plaintiffs may be justly entitled."

The case is pending in federal court in California.

Tom Fitten, Judicial Watch's chief, said, "The only homicide on January 6 was the unlawful shooting death of Ashli Babbitt. Her homicide by Lt. Byrd is a scandal beyond belief. This historic lawsuit seeks a measure of justice and government accountability for Ashli’s wrongful death."

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

I hope that racist punk of a cop burns but we know he won’t.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

Prosecutor claims Trump could 'incite' supporters to 'kill lawmakers' without penalty
Democrat prosecutor unleashes end-times rhetoric in court case
By Bob Unruh
Published January 5, 2024 at 4:12pm


Prosecutors use rhetoric and hyperbole to convince juries – or the public as the case may be – of the vile, evil propensity for wrongdoing in those they've accused.

But Jack Smith, the prosecutor hand-picked by the Biden administration to bring one of its cases, over Jan. 6, 2021, against President Trump, appears to have gone over the edge.

He's charging that there's nothing the U.S. could do if a president, during a State of the Union address, incited followers to kill opposing politicians.

Smith has outlined the details of his wild claims in a court filing.

He said, "The nation would have no recourse to deter a president from inciting his supporters during a State of the Union address to kill opposing lawmakers … to ensure that he remains in office unlawfully."

BREAKING: Jack Smith warns if Trump is re-elected he could use the State of the Union address to incite his supporters to kill opposing politicians pic.twitter.com/q0nrGYlbnw

— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) January 4, 2024


NBC explained the Smith comments are in a "new filing" and outline "what could happen if Donald Trump is granted immunity in the Jan. 6 coup case."

Alternet went further in its reporting.

It explained that Smith also charged that a president could commit any hypothetical crime, "from ordering the FBI to fabricate evidence against political opponents, ordering a U.S. military assassination or selling nuclear secrets to a foreign country."

Smith is trying to defeat the provision for presidential immunity claimed by President Trump for events while he was in office.

"In each of these scenarios, the president could assert that he was simply executing the laws; or communicating with the Department of Justice; or discharging his powers as commander-in-chief; or engaging in foreign diplomacy," Smith's filing said. "Under the defendant’s framework, the nation would have no recourse to deter a president from inciting his supporters during a State of the Union address to kill opposing lawmakers – thereby hamstringing any impeachment proceeding – to ensure that he remains in office unlawfully."

The case is pending before Judge Tanya Chutkan, who previously publicly condemned President Trump and suggested he should be in jail, after she refused requests that she pass the case along to someone without a bias.

That issue of immunity now is pending before the Supreme Court, and Chutkan halted deadlines in the case until that's resolved.

That action, however, prompted a request by Trump that Smith be held in contempt of court.

The issue is that Smith has continued to file political loaded comments with the court, even though Chutkan suspended those filing schedules.

The problem is that when a prosecutor files a politically loaded charge, it is incumbent upon a defendant to respond.

The Daily Caller News Foundation explained, "Smith has continued to file documents on the suspended deadlines, which Trump’s lawyers alleged in a 15-page filing violates the court’s 'clear, straightforward, and unambiguous' stay order.

"In this manner, the prosecutors seek to weaponize the Stay to spread political propaganda, knowing that President Trump would not fully respond because the Court relieved him of the burdens of litigation during the Stay,” they wrote. “Worse, the prosecutors have announced their intention to continue this partisan-driven misconduct indefinitely, effectively converting this Court’s docket into an arm of the Biden Campaign.”

New: Trump’s legal team seeks to hold special counsel Jack Smith in contempt for purportedly violating the court’s order staying proceedings in district court.
— Anna Bower (@AnnaBower) January 4, 2024

Sew_What

If there had been 200 FBI agents, they would have kicked your ass...too funny...you lost, again.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

I wasn't there. So, we'll never know.