microphor wrote:
You should tell the Biden's that. Hunter and company probably still have some unreported income somewhere that no taxes were paid on. How much in penalties did he pay on that million+ he owed. Oh forgot, NOTHING, guess he got what he deserved! hahahahahaha
from NY post article...
And a “huge” factor that the Department of Justice would have looked “very favorably” upon is the fact that Hunter already paid back the money and penalties he owed in taxes last year, as part of his bid to avoid criminal charges.
Hunters gun, which he owned for 11 days..
JR-57
Loc: South Carolina
permafrost wrote:
from NY post article...
And a “huge” factor that the Department of Justice would have looked “very favorably” upon is the fact that Hunter already paid back the money and penalties he owed in taxes last year, as part of his bid to avoid criminal charges.
How convenient to omit illegally owned and illegally discarded. You turn a blind eye to everything liberal.
son of witless wrote:
An old truism.
" Don't tax you, don't tax me, tax the guy behind the tree. "
I like that and it is a new saying , I had not heard that...
JR-57
Loc: South Carolina
🙄 The saying was started in 1932. Hardly new.
permafrost wrote:
voice of a fool is all you are..
Nixon was a champion at use of the IRS and I doubt even he was the first one..
LOL
So you think it is OK for democrats to do so because someone else did?
If ignorance is bliss, you must be in Heaven.
permafrost wrote:
from NY post article...
And a “huge” factor that the Department of Justice would have looked “very favorably” upon is the fact that Hunter already paid back the money and penalties he owed in taxes last year, as part of his bid to avoid criminal charges.
Sorry that statement isn't enough. You got the amount of penalties charged? NO? Just a statement saying he part pf the two million was for penalties. Find that hared to believe. No specifics, why not?
Jim0001
Loc: originally from Tennessee, now Virginia, USA
Bad Bob wrote:
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
could
/ko͝od,kəd/
verb
past of can1.
used to indicate possibility.
"they could be right"
used in making polite requests.
"could I use the phone?"
Basics. 5B Basics = "May I" not "Could I".
Being the "genius" that you are you should recognize that:
"Could I" means am I capable.
"May I" seeks permission and means am I allowed?
permafrost wrote:
If ever we are able to choose where are taxes go, the squabbling would never end.. each of us would have are own list of what it should or should not be for..
Since we the people elect representatives to work for us, it only makes sense to let them know what we do and do not want done with our money. It's folks like you who have given those in government the idea that they know best and will not be held accountable that have us facing huge deficits due to wasteful spending on things the federal government should not even be involved in. Nice work.
microphor wrote:
Sorry that statement isn't enough. You got the amount of penalties charged? NO? Just a statement saying he part pf the two million was for penalties. Find that hared to believe. No specifics, why not?
Quote:
"Sorry that statement isn't enough. You got the amount of penalties charged? NO? Just a statement saying he part pf the two million was for penalties. Find that hared to believe. No specifics, why not?
Sorry for the spelling errors, eyes aren't what they use to be and using a cell phone to respond doesn't help. My bad!
Fit2BTied wrote:
Since we the people elect representatives to work for us, it only makes sense to let them know what we do and do not want done with our money. It's folks like you who have given those in government the idea that they know best and will not be held accountable that have us facing huge deficits due to wasteful spending on things the federal government should not even be involved in. Nice work.
It seems in your befuddled way, you are trying to say we should contact our reps..
I fully agree and have found that if I use snail mail rather then an email. I get a real responce..
both my close personal friend Amy Klobuchar and all the others do return my letters and say the good things which we all wish to hear..
The lone exception at times is my congressman, Stauber.. he at times only sends reelection material and asks for donations.. Come to think of it... all of them ask for donations..
But Yes, you make a good recommendation, but why do you imply that I am not doing that already?? I have for years.. and it is worthwhile..
The comment about Amy, is a joke I have repeated often and figure you may have heard it.. met when she was about 10 years old or less. Her father Jim introduced us and she did say hello.. see, I count her as a friend..
Fit2BTied wrote:
Since we the people elect representatives to work for us, it only makes sense to let them know what we do and do not want done with our money. It's folks like you who have given those in government the idea that they know best and will not be held accountable that have us facing huge deficits due to wasteful spending on things the federal government should not even be involved in. Nice work.
I love to point out the obvious to you and yours... your beloved orange pile boosted the debt by 8 trillion $$$ in his 4 destructive years..
Biden, like all democrat presidents has reduced the deficit by nearly one half in the short time he has had to work the rebuilding of America...
microphor wrote:
Quote:
"Sorry that statement isn't enough. You got the amount of penalties charged? NO? Just a statement saying he part pf the two million was for penalties. Find that hared to believe. No specifics, why not?
Sorry for the spelling errors, eyes aren't what they use to be and using a cell phone to respond doesn't help. My bad!
No problem.. your meaning was pretty clear.. and I am about the last on OPP who should complain about clerical shortfall.
permafrost wrote:
I suppose the word communism is very scary to many... hence the constant use of the word...
Really, the english do not let you bad mouth the king? Dang, the way the BOO each side in their parlament,, the thought it was open season..
The IRS was indeed targeting the organizations that wanted a tax exemption which they did not qualify for. the greatest number of these groups were the conservative tea party units..
Why she went for the 5th, never made any sense..
But still for the law abiding citizen, I would not worry.. the tax man does after all in some cases need to defend himself and tax men have never been very popular..
Other units of our govt... first I have heard of any other then the IRS... watch and observe..
I suppose the word communism is very scary to many... (
show quote)
The organizations did qualify for 3c status, and were denied that status because of the actions of Lois Lerner. That is why she took the fifth, because what she did was illegal. Do you ever wonder why all these mistakes/mishaps all benefit one side only?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.