Bigmac495 wrote:
That will work! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Now this could be a stretch for factual proof. It isn't on the issue of the Guillotines but it is an issue for obstruction of Justice, and how the Department of Justice, under Eric Holder, led ultimately by President Obama, has been compromised.
I present testimony for special counsel for the IRS Scandal by Jay Sekulow, from the American Center For Law and Justice, as Evidence that the Executive Department, more specifically the Department of Justice has been compromised, as a result of this compromise, the Executive Department cannot be trusted, in a court of law, until its leaders are brought to Justice by independent counsel. This must be done by Congress.
May I remind you that obstruction of justice is an impeachable offense. The evidence of obstruction is here at
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/jay-sekulow-congressional-testimony-irs-scandal-request-for-special-counsel.pdf Now, I am not a lawyer, but when the Head attorney for the American Center for Law and Justice, states in his testimony that,
"The emails that I have referenced and included with my written statement for the record directly link the DOJ as potential co-conspirators in the crime that is the focus of its investigation.
The DOJ has been compromised.
The DOJ no longer has the credibility to argue that a Special Counsel should not be appointed. I am well aware of the standard for assigning a Special Counsel.
Because of the separation of powers principals established in the U.S. Constitution, federal law enforcement is an executive function. As such, the power to appoint a Special Counsel to conduct criminal investigations and prosecutions on behalf of the United States lies solely with the Attorney General. Both H.Res. 565 and the joint letter sent to Attorney General Holder accurately state the standards for the appointment of a Special Counsel. These standards are found in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which states that a Special Counsel should be appointed when an Attorney General determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and; that
investigation or prosecution would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and that under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter.
It should be clear that all of these elements have been met. We already know that a criminal investigation is warranted. Indeed, the Attorney General launched just such an investigation last
year. The conflict of interest is also obvious. In fact, there are multiple conflicts."--Jay Sekulow, Attorney for the American Center For Law and Justice
and in conclusion Jay testifies, "The targeting of any American based upon their personal beliefs or freedoms of association is
repugnant to the Constitution. Americans are outraged, and its time for a real investigation. We need to know what happened. Those responsible for this scandal must be brought to justice.
In this case, the IRS and the DOJ have proven that they are completely compromised on this investigation.
The Constitution requires the President to faithfully execute the laws of the United States by defending the First Amendment rights of all American citizens. If my clients are going to find
justice, we must have a Special Counsel."--Jay Sekulow.
This thus, shows conspiracy and obstruction, between the IRS and the Department of Justice. Justice is thus, compromised. If the Department of Justice is truly guilty of conspiracy and obstruction here, then what other areas have be compromised by the Obama Administration?
Which may make the Guillotine issue, probable. Interesting huh?