January 6th prisoners.
permafrost wrote:
that seems very unlikely Corn, your post seems very shaky and I would think the court in Colorado would be very knowledgeable of the constitution, amendments and any repeal that applied.
They are very knowledgeable. They wrote airtight reasoning for removing him from the ballot.
They also knew that he'd appeal
He'll attempt to play out the clock, as usual.
When his "presidential immunity" is denied again in court, he'll appeal again, as usual.
Ad nauseum
federally indicted mattoid wrote:
They are very knowledgeable. They wrote airtight reasoning for removing him from the ballot.
They also knew that he'd appeal
He'll attempt to play out the clock, as usual.
When his "presidential immunity" is denied again in court, he'll appeal again, as usual.
Ad nauseum
I would venture to say that balloon with their air tight reasoning is just about to be popped - remember the baker - these same individuals felt great about
Their decision until they were duly chastised and embarrassed
federally indicted mattoid wrote:
They are very knowledgeable. They wrote airtight reasoning for removing him from the ballot.
They also knew that he'd appeal
He'll attempt to play out the clock, as usual.
When his "presidential immunity" is denied again in court, he'll appeal again, as usual.
Ad nauseum
Your just going to argue party line, regardless. What a putz
jack sequim wa wrote:
Your just going to argue party line, regardless. What a putz
Yeah sure.
I want every president to break laws and be immune from prosecution.
federally indicted mattoid wrote:
Yeah sure.
I want every president to break laws and be immune from prosecution.
But then there is always a dipstick incapable of understanding our judicial corruption, using the 14th amendment (written for free slaves).
Incapable of arguments based in justified reason
jack sequim wa wrote:
But then there is always a dipstick incapable of understanding our judicial corruption, using the 14th amendment (written for free slaves).
Incapable of arguments based in justified reason
?
You need to read it better.
Talks about an officer who's sworn to uphold the constitution who's engaged in insurrection being disqualified.
federally indicted mattoid wrote:
Yeah sure.
I want every president to break laws and be immune from prosecution.
If that were anywhere near true why aren’t you railing on the Clintons or Biden for weaponizing the DOJ
federally indicted mattoid wrote:
?
You need to read it better.
Talks about an officer who's sworn to uphold the constitution who's engaged in insurrection being disqualified.
Fortunately for the unread, our forefathers had scribes record speeches and we have copies of letters they had written.
But then, why listen to our forefathers intent, kinda like leftist ignore their speeches and letters regarding the 2nd amendment, doesn't fit the agenda. And unlike you Rheumatoid, I provide references that are not some rag opinion piece.
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/14th-amendmentPassed by Congress June 13, 1866, and ratified July 9, 1868, the 14th Amendment extended liberties and rights granted by the Bill of Rights to formerly enslaved people.
Hydro wrote:
If that were anywhere near true why aren’t you railing on the Clintons or Biden for weaponizing the DOJ
Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Other Rights
Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
permafrost wrote:
Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Other Rights
Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Other R... (
show quote)
No insurrection occurred. Ergo, meaningless post from the OPP village idiot.
American Vet wrote:
No insurrection occurred. Ergo, meaningless post from the OPP village idiot.
do not mince and twist/omit words.. are you able to comprehend that Jan 6th was an attempt to overturn the election and to kill elected reps of our country? The law may not allow the term insurrection to be used or charged but even the most servile trump lover must know in the deepest corner of their gizzard that any attempt to unlawfully overturn a government is at it most basic level an insurrection...
permafrost wrote:
do not mince and twist/omit words.. are you able to comprehend that Jan 6th was an attempt to overturn the election and to kill elected reps of our country? The law may not allow the term insurrection to be used or charged but even the most servile trump lover must know in the deepest corner of their gizzard that any attempt to unlawfully overturn a government is at it most basic level an insurrection...
I now understand. Because you believe something it is 'right', the law/DoJ/FBI has nothing to do with it.
ROTFLMAO
Corn Pop, you are such a maroon. Thanks for being the OPP clown.
permafrost wrote:
Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Other Rights
Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Other R... (
show quote)
You just like all the other Hters of Trump will get educated shortly whe the US SC overturned Oloraxo’s stab T fame - their last stab didn’t go well either when they wer chastised publically and overturned in the case of the baker who refused to go against his Christian beliefs and refused to create a cake for a homosexual wedding - just wait for it perm
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.