Exclusive: John Kelly goes on the record to confirm several disturbing stories about Trump
Oct 5, 2023 20:18:40 #
Michael10 wrote:
Submit it to court because republican and democrat appointed judges both have thrown his BS out of the courts. It's all a big lie and you are either a liar a fool or both for believing that crap.
With Kahuna, I'm betting on "both"
Oct 5, 2023 20:22:14 #
federally indicted mattoid wrote:
You're in the minority here Mmt08, but it's good to be on the side that uses facts when making decisions, even if it is the minority.
You're in the minority here Mmt08, but it's good to be on the side that uses facts when making decisions, even if it is the minority.
What about these?
170 SAR’s?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/nine-biden-family-members-who-allegedly-got-foreign-money-identified-by-house-gop/ar-AA1b0bXX
https://nypost.com/2023/05/10/nine-biden-family-members-who-allegedly-got-foreign-money-identified-by-house-gop/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jarring-two-of-joe-biden-s-grandchildren-received-unexplained-foreign-cash/ar-AA1gEFzG
Monetary benefits to Biden family members are benefits to President Joe Biden and therefore implicate him in wrongdoing, legal scholar Jonathan Turley said during Thursday’s impeachment inquiry hearing.
“Can a benefit to your family be a benefit to you?” Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) asked Turley regarding Joe Biden and his family’s alleged influence peddling. “It is,” Turley replied. Turley said Democrats claim that it must be proven that Joe Biden accepted direct money in order for him to be implicated in Biden family wrongdoing. The legal scholar called that claim “fallacious.”
https://palmer.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/jonathan-turley-monetary-benefits-biden-family-implicate-joe-biden
Payments do not need to be paid directly to a public official to be considered a bribe, legal experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.
“There are cases in which payments made to family members can be treated as bribery of the principle if he is aware of it,” Harvard Law Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz told the DCNF in August.
Former federal prosecutor and FBI consultant Joseph Moreno told the DCNF that federal law makes it a crime “for a public official to directly or indirectly receive something of value in return for being influenced in the performance of any official act.”
https://dailycaller.com/2023/09/28/hunter-joe-biden-bribe-legal-experts/
Oct 5, 2023 20:22:21 #
Michael10 wrote:
I would not have voted different, trump is a wanna be dictator who tried his best to steal the election, fake electors and all. No way I'm voting for a guy who commits crimes against Democracy.
If you hate crimes against democracy you would never vote demoratic.
Oct 5, 2023 20:24:52 #
Michael10 wrote:
Submit it to court because republican and democrat appointed judges both have thrown his BS out of the courts. It's all a big lie and you are either a liar a fool or both for believing that crap.
Trump won the Presidency in 2020 and you know it. The whole world knows it but you and a few thousand other corrupt individuals.
Oct 5, 2023 20:25:58 #
federally indicted mattoid wrote:
Very very deep indeed.
Denial is a deep deep river.
Denial is a deep deep river.
And you can't swim but you are sinking.
Oct 5, 2023 22:17:16 #
Big Kahuna wrote:
Trump won the Presidency in 2020 and you know it. The whole world knows it but you and a few thousand other corrupt individuals.
Then do as he suggests: submit your evidence in a court of law.
Let's see YOU get laughed out of court like so many others before.
Oct 5, 2023 23:14:39 #
Now Trump has been accused of treason by 80 witnesses,who witnessed him giving a billionaire from Australia our submarine capabilities at Mara loco- hmmm and he was calling for Milly to be executed-Really???
Oct 6, 2023 02:14:08 #
Fit2BTied wrote:
Let's just for a minute accept that some of what you said might be true, because most of it is pure bovine residue. Donald Trump is a flawed man and a sinner. Uhhh...OK...so he's one of US. Were you better off when Trump was President? Or are you better off now? And, oh yeah...
I was better off with Trump....but the post you are responding to has nothing to do with Trump. The name wasn't even mentioned.
Oct 6, 2023 06:43:22 #
atkinsonsm wrote:
I responded to the OP. Trump was being bad mouthed by Kelley. Not sure what you're referring to.I was better off with Trump....but the post you are responding to has nothing to do with Trump. The name wasn't even mentioned.
Oct 6, 2023 07:42:04 #
federally indicted mattoid wrote:
Then do as he suggests: submit your evidence in a court of law.
Let's see YOU get laughed out of court like so many others before.
Let's see YOU get laughed out of court like so many others before.
These corrupt judges would not even look at all the evidence. They would just claim the perverbial "no standing" and dismiss evidence of the steal. Not only were 90 million Trump supporters stolen of free and honest elections but we were also stolen of our votes by an unjust, corrupt and unbiased judicial system. Some short ropes should be brought out so this bs never happens again but look what your team is currently doing, suppressing Trumps right to free speech and already messing with election interference before the 2024 election. You and your party are classless acts. Go home, maybe Cuba would be a good start.
Oct 6, 2023 09:02:58 #
Michael10 wrote:
I would not have voted different, trump is a wanna be dictator who tried his best to steal the election, fake electors and all. No way I'm voting for a guy who commits crimes against Democracy.
Fake electors? You meant alternative electors, right? Like we've had in previous elections...
Oct 6, 2023 09:14:55 #
Big Kahuna wrote:
If you hate crimes against democracy you would never vote demoratic.
DUH, Dems didn't attack the Capitol on Jan 6th and they aren't the people supporting the guy who did.
Oct 6, 2023 09:18:00 #
Big Kahuna wrote:
Trump won the Presidency in 2020 and you know it. The whole world knows it but you and a few thousand other corrupt individuals.
No trump didn't win the presidency, Biden won by over 7 million votes. You people are just to dense to admit it. Everyone involved in that election knows who won including trump.
Oct 6, 2023 09:19:52 #
WEBCO wrote:
Fake electors? You meant alternative electors, right? Like we've had in previous elections...
No I mean FAKE electors, people only selected by the GOP opps to help steal the election. One has already pleaded guilty and more will come.
Oct 6, 2023 09:25:41 #
American Vet wrote:
What about these? br br 170 SAR’s? br br https:/... (show quote)
Professor Jonathan Turley, you mean the guy who just testified to the house judiciary committee that there was no evidence of Biden committing a crime, man you people should try and keep up. Not doing so really makes you look stupid.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-republicans-hold-first-hearing-biden-impeachment-inquiry-rcna117657
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.