Trump is a very bad person. We don’t need any training to understand who Trump is, he clearly and constantly demonstrates this every time he opens his mouth. To bad his followers can’t see it. You talk Marxist, one of their goals is discredit the press! Who’s the king of media bashing? Trump That’s just one. Since you demonstrate no respect for others beliefs on this forum and continue your lack of challenging facts and name calling, I choose to no longer respond to your weak non fact supported thoughts. You are entitled to your opinion and I’m entitled to call it what it is and no longer respond to your notes that support the Marxist MAGA cult. Goodbye!

Inflation started to rise prior to any Biden policies being implemented. Inflation in past was typically not direct result of Presidential policies. That said the President at the time inflation happens takes the hit even though a majority of the factors affecting inflation are outside the Presidents control.
Key is what actions are taken by the administration to reduce inflation. Biden administration has taken many steps 1) High employment allows constituents to better make it through the inflation cycle. ( inflation reduction act, infrastructure bill, etc.)Imagine if unemployment were high at same time. 2) Fed managing interest rate. We’re a little late starting, 3) attacking big oil and Pharma price gouging 4) improving Covid log jammed logistics network . All the above plus more are helping reduce inflation trend. Used cars are coming down in price finally. OPEC, grain, energy, housing and some food items are still impacting inflation( most not up in 2023 as much as 2022).
Trending down for many consecutive months which is good. Glad we didn’t hit inflation rate of the 70’s. Wages are increasing which should help sustain as inflation goes down( not enough to offset inflation currently but getting close.) Major labour deals pending could help if costs aren’t fully passed on in prices, if yes they could make inflation worse( actors, nurses, teachers, UPS) to name a few pending. World affairs are another unknown factor.

I hear you on inflation. Thanks for sharing. Cheers.

This has nothing to do with leftist vs Righists, these statements by Trump would destroy democratic republic, install authoritarian/ dictatorship type government in its place.

Let’s say Trump is Abe Lincoln or George Washington or The Pope, if any of these people had two impeachments, toldover 30,000 lies while in office( even if you don’t believe the fact checkers using same process before and after Trump, the closest other President is under 300 lies-10x less), administration had 2/3 of the indictments of last six administrations, highest staff turnover in history, were convicted of fraud with Trump university, has three major indictments issued or pending from grand juries, convicted by jury of peers of defamation and sexual assault, first president not to support peaceful transfer of power, rated in bottom five of 45 Presidents by historians( using same process for decades) for accomplishments in office, etc. Would you vote forAbe, George or the Pope if they had this track record?
This has nothing to do about politics this is about a demonstrated bad behavior not acceptable for anyone let alone the former President.This is on him totally.

Reported from Trumps campaign speeches. Fairly well supports statements in original post. More power to the President in Trumps speeches. Democratic Republic would be history.

Here’s Trumps list from Axios one of the more reliable and least biased media platform( they are all somewhat biased).:
Former President Trump's second-term governing plans are coming into clearer focus, as he lays out a vision for a dramatic expansion of federal power — particularly the presidency.

Why it matters: In public statements, videos and posts on his campaign's website, Trump complains about Washington's "swamp" — but lays out a plan that would give him, as president, more control of virtually every facet of life in America.

Zoom in: Trump's plans go well beyond the provocative promises he made during his recent CNN town hall — to pardon nearly all of the convicted Jan. 6 rioters (there have been about 500), and to immediately broker an end the war in Ukraine.

Such pardons would effectively nullify what Attorney General Merrick Garland has called the Justice Department's most far-reaching and important investigation in its history.
Trump's comments on Ukraine were in line with his opposition to continued military aide to help that nation resist Russia's invasion.
Those moves would be extremely controversial, but generally within a president's authority. Much of Trump's agenda, however, would represent an unprecedented power grab by the executive branch — driven by far-right conservatism and Trump's grievances.

Federal workforce: He wants to give the president the authority to hire and fire federal workers at will — not a new idea, but now part of a broad effort to "clean out" investigators and officials he sees as disloyal or who have questioned his conduct.
Education: As part of a sweeping plan for the federal government to exert more control of education, Trump wants to fire "radical left" officials who accredit universities, reward schools that abolish tenure for teachers, eliminate many college administrators and remove diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.
Law enforcement/intelligence: Trump — who's facing a range of criminal charges — said after he was indicted in New York that he wanted to "defund" the Justice Department and the FBI. That might have been an exaggeration, but Trump does want his brand of politics to reshape the Justice Department and U.S. intelligence.
He's vowing to get rid of "Marxist prosecutors " and create an auditing system to monitor U.S. intelligence agencies “to ensure they are not spying on our citizens."
Gender issues: He wants DOJ to investigate Big Pharma and the big hospital networks to determine whether they have "deliberately covered up the long-term side-effects of 'sex transitions.'" He also wants to boot hospitals or providers from Medicaid and Medicare if they offer gender-affirming care.
Crime: Trump wants to use the U.S. military to go after drug cartels and street crime.

Housing: He wants to eliminate an Obama-era rule that requires cities and local governments to address residential segregation and poverty in order to receive federal housing grants.
Cities/housing: His “quantum leap to revolutionize the American standard of living” includes baby bonuses to create a new baby boom and the design of 10 new “Freedom Cities” in the U.S.
Guns: Trump wants national concealed carry reciprocity, which would allow people with a concealed carry permit in their home state to have that privilege in any other state.

I have seen nothing that says he supports three branches. The democrats are the ones supporting expanding the supreme court and then packing it with hacks that would rewrite law to support leftist ideas and ideals.
Dictatorial. Record amounts of Executive Orders, dictating to America what he wants and not what Congress passes.
The democrats want to pass all sorts of election laws that would endure their continuous power forever, by manipulating elections to favor themselves. biden supports those changes.

I could go on, but I think that is all you can handle at one time.

First, Trump has said in his plan that he wants more presidential power, wants More control of DOJ, defunding FBI, ability to fire a large portion of government employees at his whim..( had four years to drain swamp as he calls it, but didn’t, wants to do Italian. Biden’s actions demonstrate support by allowing other branches (also Fed Reserve, CDC, etc.)to operate independently as constitutionally designed- thus supporting three branch system and has put no executive orders or directed any legislation to change power of three branches.
You seem to forget that Mitch McConnell delayed government appointments in last year of Obama term stating next President based on vote outcome should decide-pure bullcrap, then pushed through Kavanaugh, then expedited Barrett to stuff court just prior to 2020 election- who’s stuffing the court- Republicans. Expanding the court has numbers to support it (increased population from when nine was set, more rates & provinces, more cases, etc.)and is being discussed but no action yet. Conspiracy theory for now.

Regarding election laws, Red states are clearly trying to change state laws to allow gerrymandering, eliminate mail in voting(main stay, demonstrated safe, sound voting method used in many states, some for decades- no fraud found in 2020 or 2022 elections that warrants a change), voter ID requirements( which I agree with) but without funding or process to easily, cost effectively get voters ID’s, this which puts constraints on some faction of citizens to register and reduces voters that typically vote Democratic. Action: please list Democratic actions on election laws you reference. The ones I see are to ensure citizens who want to vote can.
Here’s a key example to how Partisanship is stopping action. Federal Law indicates voting a age 18. (Age most states you can join military, are deemed an adult vs juvenile, etc. ) Far right Republican congressman are discussing proposals to raise age to 21 or even 24, while far left Democrats are discussing lowering voting age to 16. Wow- why Republicans know that would reduce Current Democratic base, Democrats know they have majority of youth vote. No good reason by either party, let’s see who if anyone puts forth a bill on voting age. Needs middle of parties to meet discuss and reach consensus. 18 sounds fine to me.

Pay attention. The left wants a dictator in power, theirs, and socialism that leads to communism and total physical and thought control.