Systemic Voter Fraud in America
Nov 17, 2023 10:12:02 #
Systemic Voter Fraud in America
By: Amil Imani
November 17, 2023
The issue of voter fraud and election integrity dominated much of Trump’s presidency, with many of his supporters raising concerns about the credibility of the electoral system. Well, voter fraud appears to have metastasized and is now out of control. We saw that in Arizona’s gubernatorial race, and we see it all across America.
In recent years, concerns about voter fraud have grown significantly, with many individuals asserting that there are systemic issues within the American electoral system.
One striking example cited by those raising concerns about voter fraud is the Kentucky gubernatorial election, which looked like a close race, with the Democratic nominee, Andy Beshear, defeating Republican incumbent Matt Bevin by just over 5,000 votes, or 0.37%. This made it the closest gubernatorial election in Kentucky since 1899 by votes and the closest ever by percentage.
The discrepancy in the voting patterns in this election raises eyebrows and sparks suspicions among those alleging voter fraud. While Kentucky Republicans voted overwhelmingly for their party’s candidates for other statewide offices, such as Attorney General and Secretary of State, they simultaneously chose a Democrat for the governor’s position. This divergent behavior among voters, especially within the same party, can appear perplexing and contradictory.
The core argument here is that when voters consistently support one political party across multiple offices, they are expected to do the same for the gubernatorial race. However, the outcome of the Kentucky gubernatorial election needed to align with this pattern, raising concerns about the integrity of the voting process. Such inconsistencies in voting behavior could indicate manipulation or irregularities in the election system, as it is unusual for voters to exhibit such discrepancies in their choices.
The assertion that elections are rigged is rooted in a belief that nefarious forces may be at play and that a coordinated effort could be behind the inconsistent voting outcomes. It is, therefore, crucial to consider the possibility that allegations of rigged elections could have a basis in reality, thus warranting a thorough investigation.
The close relationships between prominent politicians, such as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and high-ranking members of both the Republican and Democrat parties in Kentucky suggest a hidden agenda. Even if we take it for granted that political alliances are common in politics, it is not unreasonable to wonder if such connections could influence election outcomes. A closer look at these alliances and their impact on elections is justified.
This alignment or collaboration between high-ranking members of both the Republican and Democrat Parties suggests that they might be working together with shared interests rather than representing distinct political ideologies. The “hidden agenda” here is that these politicians, despite belonging to different parties, are collaborating behind the scenes to achieve specific goals.
Claims of suspect voting machine issues in Kentucky are not new. They have persisted for years, fueling suspicions that the electoral system may be compromised. The essence of these suspicions lies in the potential vulnerabilities or issues related to the use of voting machines and how they can be rigged to favor “certain results.” Therefore, we need to assert more that there is this need for comprehensive scrutiny and an impartial investigation to determine the integrity of the voting process. The concern here is that if these machines can be rigged, they are turning the “accuracy and fairness of elections” into a farce drama.
The practice of split-ticket voting, where individuals choose candidates from different parties for different offices, may be more complex than it seems. Moreover, the nature of these splits, where voters make different choices for various offices, is a sign of manipulation within the electoral process and doesn’t reflect the diverse political opinions of the electorate. The varying outcomes in other races may be more indicative of foul play than genuine voter choices.
The Heritage Foundation has posted a long list of election fraud cases in the US.
Allegations of systemic voter fraud in America, exemplified by cases such as the Kentucky elections, deserve serious consideration. While some may dismiss these concerns, it is essential to recognize that the electoral system’s rectitude is paramount. Investigating these claims and addressing potential issues will help safeguard the democratic process and ensure the public’s trust in elections remains intact. By taking these concerns seriously, we can work to protect the sanctity of our democratic institutions.
https://newswithviews.com/systemic-voter-fraud-in-america/
By: Amil Imani
November 17, 2023
The issue of voter fraud and election integrity dominated much of Trump’s presidency, with many of his supporters raising concerns about the credibility of the electoral system. Well, voter fraud appears to have metastasized and is now out of control. We saw that in Arizona’s gubernatorial race, and we see it all across America.
In recent years, concerns about voter fraud have grown significantly, with many individuals asserting that there are systemic issues within the American electoral system.
One striking example cited by those raising concerns about voter fraud is the Kentucky gubernatorial election, which looked like a close race, with the Democratic nominee, Andy Beshear, defeating Republican incumbent Matt Bevin by just over 5,000 votes, or 0.37%. This made it the closest gubernatorial election in Kentucky since 1899 by votes and the closest ever by percentage.
The discrepancy in the voting patterns in this election raises eyebrows and sparks suspicions among those alleging voter fraud. While Kentucky Republicans voted overwhelmingly for their party’s candidates for other statewide offices, such as Attorney General and Secretary of State, they simultaneously chose a Democrat for the governor’s position. This divergent behavior among voters, especially within the same party, can appear perplexing and contradictory.
The core argument here is that when voters consistently support one political party across multiple offices, they are expected to do the same for the gubernatorial race. However, the outcome of the Kentucky gubernatorial election needed to align with this pattern, raising concerns about the integrity of the voting process. Such inconsistencies in voting behavior could indicate manipulation or irregularities in the election system, as it is unusual for voters to exhibit such discrepancies in their choices.
The assertion that elections are rigged is rooted in a belief that nefarious forces may be at play and that a coordinated effort could be behind the inconsistent voting outcomes. It is, therefore, crucial to consider the possibility that allegations of rigged elections could have a basis in reality, thus warranting a thorough investigation.
The close relationships between prominent politicians, such as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and high-ranking members of both the Republican and Democrat parties in Kentucky suggest a hidden agenda. Even if we take it for granted that political alliances are common in politics, it is not unreasonable to wonder if such connections could influence election outcomes. A closer look at these alliances and their impact on elections is justified.
This alignment or collaboration between high-ranking members of both the Republican and Democrat Parties suggests that they might be working together with shared interests rather than representing distinct political ideologies. The “hidden agenda” here is that these politicians, despite belonging to different parties, are collaborating behind the scenes to achieve specific goals.
Claims of suspect voting machine issues in Kentucky are not new. They have persisted for years, fueling suspicions that the electoral system may be compromised. The essence of these suspicions lies in the potential vulnerabilities or issues related to the use of voting machines and how they can be rigged to favor “certain results.” Therefore, we need to assert more that there is this need for comprehensive scrutiny and an impartial investigation to determine the integrity of the voting process. The concern here is that if these machines can be rigged, they are turning the “accuracy and fairness of elections” into a farce drama.
The practice of split-ticket voting, where individuals choose candidates from different parties for different offices, may be more complex than it seems. Moreover, the nature of these splits, where voters make different choices for various offices, is a sign of manipulation within the electoral process and doesn’t reflect the diverse political opinions of the electorate. The varying outcomes in other races may be more indicative of foul play than genuine voter choices.
The Heritage Foundation has posted a long list of election fraud cases in the US.
Allegations of systemic voter fraud in America, exemplified by cases such as the Kentucky elections, deserve serious consideration. While some may dismiss these concerns, it is essential to recognize that the electoral system’s rectitude is paramount. Investigating these claims and addressing potential issues will help safeguard the democratic process and ensure the public’s trust in elections remains intact. By taking these concerns seriously, we can work to protect the sanctity of our democratic institutions.
https://newswithviews.com/systemic-voter-fraud-in-america/
Nov 17, 2023 10:34:09 #
Electronic or Computer software based voting systems should be illegal.
Voting should be in person, and on paper or mechanically tabulated machines.
All vote totals should be completed by midnight on election day.
The only exceptions should be for active duty military personnel.
ALL THE PROBLEMS WOULD DISSAPPEAR
Voting should be in person, and on paper or mechanically tabulated machines.
All vote totals should be completed by midnight on election day.
The only exceptions should be for active duty military personnel.
ALL THE PROBLEMS WOULD DISSAPPEAR
Nov 17, 2023 10:48:04 #
Sonny Magoo wrote:
Electronic or Computer software based voting systems should be illegal.
Voting should be in person, and on paper or mechanically tabulated machines.
All vote totals should be completed by midnight on election day.
The only exceptions should be for active duty military personnel.
ALL THE PROBLEMS WOULD DISSAPPEAR
Voting should be in person, and on paper or mechanically tabulated machines.
All vote totals should be completed by midnight on election day.
The only exceptions should be for active duty military personnel.
ALL THE PROBLEMS WOULD DISSAPPEAR
Check out topic: How to Lose an Ally in Ten Days
Nov 17, 2023 10:57:05 #
Sonny Magoo wrote:
Electronic or Computer software based voting systems should be illegal.
Voting should be in person, and on paper or mechanically tabulated machines.
All vote totals should be completed by midnight on election day.
The only exceptions should be for active duty military personnel.
ALL THE PROBLEMS WOULD DISSAPPEAR
Voting should be in person, and on paper or mechanically tabulated machines.
All vote totals should be completed by midnight on election day.
The only exceptions should be for active duty military personnel.
ALL THE PROBLEMS WOULD DISSAPPEAR
Exactly right….. the powers that be have money for everything else. It would be so easy to do what you suggest . Voter fraud would go away 99 per cent.
Nov 17, 2023 11:00:00 #
Bruce123 wrote:
Exactly right….. the powers that be have money for everything else. It would be so easy to do what you suggest . Voter fraud would go away 99 per cent.
Nov 18, 2023 05:46:30 #
Bruce123 wrote:
Exactly right….. the powers that be have money for everything else. It would be so easy to do what you suggest . Voter fraud would go away 99 per cent.
Agree!!!
Nov 19, 2023 16:04:29 #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Systemic Voter Fraud in America br br By: Amil Im... (show quote)
Our current group of elected reps have done a fine job of pulling the wool over EVERYONES eyes haven't they??? They have done this by insuring we.. the people.. have been convinced the other side is responsible for every failure and/or broken promise these cons made to get elected (and/or should be forgiven for).. and they've done an excellent job of this. They have managed to convince their voters they can't trust anyone from the other side (to convince us to give them-our guy/side-the benefit of every doubt..) which we stupidly continue to do. Most people don't have a clue of how corrupt and self-serving most of these guys-clearly the majority of our elected reps-truly are now.. and even worse, don't understand the implications of what these cons are setting up for their future exploits and power grabs. It's obvious the 2 sides aren't really collaborating.. but noone in wash wants any changes to occur.. so they take turns playing 'good cop/bad cop' (to us) to explain/justify the garbage which they are peddling off as necessary and proper... Once you realize this-that they are intentionally avoiding the specifics and instead goading you into becoming emotionally challenged (and distracted) from what you were originally trying to accomplish/fix/reform-everything starts to fall right into place. They're doing all of it for 1 reason only-to maintain the fubar status quo the swamp has CLEARLY implemented-WHICH THEY ALL TAKE ADVANTAGE OF-as they incrementally push us farther and farther towards the acceptance of them becoming our complete and total guardians/caretakers/rulers.
LGB
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.